New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Well, obviously you do give a monkeys or why else reply.

Middle-class well to do doctors so that iyo makes them innocent.

The McCanns’ being middle-class have no effect on what I think.

Maybe you WANT them to be guilty because they’re something you aspire to if you’re not middle-class?

But class has nothing to do with murder. Murderers come from all walks of life.

The problem you have, and all the other McCann accusers, is that not one of you can say why they would kill Maddie; how they killed Maddie; how they managed to do it in less than 10 minutes; how they managed to hide her body...all without transport, time, need, desire or a motive.

You just say “Oh, I think Gerry is guilty because he smiled at someone” or “I think Kate is guilty because she went jogging “

Some people become frozen in tragedy and carry out routines to try and keep control, to stop them going mad.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Ive seen a report where at his trial in portugal he had to list his previous convictions for paedophilia...unfortunately it seems the normally highly competent portuguese forgot to record the crimes on his criminal record

His first conviction was at 17 when he sexually assaulted a six-year-old girl.

[barrier]

I think it's the European court of justice... Not ECHR

Yeah my bad, but you got the gist.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Of course, this is hearsay


Well, at least you got that right - well done.,....

And everything YOU say is hearsay.

God, the irony

You claim the McCanns’ killed Maddie..and that isn’t even hearsay..,that’s inside YOUR head.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

I would prefer to take a looksie at official authentic court records.

Seek them out then...Ive seen them

[barrier]

His first conviction was at 17 when he sexually assaulted a six-year-old girl.

Which was in 1994,the second conviction was in 2011,doesn't seem like the career criminal he's painted out to be.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

I think the Germans have a different agenda - to nail Brueckner. Madeleine is only one strand of investigation as far as they are concerned
IMO

Yes, they suspect he killed another little girl who they named the German Maddie

He was near to where she vanished too

[ISpyWithMyEye]

A bit like the expensive Cartier watches JB supposedly had which I seem to recall you refuted.

This is the MM forum, Holly 

[Holly Goodhead]

Seek them out then...Ive seen them

Are you able/willing to post them up here? 

[jassi]

Which was in 1994,the second conviction was in 2011,doesn't seem like the career criminal he's painted out to be.

Indeed, and with a total of 17 convictions to date, he doesn't sound to be a very clever or successful one.

[Mr Gray]

I believe MM to be dead, sadly. I just can’t see the two dogs making so many false alerts. This latest development, in my opinion, could piece together how a body could then have been concealed (possibly in a freezer) and the Smith family sighting could, in my opinion, have been them witnessing someone moving a child’s body from 5A to someone nearby with a vehicle.

As SY say they believe Maddie could still be alive then they must not share your belief in the dog alerts.... And they would have the perfect understanding of the value of the alerts

[Holly Goodhead]

This is the MM forum, Holly 

Yes you're right it is.  Whatever came over me.  I will take myself in hand straight away and remove my post. 

[barrier]

Indeed, and with a total of 17 convictions to date, he doesn't sound to be a very clever or successful one.

So the rape of the woman happened in 2005, yet he was arrested and sentenced to another offence in 2011, why wasn't the 2005 offence brought to light then ?

[jassi]

So the rape of the woman happened in 2005, yet he was arrested and sentenced to another offence in 2011, why wasn't the 2005 offence brought to light then ?

One can only assume that there was nothing to make him a suspect at that time.
I don't think we know the evidence against him when eventually convicted of rape.

Can't just have been a bit of DNA, as he could have claimed consensual rough sex.

[barrier]

One can only assume that there was nothing to make him a suspect at that time.
I don't think we know the evidence against him when eventually convicted of rape.

DNA supposedly got him, didn't they take any when he was first jailed ?