Author Topic: Why were they all at the White House that night? Colin Caffell's alibi?  (Read 42176 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Robittybob1

There is absolutely no motive. I find this whole  things completely distasteful!
A motive for what?  I'm saying Colin would have been concerned for his children's welfare.  He wasn't happy about leaving them there in the first place.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

We don't know whether they were in an argument or not-------but I agree that Colin was not involved in it.
And I'd agree, but at what stage could Colin have got involved?    It would have only required a phone call from one of the persons later deceased, so we can never know if there was or wasn't a phone call, which got him involved at some stage.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Caroline

A motive for what?  I'm saying Colin would have been concerned for his children's welfare.  He wasn't happy about leaving them there in the first place.

I am talking about your constant request for an alibi

Once again you make a claim without providing supporting evidence.  You say "Yes, he has a solid alibi" but don't tell us what that was.

Offline APRIL

5 people died that night all could be capable of ringing Colin Caffell and let him know there was a discussion going on where they were discussing the fostering of his children.  There was nothing stopping CC from turning up in person that night.


WHY? He was due to come anyway. Any discussion could have happened then, that's IF a discussion about fostering ever took place. I don't know how you do things in New Zealand, but in the main, it's not considered to be good form, here, to turn up unannounced, on someone's doorstep, when they've gone to bed.

Offline Robittybob1


Colin was taking the twins to Norway for a HOLIDAY visiting his sister

Do you think he suddenly thought “Oh, I will drive up to WHF and kill them all instead”

FGS...you seem completely out the loop

Unless you do some research you’ll confuse yourself even more.
I challenge you to find a post where I suggest Colin "suddenly thought “Oh, I will drive up to WHF and kill them all instead”".   It is you who is jumping to conclusions about what I am theorizing.  Stop putting words into my mouth please.
Colin was only a 90-minute car ride away so all I'm saying is that it would be possible for Colin Caffall to turn up at the WHF at some stage during that evening/night/morning. 
« Last Edit: May 23, 2020, 08:53:35 PM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Of course we know Colin and Sheila weren't in any argument - like I said, I find this distasteful.
Well in your opinion who was involved in the argument?  Can a person be involved even though he is not present?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Robert was talking about Colin and Sheila.
I have never said that.  That is how you must have interpreted what I have said.   Colin had plans to take the kids to Norway.  Where is the evidence that the Bamber family agreed to that?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Oh, I see !!  Hm-------.
No that is untrue.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline APRIL

A motive for what?  I'm saying Colin would have been concerned for his children's welfare.  He wasn't happy about leaving them there in the first place.


And I'm saying that there's no way on God's earth that Colin would have left London after 10.30pm to drive to WHF, knowing they'd all be in bed. What are you suggesting he was going to do? Pull two frightened little boys from their beds and take them back to London? Oh! SILLY me! I forgot. You're claiming he decided to kill them. 'Course, he'd then have to kill all the others so they couldn't tell. This is Colin you're talking about!!!!

Offline APRIL

I have never said that.  That is how you must have interpreted what I have said.   Colin had plans to take the kids to Norway.  Where is the evidence that the Bamber family agreed to that?


They could do nothing to prevent it. It wasn't they who had custody or jurisdiction.

Offline Robittybob1

I am talking about your constant request for an alibi
IMO without a solid alibi you can't rule him out.  Having an alibi that involves your girlfriend would be considered a soft alibi.

There was motive for him to turn up that night.  God only knows at what stage Colin could have turned up.  Were they all dead by that stage?  In my theory the phone call to Jeremy (3:30 AM) could have been from Colin Caffell.   
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline APRIL

I challenge you to find a post where I suggest Colin "suddenly thought “Oh, I will drive up to WHF and kill them all instead”".   It is you who is jumping to conclusions about what I am theorizing.  Stop putting words into my mouth please.
Colin was only a 90-minute car ride away so it all I'm saying is that it would be possible for him to turn up at the WHF at some stage during that evening/night/morning.


And I'm asking why would he? ONLY 90+ minutes may not be far for you, but it's a very long way here at night negotiating unlit back roads and lanes, and for what? We have NO idea what was said that night.

Offline The General

IMO without a solid alibi you can't rule him out.  Having an alibi that involves your girlfriend would be considered a soft alibi.

There was motive for him to turn up that night.  God only knows at what stage Colin could have turned up.  Were they all dead by that stage?  In my theory the phone call to Jeremy (3:30 AM) could have been from Colin Caffell.
Does this theory involve hide and seek?
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline APRIL

IMO without a solid alibi you can't rule him out.  Having an alibi that involves your girlfriend would be considered a soft alibi.

There was motive for him to turn up that night.  God only knows at what stage Colin could have turned up.  Were they all dead by that stage?  In my theory the phone call to Jeremy (3:30 AM) could have been from Colin Caffell.


Without knowing what was said you can't say there was motive.

Offline Robittybob1


They could do nothing to prevent it. It wasn't they who had custody or jurisdiction.
In NZ solo parents can't take their children overseas without permission from the other partner.  If the Bambers didn't agree they could have stopped Colin taking the boys out of the country.   Well, the story might be different in the UK but I'd be surprised if it was.

Does this theory involve hide and seek?
Possibly.  I'm not accusing anyone of anything at this stage.


And I'm asking why would he? ONLY 90+ minutes may not be far for you, but it's a very long way here at night negotiating unlit back roads and lanes, and for what? We have NO idea what was said that night.
Exactly - "We have NO idea what was said that night".
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.