We'd need the actual words at this stage to compare.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES.htm"SUMMARY
The tasking for this operation was as per my normal Standard Operating
Procedures. The dogs are deployed as search assets to secure evidence and
locate human remains or Human blood.
The dogs only alerted to property associated with the McCann family. The dog
alert indications MUST be corroborated if to establish their findings as
evidence.
Therefore in this particular case, as no human remains were located, the only
alert indications that may become corroborated are those that the CSI dog
indicated by forensic laboratory analysis.
My professional opinion as regards to the EVRD's alert indications is that it is
suggestive that this is 'cadaver scent' contaminant. This does not however
suggest a motive or suspect as cross contamination could be as a result of a
number of given scenarios and in any event no evidential or intelligence
reliability can be made from these alerts unless they can be confirmed with
corroborating evidence."Eddie is the EVRD and he hasn't said those alerts can never be corroborated. OK there was no direct corroboration (no body) but in that last sentence he still allows for the possibility of something coming up, Grime says "unless they can be confirmed with corroborating evidence".
