Oops, my mistake... It's just been reported in the Sun that police are dredging a quaint wishing well and digging under a concrete gnome sitting on a mushroom in Mrs T's back garden.
I've always made clear the couple, man and a woman, potentially had access to info re the McCanns nighttime habits: children home alone in the unsecured apartment. If they were involved I wouldn't like to say who the instigator was and whether they acted together or alone and what any motive was. But why would anyone not put such individuals under the microscope and treat them as suspects when a) they potentially had all the intelligence to perpetrate and b) they were known to be only metres away a short while before the disappearance and c) imo the wit stat throws up many inconsistencies.
What I object to is individuals being overlooked on the basis of positive discrimination.
The guy alluded to by the authorities, who we are told has various convictions including child sex abuse, fits the profile IF the motive was sexual. But how did he acquire all the intelligence in terms of the McCanns habits of an evening?
