What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom

[Robin Banks]

On the balance of evidence I believe they were opened in an attempted burglary.  Madeleine awoke and the burglars  stopped their activity and left the scene disturbed.

I thought I read somewhere that Kate popped her head out of the window to see if Maddie was there, maybe it was Kate.

[Robin Banks]

On the balance of evidence I believe they were opened in an attempted burglary.  Madeleine awoke and the burglars  stopped their activity and left the scene disturbed.

Then did someone come along after the burglars and abduct Maddie?

This is getting very silly.   

[Brietta]

Because the wardrobe juts out into the room Matt would be unable to see the curtains blowing IMO.

Would Matt have closed the patio door behind him as Kate did?  I don't think he would have because his intention was to be in and out to listen for the children. 
Therefore there is no comparison between his actions and Kate's when inside the apartment. The circumstances of their visits were entirely different. He was passive she was active.

[Alice Purjorick]

I have no idea what you’re asking, sorry.

It's simple enough. What do you consider to be the primary event in the context of what you wanted to run through? Unless you can define that the argument debate investigation call it what you will is going nowhere.
The fact you profess to not know what I am talking about is hardly a definitive statement. Except by implication on your part you do not have the wherewithall to make a constructive comment on the matter.
I'll leave you to your customary ball bearing rolling.

[faithlilly]

Would Matt have closed the patio door behind him as Kate did?  I don't think he would have because his intention was to be in and out to listen for the children. 
Therefore there is no comparison between his actions and Kate's when inside the apartment. The circumstances of their visits were entirely different. He was passive she was active.

If his intention was to listen for the children wh6 go in at all when he had been listening at the window ? None of parents claim they specifically asked him to go inside.

[Robittybob1]

I thought I read somewhere that Kate popped her head out of the window to see if Maddie was there, maybe it was Kate.

That doesn't make any sense.

[Brietta]

If his intention was to listen for the children wh6 go in at all when he had been listening at the window ? None of parents claim they specifically asked him to go inside.

Do you have any valid  reason to doubt his sworn statement?

For that matter do you have any valid reason for doubting what Kate is on record as saying?

Apart from your belief?

[Robittybob1]

Then did someone come along after the burglars and abduct Maddie?

This is getting very silly.

Madeleine wandered over to Tapas.  Something happened once she was outside IMO.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It's simple enough. What do you consider to be the primary event in the context of what you wanted to run through? Unless you can define that the argument debate investigation call it what you will is going nowhere.
The fact you profess to not know what I am talking about is hardly a definitive statement. Except by implication on your part you do not have the wherewithall to make a constructive comment on the matter.
I'll leave you to your customary ball bearing rolling.

I think you’re just deflecting from what was a very simple question.  Never mind.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Nop, no benefit of the doubt.

Matt seems to have perfect recall about even the most minute details, it would be ridiculous to believe that his memory let him down on only this most contentious of issues.

Not according to the statement you posted.

[Robin Banks]

Madeleine wandered over to Tapas.  Something happened once she was outside IMO.

Maybe she went for a little paddle?

[Alice Purjorick]

I think you’re just deflecting from what was a very simple question.  Never mind.

OK try it this way.
There was no convoluted plot and Jane Tanner's observation was the primary event based on available evidence.
Your move.

[Vertigo Swirl]

OK try it this way.
There was no convoluted plot and Jane Tanner's observation was the primary event based on available evidence.
Your move.

There are some people who DO believe there was a convoluted plot.  My question was addressed to those people, not those who disagree with the (admittedly ludicrous) premise.

[slartibartfast]

As you have already agreed he turned on the light in the reconstruction.

It wasn’t a reconstruction it was a dramatic TV program.

[Alice Purjorick]

There are some people who DO believe there was a convoluted plot.  My question was addressed to those people, not those who disagree with the (admittedly ludicrous) premise.

The thingy with Jane Tanner stands whether there was a plot or no plot.
There are those who subscribe to a phrase attributed to Lenin. I don't believe I am allowed to be more direct than that on here so you will have to look it up......it contains the word useful.