Why did Kate McCann feel the need to write a book at all?

[Brietta]

No disrespect V G but you believe one version - i believe the other.

Its just that you tend to be too defensive of that couple - there is no need to attack posts u dont like

IMO You don't know what happened you only assume. same as me - only one of us is right 

In my opinion there is only one version ... and that is that Madeleine McCann is missing and remains so.

At the time of writing MADELEINE no one but her parents were actively looking for her.  As we have seen from the many utterances regarding the costs involved in looking for a missing child it will be appreciated that this is a very expensive undertaking indeed.

Madeleine's parents set up a fund to finance their search for Madeleine which housed donations from friends and well wishers ~ including damages received from defamation payments. 

The Madeleine Fund was running out of money and bearing in mind that it takes a lot of money to search for a missing child in Madeleine's circumstances, the only people still actively looking for her at the time being her parents, had to raise it somehow.

One quite often wonders why those who wrote books to make money out of Madeleine are looked on as heroes while those who wrote a book to finance the search for her are derided by some.

Funny old world, isn't it?

[Angelo222]

A reminder that uncalled for comments towards fellow members is a rule breach.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Call it a tale of two books one i would buy - you would buy the other.

That is the only difference between me and you.

One of the authors is not telling the truth.

Perhaps you’d like to quote all the damning unpleasant untrue things I’ve said about Amaral?  If you’re going to pull the “what about you”stunt it’s best to back it up with so e examples at least as unpleasant, untrue and damning as you have written about Kate McCann.

[jassi]

Perhaps you’d like to quote all the damning unpleasant untrue things I’ve said about Amaral?  If you’re going to pull the “what about you”stunt it’s best to back it up with so e examples at least as unpleasant, untrue and damning as you have written about Kate McCann.

Are we allowed to go back to your previous incarnations on here ?

[kizzy]

In my opinion there is only one version ... and that is that Madeleine McCann is missing and remains so.

At the time of writing MADELEINE no one but her parents were actively looking for her.  As we have seen from the many utterances regarding the costs involved in looking for a missing child it will be appreciated that this is a very expensive undertaking indeed.

Madeleine's parents set up a fund to finance their search for Madeleine which housed donations from friends and well wishers ~ including damages received from defamation payments. 

The Madeleine Fund was running out of money and bearing in mind that it takes a lot of money to search for a missing child in Madeleine's circumstances, the only people still actively looking for her at the time being her parents, had to raise it somehow.

One quite often wonders why those who wrote books to make money out of Madeleine are looked on as heroes while those who wrote a book to finance the search for her are derided by some.

Funny old world, isn't it?

Yes it is B ...the only thing i have to say is that is your opinion.- its just i think different in my opinion.

[Robittybob1]

To be correct, your bias is for the McCanns, kizzy is biased against the McCanns.

For or against it is a biased view.  IMO Kizzy's view is not based on fact but an emotion she is feeling so it appears to be more than an opinion, but a heartfelt belief or something like that.    Why the repetition of such beliefs should be tolerated on the forum is something I question.

[G-Unit]

For or against it is a biased view.  IMO Kizzy's view is not based on fact but an emotion she is feeling so it appears to be more than an opinion, but a heartfelt belief or something like that.    Why the repetition of such beliefs should be tolerated on the forum is something I question.

I see posts with emotional content all the time, particularly by those who like to think they know exactly how the McCanns were feeling at any given moment. Just look for words like stunned, hurt, distraught, anguished and desperate. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

I see posts with emotional content all the time, particularly by those who like to think they know exactly how the McCanns were feeling at any given moment. Just look for words like stunned, hurt, distraught, anguished and desperate.

The McCanns are on record stating how they feel and felt, as are those closest to them, therefore for those of us who don’t believe the McCanns and their friends and family it is perfectly legitimate to describe their emotions in those terms IMO.

[kizzy]

For or against it is a biased view.  IMO Kizzy's view is not based on fact but an emotion she is feeling so it appears to be more than an opinion, but a heartfelt belief or something like that.    Why the repetition of such beliefs should be tolerated on the forum is something I question.

Idont start endless threads my post count is 352 in over 14 months im not the one obsessed



Lets say it is based on the fact i don't believe maddie was abducted.

What should not be tolerated is you trying to psychoanalyze someone you know nothing about.

Its my prerogative to be on the side of the little girl who is not here today  - because of her parents actions

Why did kmccann feel the need to write a book - to make money oh and let the world know how she felt

IMO it should have been called kate mccann

[G-Unit]

The McCanns are on record stating how they feel and felt, as are those closest to them, therefore for those of us who don’t believe the McCanns and their friends and family it is perfectly legitimate to describe their emotions in those terms IMO.

If the appropriate quotes are supplied, yes. If it's speculation by the poster, no.

[Mr Gray]

Idont start endless threads my post count is 352 in over 14 months im not the one obsessed



Lets say it is based on the fact i don't believe maddie was abducted.

What should not be tolerated is you trying to psychoanalyze someone you know nothing about.

Its my prerogative to be on the side of the little girl who is not here today  - because of her parents actions

Why did kmccann feel the need to write a book - to make money oh and let the world know how she felt

IMO it should have been called kate mccann

When you write a book you can call it what you like

[kizzy]

When you write a book you can call it what you like

Do u think calling it Madeline  was appropriate then.

Shall we have a poll of what it should have been called lol

[Erngath]

Do u think calling it Madeline  was appropriate then.

Shall we have a poll of what it should have been called lol

I think the title was entirely appropriate.
However start a poll by all means. lol.

[Erngath]

I see posts with emotional content all the time, particularly by those who like to think they know exactly how the McCanns were feeling at any given moment. Just look for words like stunned, hurt, distraught, anguished and desperate.

Do you doubt that they experienced these emotions?

[Robittybob1]

Idont start endless threads my post count is 352 in over 14 months im not the one obsessed



Lets say it is based on the fact i don't believe maddie was abducted.

What should not be tolerated is you trying to psychoanalyze someone you know nothing about.

Its my prerogative to be on the side of the little girl who is not here today  - because of her parents actions

Why did kmccann feel the need to write a book - to make money oh and let the world know how she felt

IMO it should have been called kate mccann

No matter how many times you claim a belief as a fact it is still only a belief.  You said "Lets say it is based on the fact i don't believe maddie was abducted"  that is not a fact it is a belief.