Mark Warner Holidays

[jassi]

GOOGLE defines a rhetorical question as follows:
"A rhetorical question is a question that you ask without expecting an answer. The question might be one that does not have an answer. It might also be one that has an obvious answer but you have asked the question to make a point, to persuade or for literary effect."

Didn't you know that?

My question is not rhetorical and simply has a yes/no option.
The fact that your are reluctant to give an answer is entirely understandable

[faithlilly]

My question is not rhetorical and simply has a yes/no option.
The fact that your are reluctant to give an answer is entirely understandable

And absolutely predictable.

[Miss Taken Identity]

You're quite correct. In my opinion it was only after the event that attempts were made to convince people that they could see what they, in my opinion, clearly couldn't see. Not that they were looking anyway.

Yes Indeed G!  this seems to go with many things in this case. After thoughts etc. They are trying to tie in their claim that they could see all comings and goings as they were so near, but fail to answer if they were so near why did they not hear the children crying? or Kate having to run and tell the group Maddie was missing in stead of saying  a bit louder. not having to shout- them being so close an all.

We are duly informed by supporters that on occasions when real answers to challenges  cannot be forthcoming, the explanation offered would be:  interpretations, stress of tapas Team, stress related amnesia, forgetfulness OR it was someone else to blame for what ever is being discussed.

 Having made these claims they continue to rubbish any independent witness who says it as they saw it without all the burden of :interpretations, stress of tapas Team, stress related amnesia, forgetfulness!

Therefore, can we really believe that the checking was every 30 minutes, and can we believe Gerry saying he had a 'proud dad moment' seeing his daughter?    I am going with the supporters on this one and suggest he may have got mixed up with his nights... was confused due to stress... hell why not.


adding to stay on topic... The group were not in a MW resort just in a resort which had a MW facilities of which they enjoyed every evening- without their children. They then made all sorts of claims.

[Brietta]

                                                   TOPIC Please

[faithlilly]

                                                   TOPIC Please

Could you please stop adding to off topic discussions then when they go in a direction you don’t like cry TOPIC ? It really is rather hypocritical.

[G-Unit]

Yes Indeed G!  this seems to go with many things in this case. After thoughts etc. They are trying to tie in their claim that they could see all comings and goings as they were so near, but fail to answer if they were so near why did they not hear the children crying? or Kate having to run and tell the group Maddie was missing in stead of saying  a bit louder. not having to shout- them being so close an all.

We are duly informed by supporters that on occasions when real answers to challenges  cannot be forthcoming, the explanation offered would be:  interpretations, stress of tapas Team, stress related amnesia, forgetfulness OR it was someone else to blame for what ever is being discussed.

 Having made these claims they continue to rubbish any independent witness who says it as they saw it without all the burden of :interpretations, stress of tapas Team, stress related amnesia, forgetfulness!

Therefore, can we really believe that the checking was every 30 minutes, and can we believe Gerry saying he had a 'proud dad moment' seeing his daughter?    I am going with the supporters on this one and suggest he may have got mixed up with his nights... was confused due to stress... hell why not.

It seems they agreed to implement their own listening service in Luz. They claimed to have improved on the Mark Warner version, but they didn't in my opinion. Those who misread the brochure made their own arrangements and didn't participate in the agreed scheme.  Some might have seen this as a bit of a betrayal, but not this group of firm friends. The others happily ran up and down the road to check on their children while those who contributed to the situation sat on their behinds and watched. Or did they?

On Wednesday night, 2 May 2007, as well as he and his wife, he thinks that DP also went to his apartment to confirm that his children were well, not having reported to him any abnormal situation with the children.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-10MAY.htm

[Robittybob1]

You can think something, but it doesn't make it a fact.

[jassi]

I find it interesting that, as far as we know, nobody else used such a disastrous system of childcare during their stay at OC.

[Miss Taken Identity]

It seems they agreed to implement their own listening service in Luz. They claimed to have improved on the Mark Warner version, but they didn't in my opinion. Those who misread the brochure made their own arrangements and didn't participate in the agreed scheme.  Some might have seen this as a bit of a betrayal, but not this group of firm friends. The others happily ran up and down the road to check on their children while those who contributed to the situation sat on their behinds and watched. Or did they?

On Wednesday night, 2 May 2007, as well as he and his wife, he thinks that DP also went to his apartment to confirm that his children were well, not having reported to him any abnormal situation with the children.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-10MAY.htm

I agree. They had planned to leave the children in the evenings before they left the UK. That was a decision not up for negotiations it would seem!  No rethinking- no risk assessment- no second thoughts. 'It felt safe' was the pathetic reason to cover their backs.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I find it interesting that, as far as we know, nobody else used such a disastrous system of childcare during their stay at OC.

I find it interesting that you are able to deduce this - how did you arrive at this conclusion?  As far as we know hundreds of people may have used this system of childcare prior to the disappearance of MM.

[Miss Taken Identity]

You can think something, but it doesn't make it a fact.

I have not claimed anything as fact.

[Miss Taken Identity]

I find it interesting that, as far as we know, nobody else used such a disastrous system of childcare during their stay at OC.

THIS BIT IS IN MY OPINION.

Yes and also, why was it just MBM who went missing? no other children did. A paedo gang would have taken all three children without a doubt! OR the younger girl.

This bit below  isn't..

We can look at the woke and wandering scenario and it tells us that MBM had means and knowledge to leave the apartment(UNLOCKED DOOR)- it also tells us the the twins didn't!


Amended to include IMO for part of this post. Thank you for correcting this Rob.

[jassi]

I find it interesting that you are able to deduce this - how did you arrive at this conclusion?  As far as we know hundreds of people may have used this system of childcare prior to the disappearance of MM.

Read the words -'as far as we know'

[Robittybob1]

Yes and also, why was it just MBM who went missing? no other children did. A paedo gang would have taken all three children without a doubt! OR the younger girl.  We can look at the woke and wandering scenario and it tells us that MBM had means and knowledge to leave the apartment(UNLOCKED DOOR)- it also tells us the the twins didn't!
IN YOUR OPINION.

IN YOUR OPINION.  MAKE THAT CLEAR IN FUTURE.

[Miss Taken Identity]

Read the words -'as far as we know'

   I highlighted them  in my post in  Red jass...