New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Holly Goodhead]

I don't think the actual offence is in question; it's more a technicality in regard to the jurisdiction of the extradition / warrant.
And although it was reported as news that he won't be released, that was always the case, as the warrant hasn't been withdrawn, ergo due process has not been discharged. So he sits and rots - which I think is fine.

I thought it was reported the 'techicality' involved the hair?  On what basis can he be held indefinitely?  Once his short sentence for drug dealing expires its charge or bust.

[Mr Gray]

I thought it was reported the 'techicality' involved the hair?  On what basis can he be held indefinitely?  Once his short sentence for drug dealing expires its charge or bust.

see my post above

[Holly Goodhead]

It is watertight...hes been found guilty. There is a technicality question on the victims right to be tried as the offence wasnt listed on his original extradition warrant

We'll see how watertight when/if the sentence is imposed. 

[Holly Goodhead]

see my post above

See my post below

[The General]

I thought it was reported the 'techicality' involved the hair?  On what basis can he be held indefinitely?  Once his short sentence for drug dealing expires its charge or bust.

It's being rushed through for this reason. They can't keep him indefinitely, although if his sentence expires, then the clock is ticking.
They'll get the piece if paper and he'll stay where he is.

[jassi]

I thought it was reported the 'techicality' involved the hair?  On what basis can he be held indefinitely?  Once his short sentence for drug dealing expires its charge or bust.

No, the technicality is the applicability of the arrest warrant. Without parole, he has another 6 months to serve.
Plenty of time to bring some other charges by then.

[Holly Goodhead]

No, the technicality is the applicability of the arrest warrant. Without parole, he has another 6 months to serve.
Plenty of time to bring some other charges by then.

I don't understand why another country would want to pick up the tab for crimes committed in another jurisdiction whether it be the rape or the disappearance of MM? 

[Mr Gray]

We'll see how watertight when/if the sentence is imposed.

some of us already realise having read the details of the case

[ISpyWithMyEye]

If he wanted access to keep reviewing he wouldn't bury it under his dead dog.

Why do you think he buried it where he knew it’d be? Eh?

So could go back and get it whenever he wanted.

I doubt he watched vile paedo images every single day. My understanding is they’re constantly seeking new material, for extra sick warped thrills.

But he kept is safe didn’t he?!

[kizzy]

But what you believe doesn’t matter

And you’re in no position to comment on their behalf, coming out with strange ideas that they have closure

What makes me any different to you lol - get over ISWMBI.

Yes, it does matter what I believe maybe not to you - but so what.

Why do you think you are in a position to say you know exactly what happened that night.

It's only your opinion same as everyone who posts on here the opinion of what happened

Surely you have the sense to know I do not believe the mccs version of events.

Till you know what happened as tough as it is you have to realise what I beliebve does matter.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

ISpy/Davel above please?

I’ll look later as I’m busy, but if you have time now,  why don’t you look for a case that’s been as huge as Madeleine McCann’s?

That’s why THIS is huge.

Madeleine has been worldwide news for 13 years — what do you expect?

[Holly Goodhead]

I don't understand why another country would want to pick up the tab for crimes committed in another jurisdiction whether it be the rape or the disappearance of MM?

Consider Julian Assange acussed of raping 1/2 Swedish women in Sweden?  The Swedes want him extradited to stand trial.  Likewise for the case of Gary Mckinnon who hacked into US military computers from his UK bedroom.  The US authorities wanted him extradited to stand trial in the US.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

You don't even have proof that a memory stick with incriminating material on has been found just what HCW is telling the media. 

You do realise law enforcement use the media to smoke out suspects?

And you’re accusing a chief police officer of lying?

Really?

[Mr Gray]

What makes me any different to you lol - get over ISWMBI.

Yes, it does matter what I believe maybe not to you - but so what.

Why do you think you are in a position to say you know exactly what happened that night.

It's only your opinion same as everyone who posts on here the opinion of what happened

Surely you have the sense to know I do not believe the mccs version of events.

Till you know what happened as tough as it is you have to realise what I beliebve does matter.

i think mits important to note that the present police investihgtion does not focus on the parents. we will know soon what HCW means when he says he has evidence that Maddie is dead and their suspect killed her. I wonder how sceptics such as yourself will raect if this provides absolute proof the aprents were not involved...Amaral certainly seems to be in a panic as he may well find himself back in court with no defence

[Holly Goodhead]

I’ll look later as I’m busy, but if you have time now,  why don’t you look for a case that’s been as huge as Madeleine McCann’s?

That’s why THIS is huge.

Madeleine has been worldwide news for 13 years — what do you expect?

I expect the rule of law to apply.