Author Topic: The Calpol claim revisited.  (Read 83216 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #225 on: July 18, 2018, 10:22:22 PM »
G-Unit jassi and MTI continue to post.

precisely...the forum is now down to sngle figures

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #226 on: July 18, 2018, 10:24:11 PM »
1.   When was Calpol Night granted a licence?
2.   What other like for like products were subject to the same licence ?
3.   Do those products contain a sedative?
4.   When were those products placed on the market at large? [this would include any pilots prior to full launch]
5.   Is Calpol used as a generic term the way Biro and Hoover are/were ?

Well we know the answers to 1, 2 & 3.
Does anyone have incontrovertible proof of 4?
Not too fussed about 5 but it might be interesting to know for completeness.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #227 on: July 18, 2018, 10:27:43 PM »
1.   When was Calpol Night granted a licence?
2.   What other like for like products were subject to the same licence ?
3.   Do those products contain a sedative?
4.   When were those products placed on the market at large? [this would include any pilots prior to full launch]
5.   Is Calpol used as a generic term the way Biro and Hoover are/were ?

Well we know the answers to 1, 2 & 3.
Does anyone have incontrovertible proof of 4?
Not too fussed about 5 but it might be interesting to know for completeness.

its all been answerred...and what relevance does it have anyway...as Ive said the mccanns would have known that there are other readily available products with the active ingredients readily available

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #228 on: July 18, 2018, 10:36:45 PM »
Are we all friends again?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #229 on: July 18, 2018, 10:41:54 PM »
Are we all friends again?

i have nothing but contempt for several posters here...and im sure the feeling is mutual

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #230 on: July 18, 2018, 10:44:08 PM »
i have nothing but contempt for several posters here...and im sure the feeling is mutual
Take some calpol night quick.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #231 on: July 18, 2018, 10:59:23 PM »
i have nothing but contempt for several posters here...and im sure the feeling is mutual

Oh count ,me out I don't care enough to suffer anything about any post by supporters- words on a screen. I don't even get offended on behalf of other people on a forum thread... shocking eh?
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #232 on: July 18, 2018, 11:01:02 PM »
Ah, of course, silly me for not realising and being grateful.

apology accepted gracefully...
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #233 on: July 18, 2018, 11:02:23 PM »
The entertainment value of the responses ?


...And I wasn't disappointed!  ^*&&
 (&^&
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #234 on: July 18, 2018, 11:04:14 PM »
apology accepted gracefully...
My comment was not about one of your posts, nor did it contain an apology, but thanks for your gracefulness, it’s much appreciated.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #235 on: July 18, 2018, 11:13:25 PM »
1.   When was Calpol Night granted a licence?
2.   What other like for like products were subject to the same licence ?
3.   Do those products contain a sedative?
4.   When were those products placed on the market at large? [this would include any pilots prior to full launch]
5.   Is Calpol used as a generic term the way Biro and Hoover are/were ?

Well we know the answers to 1, 2 & 3.
Does anyone have incontrovertible proof of 4?
Not too fussed about 5 but it might be interesting to know for completeness.
Do you really care about any of this, seriously?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Lace

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #236 on: July 19, 2018, 08:28:20 AM »
Sorry I find it ridiculous that anyone would believe the McCann's give the children 'Calpol Night' which wasn't on the market until the following September after Madeleine disappeared.

So how would they come across obtaining it?    'Hey I can we have some Calpol Night to take with us on holiday please?   We want to give it to our children so that they will sleep for a couple of hours  whilst we  have dinner,  actually can you supply it for all our friends too?  Thanks'.     Why haven't anyone come forward revealing the fact that they had acquired said 'Calpol Night' ?

It wasn't much cop either was it,  Amelie woke on the Tuesday night,  Madeleine said her and Sean were crying too.




Offline G-Unit

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #237 on: July 19, 2018, 08:49:00 AM »
Sorry I find it ridiculous that anyone would believe the McCann's give the children 'Calpol Night' which wasn't on the market until the following September after Madeleine disappeared.

So how would they come across obtaining it?    'Hey I can we have some Calpol Night to take with us on holiday please?   We want to give it to our children so that they will sleep for a couple of hours  whilst we  have dinner,  actually can you supply it for all our friends too?  Thanks'.     Why haven't anyone come forward revealing the fact that they had acquired said 'Calpol Night' ?

It wasn't much cop either was it,  Amelie woke on the Tuesday night,  Madeleine said her and Sean were crying too.

The McCanns said that Amelie cried on Tuesday night. The McCanns said that Madeleine told them the twins cried on Wednesday night, The McCanns changed that story later to Madeleine and Sean crying. When two of the three children were exposed to excessive noise, light and disturbance on Thursday night they showed no sign whatsoever of being easily disturbed.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #238 on: July 19, 2018, 08:53:19 AM »
so Kate thought the children may have been sedated....is that supposed to be some sort of evidence of her einvolvement ...its extremely weak
The implication is Kate *knew* her children were sedated (she being an anaesthetist and all, nudge nudge)  and then decided to draw attention to their apparent sedation weeks or months later by suggesting it as a cause of the children’s deep sleep, in other words she deliberately planted the seed in the minds of a thousand conspiracy theorists for reasons best known to herself.  Now, if she’d simply never voiced this alleged concern in the first place think how many forum threads would never have been started.  On second thoughts...
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Calpol claim revisited.
« Reply #239 on: July 19, 2018, 08:57:12 AM »
The McCanns said that Amelie cried on Tuesday night. The McCanns said that Madeleine told them the twins cried on Wednesday night, The McCanns changed that story later to Madeleine and Sean crying. When two of the three children were exposed to excessive noise, light and disturbance on Thursday night they showed no sign whatsoever of being easily disturbed.
Does Calpol Night work so effectively as a sedative that it prevents children waking up due to excessive noise, light and disturbance?  If so then perhaps it explains why Madeleine didn’t wake up when allegedly abducted, and it also means we can rule out woke and wandered and her getting up and having an accident, doesn’t it?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".