Author Topic: Timeline May 3rd  (Read 129400 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Billy Whizz Fan Club

Re: Timeline May 3rd
« Reply #300 on: June 30, 2020, 11:36:30 PM »
The only way Gerry could be Smithman is if the alarm was raised a lot earlier than 10pm or if The Smiths saw the man a long time after 10pm, IMO.

Well do the maths.... how long does it take to walk quickly from the Ocean Club apartments to the location of the Smith family sighting? How much leeway will you give for "around 10pm"? And yes witness statements vary in the estimated time of Kate's check and subsequent raising of the alarm between about 21:45 and 22:13 (i.e. about ten minutes after the "22:03" check).

Tapas Waiter: "Dinner would end at about 21.45, a few minutes later the witness looked at the table and saw that there was nobody there and one of his colleagues told them that all the guests had left the table in a hurry. In any case, he remembers having heard shouts from the direction of Madeleine's parents' apartment."


Matt Oldfield: "By the way, he clarifies that that news had been communicated to all the friends who were in the Tapas by KM subsequent to her having personally been to her flat to check that her children were well.

The question asked, he relates that she had gone there alone to do that at 21:50."



Gerald McCann:
"it being 22h03, he turned to alert KATE that it was time for her to go to see the children. She immediately made her way to the apartment by the usual path, she having entered by the rear door. About 10 minutes later, he started to worry about her lateness and, at the moment he prepared to stand and to go to see the reason for her lateness, KATE appeared running, completely distraught and crying, saying that MADELEINE had disappeared and that she was sure because she had looked throughout the house."


Tapas Barman: Referring to the day of 3rd May when Madeleine disappeared, the witness says that he was working.

At that time, at about 22.20 - 22.30 he noticed that there was only one person sitting at the group's table, the oldest of them and he asked her jokingly whether they had left her alone.

The person in question said that the others had gone to the apartment to look for a girl who had disappeared. Seconds later Madeleine's father appeared, greatly agitated, looking for his daughter everywhere, obviously and immediately heading towards the pool and surrounding areas.

Shortly afterwards Luz Ocean Club was in a state of absolute commotion.

Offline Billy Whizz Fan Club

Re: Timeline May 3rd
« Reply #301 on: June 30, 2020, 11:38:04 PM »
Which words of the Smiths are contentious or problematic?  But yes, you may well be right, in any case witness statements ARE unreliable because human memory is unreliable.

Indeed... which makes "22:03" stand out.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Timeline May 3rd
« Reply #302 on: July 01, 2020, 12:28:56 AM »
The fact remains that the Judicial Police followed the evidence and saw what you are incapable of seeing.

Any chance you could move on from this and desist miring the forum into fixations of yours which were resolved ten years ago.

 @)(++(* How could you be so wrong!

A)        Has the man in the efits been identified?

Operation Grange is a live investigation, we do not comment on
identification as this information is held for the purpose of the
investigation and therefore falls within the section 30 exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

In broad terms, the section 30 exemptions exist to
ensure the effective investigation and prosecution of offences
and the protection of confidential sources. They recognise the
need to prevent disclosures that would prejudice either a
particular investigation or set of proceedings, or the
investigatory and prosecution processes generally, including
any prejudice to future investigations and proceedings.


https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisations/documents/1205/investigations-and-proceedings-foi-section-30.pdf
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Timeline May 3rd
« Reply #303 on: July 01, 2020, 12:43:22 AM »
Indeed... which makes "22:03" stand out.

This is also worthy of attention;

About 10 minutes later, he started to worry about her lateness and, at the moment he prepared to stand and to go to see the reason for her lateness, KATE appeared running, completely distraught and crying, saying that MADELEINE had disappeared and that she was sure because she had looked throughout the house.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-10MAY.htm

Which means they didn't leave the restaurant, according to Gerry, until 22:13.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline faithlilly

Re: Timeline May 3rd
« Reply #304 on: July 01, 2020, 01:24:37 AM »
This is also worthy of attention;

About 10 minutes later, he started to worry about her lateness and, at the moment he prepared to stand and to go to see the reason for her lateness, KATE appeared running, completely distraught and crying, saying that MADELEINE had disappeared and that she was sure because she had looked throughout the house.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-10MAY.htm

Which means they didn't leave the restaurant, according to Gerry, until 22:13.

