New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[barrier]

Number of alibis, gotta be right its in the Sun.


MADDIE MYSTERY Madeleine McCann suspect Christian B has a ‘NUMBER of people willing to provide an alibi for the day toddler vanished’

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/17433138/madeleine-mccann-suspect-alibi/

[Vertigo Swirl]

I can choose to make any point I want provided I do so within forum rules. You are free to reply so long as you comply with those rules also. At the moment you are making me feel bullied and impugned without verifiable cause.
It would be easy to respond in kind, but, as always, I prefer not to do so.

It’s the double standards that stick in people’s craw (bending over backwards to be fair about CB, giving him the benefit of the doubt, innocent until proven guilty caring about his human rights la la la,  whilst not apparently giving a stuff about any of the same regardng the McCanns when they are denied the same courtesy), why should pointing that out be perceived as bullying?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Number of alibis, gotta be right its in the Sun.


MADDIE MYSTERY Madeleine McCann suspect Christian B has a ‘NUMBER of people willing to provide an alibi for the day toddler vanished’

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/17433138/madeleine-mccann-suspect-alibi/

It’s all gone a bit I Am Spartacus now.

[Brietta]

I can choose to make any point I want provided I do so within forum rules. You are free to reply so long as you comply with those rules also. At the moment you are making me feel bullied and impugned without verifiable cause.
It would be easy to respond in kind, but, as always, I prefer not to do so.

Perhaps you should desist from rattling my cage since you obviously aren't too good at it.  When you can dream up the relevance of anything pertaining to Brueckner in the interviews you dispute will be time to pontificate on forum rules - one of which is posting On Topic.

[barrier]

It’s all gone a bit I Am Spartacus now.

Lets suppose there's a semblance of truth, the BKA will need a fine sieve to work through it.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Lets suppose there's a semblance of truth, the BKA will need a fine sieve to work through it.

This is what I find odd: according to the report the PJ were able to definitively rule Bruckener out years and years ago, so why then did Amaral have to lie about Brückner’s appearance and that of his van as the reasons why it couldn’t have been him?  Surely Amaral would know the real reasons why they were able to rule him out, so why didn’t he cite those instead of making shit up?

[barrier]

This is what I find odd: according to the report the PJ were able to definitively rule Bruckener out years and years ago, so why then did Amaral have to lie about Brückner’s appearance and that of his van as the reasons why it couldn’t have been him?  Surely Amaral would know the real reasons why they were able to rule him out, so why didn’t he cite those instead of making shit up?

Whats the saying, Never let the truth stand in the way of a good story,

[Mr Gray]

Lets suppose there's a semblance of truth, the BKA will need a fine sieve to work through it.

MWT claims an alibi can be provided by a girl he had a fling with that week. MWT hasnt spoken to her but with her husbaand. He says she was with him before the day of the abduction and shortly after...but not on the day. Doesnt sound much of an alibi. All this is from press reports so not reliable

[barrier]

MWT claims an alibi can be provided by a girl he had a fling with that week. MWT hasnt spoken to her but with her husbaand. He says she was with him before the day of the abduction and shortly after...but not on the day. Doesnt sound much of an alibi. All this is from press reports so not reliable

Since 3/05/2007.

[G-Unit]

Perhaps you should desist from rattling my cage since you obviously aren't too good at it.  When you can dream up the relevance of anything pertaining to Brueckner in the interviews you dispute will be time to pontificate on forum rules - one of which is posting On Topic.

I think if you read back you'll find that you chose to insert yourself into a discussion about the evidence against CB with your spurious accusations.

As it happens the other poster believes Madeleine was taken by a 'predatory paedophile', but not necessarily Brueckner.

[Brietta]

I think if you read back you'll find that you chose to insert yourself into a discussion about the evidence against CB with your spurious accusations.

As it happens the other poster believes Madeleine was taken by a 'predatory paedophile', but not necessarily Brueckner.

Is there a particular forum rule about who and what posters can "choose to insert" themselves "into a discussion about".

I was under the impression this is a discussion forum where one should make the attempt to stick to the topic of the particular thread we happen to be on.

I await with interest your interpretation of the connection between Brueckner and tapas witness statements.

[G-Unit]

Is there a particular forum rule about who and what posters can "choose to insert" themselves "into a discussion about".

I was under the impression this is a discussion forum where one should make the attempt to stick to the topic of the particular thread we happen to be on.

I await with interest your interpretation of the connection between Brueckner and tapas witness statements.

If posters join a discussion one would hope it would be to contribute, not to accuse, impugn, and take the disussion off topic.

Did you have anything to say on the subject of whether there's evidence that a 'predatory paedophile' snatched Madeleine McCann? Do you know of any evidence that it was Christian Brueckner?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I think if you read back you'll find that you chose to insert yourself into a discussion about the evidence against CB with your spurious accusations.

As it happens the other poster believes Madeleine was taken by a 'predatory paedophile', but not necessarily Brueckner.

By “the other poster” do you mean me?  I have got a name you know, you are allowed to use it.

[Vertigo Swirl]

If posters join a discussion one would hope it would be to contribute, not to accuse, impugn, and take the disussion off topic.

Did you have anything to say on the subject of whether there's evidence that a 'predatory paedophile' snatched Madeleine McCann? Do you know of any evidence that it was Christian Brueckner?

Why do you keep on asking the same question when you know and we (Brie, I, other supporters) know that you will reject any evidence put forward by us?  It’s tiresome.

[Brietta]

If posters join a discussion one would hope it would be to contribute, not to accuse, impugn, and take the disussion off topic.

Did you have anything to say on the subject of whether there's evidence that a 'predatory paedophile' snatched Madeleine McCann? Do you know of any evidence that it was Christian Brueckner?

There is no connection between the 2007 interviews and Christian Brueckner or anyone fitting that profile or we would certainly have heard about it from you.

The author of the film, Gudrun Altrogge, also spoke exclusively with former companions of Christian B., who for the first time express themselves openly on TV.
They depict the abysses of a criminal who used his dropout life in the Algarve as a camouflage for countless crimes.

Björn R. is still shocked by the revelations surrounding Christian B.:
"He was one of my best friends for two years. I never expected him to have such a mess on his hands."
Among other things, he remembers that the police were also looking for clues to Christian B. in his apartment: "At 9 o'clock in the morning, the police were at the door.
Then, while I was getting an ashtray, I scrambled into the file.
And then I read that Christian is wanted for child... I couldn't believe it.
Until then, I thought it was about diesel theft and all the stealing. I didn't expect that."
And further: "If a person is so friendly and so helpful, he has taught his girlfriend to read and write, has always been helpful... You can't imagine that it also has such a dark side."
https://www.presseportal.de/pm/6952/5130397

Paedophiles and rapists don't walk around with huge signs hanging round their necks proclaiming that they are paedophiles and rapists.
As far as I know neither are they prone to walking into police stations to confess their crimes.  They either have to be caught in the act.  Or they are connected to their crimes by dogged police work building a case against them.

It seems apparent that back in 2007 Christian Brueckner came to the attention of the Portuguese police.  If that is so it would be interesting to know why they eliminated him from their inquiry in those early days.

Brueckner first came to the attention of SY and the BKA around 2013.  Then again in 2017 since when police investigative work has determined that he is the chief suspect in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.

If Brueckner is charged with offences committed against Madeleine, whether or not he is responsible for what happened to her will be determined in a German court using the evidence investigators have coordinated against him over a period of years.

Everyone is just going to have to be patient until we see how that pans out.