Author Topic: "Start by asking yourself what is a sceptic and work on from there"  (Read 35670 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jassi

Re: "Start by asking yourself what is a sceptic and work on from there"
« Reply #165 on: August 18, 2018, 06:16:28 PM »
I trust you will cease referring to “supporters “ on this forum then?

It's been approved as an acceptable term on this forum. If you don't like it, please feel free to go somewhere else.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

Re: "Start by asking yourself what is a sceptic and work on from there"
« Reply #166 on: August 18, 2018, 06:18:36 PM »
It's been approved as an acceptable term on this forum. If you don't like it, please feel free to go somewhere else.

So has sceptics so gunit should do the same in your view
« Last Edit: August 18, 2018, 06:32:02 PM by Davel »

Offline Robittybob1

Re: "Start by asking yourself what is a sceptic and work on from there"
« Reply #167 on: August 18, 2018, 06:36:22 PM »
right we so called skeptics  have our own minds
Some do.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline John

Re: "Start by asking yourself what is a sceptic and work on from there"
« Reply #168 on: August 18, 2018, 06:46:44 PM »
It is easy to be sceptical in the McCann case given the changes in stories, the conflicting versions of events, the invisible woman and the refusal to cooperate with police while in Portugal and when the group returned home to England.  In fact, I would call the behaviour unprecedented in the annals of child disappearance cases.

The police viewed it as extremely suspicious and rightly so IMO.  What I find rather puzzling though is why supporters accept it all with such a tiny pinch of salt but then many also think Leonor Cipriano to be the embodiment of virtue when in fact she is a fantasist and a compulsive liar.
« Last Edit: August 18, 2018, 07:00:42 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: "Start by asking yourself what is a sceptic and work on from there"
« Reply #169 on: August 18, 2018, 06:47:55 PM »
The police viewed it as extremely suspicious and rightly so IMO.

The initial investigation  did... But not so both present investigations.. Imo

Offline Mr Gray

Re: "Start by asking yourself what is a sceptic and work on from there"
« Reply #170 on: August 18, 2018, 06:50:08 PM »
The police viewed it as extremely suspicious and rightly so IMO.

The initial investigation had a very poor understanding  if the evidence imo
Leading it in the wring direction.. Imo


Offline Robittybob1

Re: "Start by asking yourself what is a sceptic and work on from there"
« Reply #171 on: August 18, 2018, 06:52:17 PM »
It is easy to be sceptical in the McCann case given the changes in stories, the conflicting versions of events, the invisible woman and the refusal to cooperate with police while in Portugal and when the group returned home to England.  In fact, I would call the behaviour unprecedented in the annals of child disappearance cases.
What colour hair did the invisible woman have?   "The invisible woman" - Was that a reference to Jane BTW?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: "Start by asking yourself what is a sceptic and work on from there"
« Reply #172 on: August 18, 2018, 06:55:03 PM »
The initial investigation  did... But not so both present investigations.. Imo
OK so you have an opinion but what is supporting that? I'm hoping it is based on established fact.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: "Start by asking yourself what is a sceptic and work on from there"
« Reply #173 on: August 18, 2018, 06:56:14 PM »
OK so you have an opinion but what is supporting that? I'm hoping it is based on established fact.

It is based on all the statements from both police forces

Offline John

Re: "Start by asking yourself what is a sceptic and work on from there"
« Reply #174 on: August 18, 2018, 07:00:23 PM »
We have discussed this before... Belief based on an appreciation of the evidence..

Almost the whole of justice is based on belief... What the jury believes.. Ciprianos conviction was based on belief... One judge believed she was not guilty

I think you will find that there is a gulf of a difference between the statements 'one judge believed she was not guilty' and 'one judge felt that there was insufficient evidence to convict'.  The Cipriano case falling into the latter category.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline John

Re: "Start by asking yourself what is a sceptic and work on from there"
« Reply #175 on: August 18, 2018, 07:02:13 PM »
The initial investigation  did... But not so both present investigations.. Imo

We just don't know what SY or the PJ currently think.  Second guessing them is unhelpful IMO.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: "Start by asking yourself what is a sceptic and work on from there"
« Reply #176 on: August 18, 2018, 07:03:05 PM »
I think you will find that there is a gulf of a difference between the statements 'one judge believed she was not guilty' and 'one judge felt that there was insufficient evidence to convict'.  The Cipriano case falling into the latter category.

I was making a point taht most verdicts are based on belief...what the jury beleives...verdicts can take hours and days to be decided...at the end of the day its what the jury believes

Offline G-Unit

Re: "Start by asking yourself what is a sceptic and work on from there"
« Reply #177 on: August 18, 2018, 07:03:14 PM »
I'm more than happy to be labelled ad a McCann supporter... But not an arse licker as one of your fellow sceptics posted

It's not the label it's the assumptions behind the label. Like 'sceptics don't understand the evidence'. A very sweeping statement about a certain group of people who have been given that label.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline John

Re: "Start by asking yourself what is a sceptic and work on from there"
« Reply #178 on: August 18, 2018, 07:03:25 PM »
What colour hair did the invisible woman have?   "The invisible woman" - Was that a reference to Jane BTW?

Your quick today Robbie.   8((()*/
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: "Start by asking yourself what is a sceptic and work on from there"
« Reply #179 on: August 18, 2018, 07:04:35 PM »
We just don't know what SY or the PJ currently think.  Second guessing them is unhelpful IMO.

we know what they have told us...its clear imo the mccanns are not being investigated...i dont think it involves any guesswork