Crecheman's identity finally revealed

[Brietta]

Assuming that Trotman was there at the specified time, it is strange that he seems to have seen neither Tanner or Tannerman.

Did he see Mr and Mrs Moyes?  Did Gerry or Jes see Jane?  I do not believe we know any more about what Dr Totman may or may not have imparted to the police than we have been told and in an active police investigation my opinion is that is as it should be.

[faithlilly]

Only in the direction of.  But it was still in that direction.  What was Dr Totman doing in going that way.  If indeed it was him?

Perhaps he had gone to get some milk on the way back from the crèche ?

[Miss Taken Identity]

So when Redwood says the McCanns nor their friends are suspects,its of no interest.

 8**8:/:YEAH...He lied about that as well? Oh No.....

[Eleanor]

Tanner is the only one to mention a direction,all others are asumptions.

So Jane Tanner saw someone walking backwards?  Or she lied?

[Eleanor]

Read my post. I said every possibility.

So not absolute.

[Eleanor]

Redwood was clear on the exact same time,so the holiday maker belived to be Totnam either looked at his watch or confirmed he saw some one to enable Redwood to be precise.No one else about,time line moved on.

What exact time?  Are you going for 9.15 or 9.45?

[barrier]

Only in the direction of.  But it was still in that direction.  What was Dr Totman doing in going that way.  If indeed it was him?

I've no idea along with all else who post here,all I know is that what I post is as close to the truth as I can.
Tanner is the only one to mention a direction,DCI Redwood clearly states british holiday maker at the exact area,DCI redwood also states at the time of the Tanner sighting,Mrs Totnam says they are sure it was Mr Totnam.
From this DCI Redwood states they moved the timeline on to the Smithman sighting.

[barrier]

So Jane Tanner saw someone walking backwards?  Or she lied?

Rather than be flippant read what I said and then find some evidence of any one else mentioning a direction.

[Eleanor]

Perhaps he saw Tanner but not Gerry/Wilkins and that is why Redwood said almost certain ?

If it please, Your Honour, I am almost certain.

[Eleanor]

Perhaps he saw Tanner but not Gerry/Wilkins and that is why Redwood said almost certain ?

If it please, Your Honour, I am almost certain.

[Eleanor]

Perhaps he had gone to get some milk on the way back from the crèche ?

Carrying a child across his arms?  Okay.

[barrier]

Redwood was clear on the exact same time,so the holiday maker belived to be Totnam either looked at his watch or confirmed he saw some one to enable Redwood to be precise.No one else about,time line moved on.

What exact time?  Are you going for 9.15 or 9.45?

Should of read exact same area at the "time" of the Tanner sighting,which I'm sure you'll know is circa 9:15

[jassi]

Carrying a child across his arms?  Okay.

Do he or his wife describe how he was carrying his daughter? I don't think they do.

[Eleanor]

Should of read exact same area at the "time" of the Tanner sighting,which I'm sure you'll know is circa 9:15

But Andy Redwood thought it was later, did he not?

[Eleanor]

Do he or his wife describe how he was carrying his daughter? I don't think they do.

Jane Tanner did.