Author Topic: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata  (Read 294548 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #240 on: November 04, 2018, 08:50:43 AM »
Morse and Keela were tested by the FBI who confirmed Morse's impressive success rate.

According to whom... A cite is certainly required for such a claim

Online Eleanor

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #241 on: November 04, 2018, 08:56:16 AM »
The point is though at what point in the chemical action of decomposing does urine cease to be urine,neither I nor any one else on here can say I venture, so to say the dog alerted to urine is a not stictly true.

Body Fluids start to decompose the minute they leave the body.  And of course, Urine is in situ as it were  This can happen when someone is still alive, along with Sperm and Menstrual Blood.

This child appears to have had a habit if wetting herself, although I don't find that a problem at her age.

Online Eleanor

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #242 on: November 04, 2018, 08:57:36 AM »
According to whom... A cite is certainly required for such a claim

I agree on this occasion.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #243 on: November 04, 2018, 08:58:39 AM »
In America they still execute people.  I don’t think that is acceptable, nor do I think it is acceptable that American judges permit dog alert evidence without accompanying forensic evidence, simply on the word of the dog handler and his “expert” buddies in the same field.  This is my opinion, like it or not.

There will always be cases where no forensic evidence can be found. In some of those cases circumstantial evidence can be used to secure a conviction. Allowing the use of alerts by cadaver dogs as part of that evidence has helped to  secure convictions in the US, Scotland and England. In at least two cases the perpetrator has eventually confessed that they did indeed commit the crime. In my opinion that justifies permitting such evidence to be heard.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #244 on: November 04, 2018, 09:01:34 AM »
There will always be cases where no forensic evidence can be found. In some of those cases circumstantial evidence can be used to secure a conviction. Allowing the use of alerts by cadaver dogs as part of that evidence has helped to  secure convictions in the US, Scotland and England. In at least two cases the perpetrator has eventually confessed that they did indeed commit the crime. In my opinion that justifies permitting such evidence to be heard.

Where in England has a cadaver alert help secure a conviction... Are you making things up

Offline G-Unit

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #245 on: November 04, 2018, 09:03:28 AM »
According to whom... A cite is certainly required for such a claim

Rex A. Stockham, FBI forensic canine program manager, also testified about Morse on Wednesday. He said the English springer spaniel is regularly tested for proficiency, and while no dog is perfect, Morse has been accurate.

“I’m aware of no false positives for Morse,” he said. “We’ve never had any case yet where the dog has responded and it’s been shown to be incorrect.”
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10341.msg499809#msg499809
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Online Eleanor

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #246 on: November 04, 2018, 09:07:00 AM »
Rex A. Stockham, FBI forensic canine program manager, also testified about Morse on Wednesday. He said the English springer spaniel is regularly tested for proficiency, and while no dog is perfect, Morse has been accurate.

“I’m aware of no false positives for Morse,” he said. “We’ve never had any case yet where the dog has responded and it’s been shown to be incorrect.”
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10341.msg499809#msg499809

That is ambiguous.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #247 on: November 04, 2018, 09:09:58 AM »
Could you explain how the alerts in Portugal could ever be used as evidence when the expert has said the alerts have no evidential reliability
It might if there was additional circumstantial evidence that corroborates the alerts.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #248 on: November 04, 2018, 09:10:12 AM »
I agree on this occasion.

May I ask for a cite supporting your assertion that Eddie alerted to urine?
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10341.msg499860#msg499860

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #249 on: November 04, 2018, 09:14:58 AM »
Rex A. Stockham, FBI forensic canine program manager, also testified about Morse on Wednesday. He said the English springer spaniel is regularly tested for proficiency, and while no dog is perfect, Morse has been accurate.

“I’m aware of no false positives for Morse,” he said. “We’ve never had any case yet where the dog has responded and it’s been shown to be incorrect.”
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10341.msg499809#msg499809

So heres your cite for impressive success rate


I see... No dog is perfect but more has been accurate... Then we have the rubbish about not been shown to be incorrect... It's rubbish because it's basically impossible to show a dog is incorrect.... Even the coconut fiasco is defended by sceptics as not proof of a false positive
« Last Edit: November 04, 2018, 09:18:38 AM by Davel »

Online Eleanor

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #250 on: November 04, 2018, 09:16:48 AM »
May I ask for a cite supporting your assertion that Eddie alerted to urine?
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10341.msg499860#msg499860

Martin Grime stated, as everyone knows, that Eddie alerted to decomposing Body Fluids.  Urine is one of those.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #251 on: November 04, 2018, 09:21:21 AM »
Body Fluids start to decompose the minute they leave the body.  And of course, Urine is in situ as it were  This can happen when someone is still alive, along with Sperm and Menstrual Blood.

This child appears to have had a habit if wetting herself, although I don't find that a problem at her age.

If Morse alerted to urine and the child was known to wet themselves don’t you think Grime would have conceded that that may have been the cause of the alert ? Do you think he was being deliberately disengenous ?

Further why didn’t the defence put urine forward as the cause of the alert ? Surely that would have been enough to totally discredit the alerts ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #252 on: November 04, 2018, 09:26:39 AM »
There will always be cases where no forensic evidence can be found. In some of those cases circumstantial evidence can be used to secure a conviction. Allowing the use of alerts by cadaver dogs as part of that evidence has helped to  secure convictions in the US, Scotland and England. In at least two cases the perpetrator has eventually confessed that they did indeed commit the crime. In my opinion that justifies permitting such evidence to be heard.
And in Sweden a dog alerted all over a forest floor at sites pointed out by a self-confessed serial killer.  The only problem was, the so-called serial killer was nothing of the sort.  So should the dog alerts have been used to secure a conviction in that instance?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #253 on: November 04, 2018, 09:27:02 AM »
If Morse alerted to urine and the child was known to wet themselves don’t you think Grime would have conceded that that may have been the cause of the alert ? Do you think he was being deliberately disengenous ?

Further why didn’t the defence put urine forward as the cause of the alert ? Surely that would have been enough to totally discredit the alerts ?

It msy well be that ee know more about cadaver alerts than defence lawyers

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Cadaver dogs are unreliable - Eugene Zapata
« Reply #254 on: November 04, 2018, 09:28:42 AM »
Rex A. Stockham, FBI forensic canine program manager, also testified about Morse on Wednesday. He said the English springer spaniel is regularly tested for proficiency, and while no dog is perfect, Morse has been accurate.

“I’m aware of no false positives for Morse,” he said. “We’ve never had any case yet where the dog has responded and it’s been shown to be incorrect.”
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10341.msg499809#msg499809
Well if that’s good enough for you and good enough for the US courts... but what happened to “accept nothing, believe no one, confirm everything”? 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".