What did Kate McCann really see in the Children's Bedroom

[Vertigo Swirl]

My bad, I hadn’t taken Robbity’s theories seriously.

He’s a moderator of this forum is ‘t he?  Should we just ignore him and say his views don’t count?  Do you need any more examples btw, and can you kindly withdraw your strawman comment thanks

[Vertigo Swirl]

All the statements are taken in the situation of the people as being witnesses.  I don't see signs of of lying and covering up. 
Even though some situations are hard to accept like Jane passing both Gerry and Jez and neither seeing Jane.  Was that partly "lying and covering up" or can it be explained in some other way?

If you believe the Tapas 7 engaged in a prank, then the fact that this has never been mentioned by any of them in their statements is lying and covering up, isn’t it?

[Robittybob1]

So you took Robbies claim of a prank(1 person) and asserted that the whole forum is accusing the McCanns of a cover up? and of being disingenuous:

"quote from VS:This entire forum is one giant implicit accusation directed not just at the McCanns but at many of their friends who were with them on holiday.  Anyone claiming otherwise is being disingenous at best. IMO."

So we can assume that you  1 have no argument to challenge  part of a debate
                                          2 You have lost any sense of any argument by making personal jibes , and insulting
                                          the integrity of forum members.

Totally removed the debate from the thread title.  What did Kate see?   I suggest she didn't see what she claimed to have seen IMO.

Well if you "suggest she didn't see what she claimed to have seen" then you fall into the category of "entire forum is one giant implicit accusation directed not just at the McCanns but at many of their friends who were with them on holiday". 

[Snowgirl]

If you believe the Tapas 7 engaged in a prank, then the fact that this has never been mentioned by any of them in their statements is lying and covering up, isn’t it?

I  certainly recall  Dianne Webster's remarks about her ignoring what went on at first because she assumed they were playing their "silly games".
Silly games =pranks?

[Miss Taken Identity]

Well if you "suggest she didn't see what she claimed to have seen" then you fall into the category of "entire forum is one giant implicit accusation directed not just at the McCanns but at many of their friends who were with them on holiday".

I do not fit into that category at all.  I am stating my opinion based on the story which cannot be backed up.  It is called challenging their version, nothing wrong with that.IMO The whole moving door story is just that... a story.

[barrier]

Well if you "suggest she didn't see what she claimed to have seen" then you fall into the category of "entire forum is one giant implicit accusation directed not just at the McCanns but at many of their friends who were with them on holiday".

Who's decided that things need categorising.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I  certainly recall  Dianne Webster's remarks about her ignoring what went on at first because she assumed they were playing their "silly games".
Silly games =pranks?

Do we have another taker for the prank theory?

[Brietta]

I  certainly recall  Dianne Webster's remarks about her ignoring what went on at first because she assumed they were playing their "silly games".
Silly games =pranks?

Please provide a reference to Dianne Webster using that phrase.  She isn't quoted often so should be easy for you to find.

Thank you

[Snowgirl]

Do we have another taker for the prank theory?

No definitely not !

[Snowgirl]

Do we have another taker for the prank theory?

No ,definitely not !

[Alice Purjorick]

You know full well that explicit accusations of illegal conduct are forbidden on this forum, that is why I used the word implicit in my post.  This entire forum is one giant implicit accusation directed not just at the McCanns but at many of their friends who were with them on holiday.  Anyone claiming otherwise is being disingenous at best. IMO.

Not to mention the "barmy army" who see Sr Amaral as The Boogah Man, to be slagged off at every opportunity.
Not that I object to the slagging you understand, heat and kitchens and all that though....
What I find scarcely credible is the implied A.A Milneish subtitle of "In which we discover that if The Boogah Man Amaral had not existed everything in the world would have been rosy".
Hmmm.....

[Vertigo Swirl]

Not to mention the "barmy army" who see Sr Amaral as The Boogah Man, to be slagged off at every opportunity.
Not that I object to the slagging you understand, heat and kitchens and all that though....
What I find scarcely credible is the implied A.A Milneish subtitle of "In which we discover that if The Boogah Man Amaral had not existed everything in the world would have been rosy".
Hmmm.....

IMO your observation that any supporter here believes that had Amaral not existed everything would have been rosy is somewhat offensive, considering this is a case involving a missing little girl, who we supporters believe was abducted and who I for one believe was also likely murdered shortly after - hardly paints a rosy AA Milne picture in my book.

[Snowgirl]

Please provide a reference to Dianne Webster using that phrase.  She isn't quoted often so should be easy for you to find.

Thank you

I can’t find one ,maybe removed ? Mentioned in other forums discussing this case anyway.

[kizzy]

IMO your observation that any supporter here believes that had Amaral not existed everything would have been rosy is somewhat offensive, considering this is a case involving a missing little girl, who we supporters believe was abducted and who I for one believe was also likely murdered shortly after - hardly paints a rosy AA Milne picture in my book.

No not a pretty picture - but she was left for the taking wasn't she.

IN that case imo - maddie was left to that fate.

[Vertigo Swirl]

No not a pretty picture - but she was left for the taking wasn't she.

IN that case imo - maddie was left to that fate.

No I don't believe she was left for the taking.  I don't believe her parents felt there was a high probability that she would be abducted.   And I don't believe you think that's what happened anyway, so I'm not sure why you're even suggesting it as a possibility.