A retainer does not always involve a payment...it can be a contract setting out terms of service
Does anyone have any proof the McCanns paid any money to CR or was all work carried out without charge to the McCanns..or..pro bono
Aw Davel the penny has dropped...erm well on soft landing all be it. So you now agree that
"A retainer does not always involve a payment...
it can be a contract setting out terms of service"
as sunny said...
"CFA
Conditional fee arrangement- this is when how much you need to pay will depend on whether you win your case. For example, the agreement may be that if you do not win, you do not have to pay the barrister, or you may have to pay a smaller fixed amount and only need to pay the rest if you win.
"
It up to you to prove that CR worked pro bono for the McCanns Davel. It was an 'out of court settlement'- the express may have paid the legal fees separately as was done with me after an accident.
My contract was no win no fee basis, there was an out of court settlement and the legal fees were paid directly to the firm from the perpetrator. I was told his fee would be 10% of the settlement as payment if we won or settled out of court.