So ample time for him to have been seen by the Smith and get back to the tapas in time for Kate’s alert.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Timeline May 3rd
« Reply #305 on: July 01, 2020, 05:03:15 AM »
So ample time for him to have been seen by the Smith and get back to the tapas in time for Kate’s alert.

What drop her on the street somewhere and turn back?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Timeline May 3rd
« Reply #306 on: July 01, 2020, 07:11:28 AM »
This is also worthy of attention;

About 10 minutes later, he started to worry about her lateness and, at the moment he prepared to stand and to go to see the reason for her lateness, KATE appeared running, completely distraught and crying, saying that MADELEINE had disappeared and that she was sure because she had looked throughout the house.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-10MAY.htm

Which means they didn't leave the restaurant, according to Gerry, until 22:13.
Weird isn’t it that Gerry would go to great lengths to undermine his own alibi.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Billy Whizz Fan Club

Re: Timeline May 3rd
« Reply #307 on: July 01, 2020, 07:32:04 AM »
Weird isn’t it that Gerry would go to great lengths to undermine his own alibi.

Except he’s not though is he. He’s placing himself at the Tapas from 21:20 ish to 22:13.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Timeline May 3rd
« Reply #308 on: July 01, 2020, 08:03:20 AM »
Except he’s not though is he. He’s placing himself at the Tapas from 21:20 ish to 22:13.
Then why does Faithlilly claim there is ample time for him to have been Smithman, going by his own words?  Clearly if he agreed with everyone else that the alarm was raised at 10pm and everyone agreed he was at thr table at the time there is no way he could be Smithman, agreed?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Timeline May 3rd
« Reply #309 on: July 01, 2020, 08:09:18 AM »
Here’s my theory.  In his statement Gerry actuall said he turned to Kate at “Ten to” (30 minutes after he returned to the table). This has been misinterpreted by the Portuguese as 10.02pm, they have converted it to the 24 hour clock for written statement and the mistake has been compounded by a typo.

Feel free to scoff and jeer.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2020, 08:28:11 AM by Vertigo Swirl »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Timeline May 3rd
« Reply #310 on: July 01, 2020, 08:49:54 AM »
Here's my theory: timelines often feature in cases and unless some fixed data point is available eg cctv or tel call with digital timings they're only very approx.

You see the same issues with the MM timeline you see with JB, David Bain and Mark Lundy. 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Lace

Re: Timeline May 3rd
« Reply #311 on: July 01, 2020, 09:49:40 AM »

But gone for half an hour according to an independent witness and who was with him AFTER the alarm was raised??
 

Gone for half an hour has to be wrong.   They arrived at 8. 30 Gerry made his first check around 9  spoke to Jes on the way back sat and ate his dinner Kate made check and he was there when she came back.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Timeline May 3rd
« Reply #312 on: July 01, 2020, 10:08:39 AM »
 

Gone for half an hour has to be wrong.   They arrived at 8. 30 Gerry made his first check around 9  spoke to Jes on the way back sat and ate his dinner Kate made check and he was there when she came back.

So much more interesting to try and juggle half an hour out of one hour and a half when there is no indication that any such thing happened.

Even CMofMM sussed that one by trying to shift Madeleine's disappearance to an earlier day, although they haven't got proof of that either.

Offline The General

Re: Timeline May 3rd
« Reply #313 on: July 01, 2020, 10:13:17 AM »
Why's he sending his missus to go and check on the kids?
A check Kate admitted she almost didn't do. If it wasn't for the 'WOOOOOHHOOOOOSSHH', she admits she was about to turn around - AND NOT CHECK HER BABIES AT ALL!
What?
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Timeline May 3rd
« Reply #314 on: July 01, 2020, 10:40:10 AM »
Why's he sending his missus to go and check on the kids?
A check Kate admitted she almost didn't do. If it wasn't for the 'WOOOOOHHOOOOOSSHH', she admits she was about to turn around - AND NOT CHECK HER BABIES AT ALL!
What?

According to both the McCanns the reason they actually looked into the children's bedroom on 3rd was because the door to their bedroom had moved. Therefore I assume that they wouldn't have looked in the bedroom if the door had been as it normally was. That suggests that all their previous checks were listening checks. They listened from inside, but didn't look.

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0