New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Holly Goodhead]

There has to be a reason why the police have not questioned him yet....i've already given my reason why that is...the fact that they do have more evidence that they do not wish to disclose to him at the moment. I've read that if they question him they have to disclose all the evidence they have against him.

Maybe hoping the recent fishing expedition public appeal will turn up something. 

[kizzy]

Might be best to wait until you know  what this concrete evidence the germans have is

If they had concrete evidence they would charge him ... it's as simple as that.

[Mr Gray]

If they had concrete evidence they would charge him ... it's as simple as that.

Are you the expert...you think you are but you are not. I have explained why imo...from what I have read...they haven't even interviewed him yet

[Holly Goodhead]

Are you the expert...you think you are but you are not. I have explained why imo...from what I have read...they haven't even interviewed him yet

You seem to think the Germans are experts on the case? 

The MET is keeping an open mind to his involvement:

“While this male is a suspect we retain an open mind as to his involvement and this remains a missing person inquiry.

[kizzy]

Are you the expert...you think you are but you are not. I have explained why imo...from what I have read...they haven't even interviewed him yet

Oh comon...its you who thinks you know everything.

They haven't questioned him because there is no point they haven't got anything.

1  they don't want him out ...they are running ng out of time

2  They try and connect him to a high profile case that has plenty of interest.

3  It worked the UK media did the rest .....for maximum effect. but yet nothing concrete it seems.

They only have till 16 July. to involve him in any ...any child disappearance seems miserably failing.

Who offered the £20 thousand reward and why....Why would the Germans be so interested in the Maddie case?

On July 16, the European Court of Justice will decide whether a further rape conviction should be brought into line with the International Legal Assistance Act. B. makes use of his right to remain silent.
 

[barrier]

Oh comon...its you who thinks you know everything.

They haven't questioned him because there is no point they haven't got anything.

1  they don't want him out ...they are running ng out of time

2  They try and connect him to a high profile case that has plenty of interest.

3  It worked the UK media did the rest .....for maximum effect. but yet nothing concrete it seems.

They only have till 16 July. to involve him in any ...any child disappearance seems miserably failing.

Who offered the £20 thousand reward and why....Why would the Germans be so interested in the Maddie case?

On July 16, the European Court of Justice will decide whether a further rape conviction should be brought into line with the International Legal Assistance Act. B. makes use of his right to remain silent.

Because his bestest mate heard him say it in a pub, who probably heard it from a friend who heard it from a friend.

[jassi]

Oh comon...its you who thinks you know everything.

They haven't questioned him because there is no point they haven't got anything.

1  they don't want him out ...they are running ng out of time

2  They try and connect him to a high profile case that has plenty of interest.

3  It worked the UK media did the rest .....for maximum effect. but yet nothing concrete it seems.

They only have till 16 July. to involve him in any ...any child disappearance seems miserably failing.

Who offered the £20 thousand reward and why....Why would the Germans be so interested in the Maddie case?

On July 16, the European Court of Justice will decide whether a further rape conviction should be brought into line with the International Legal Assistance Act. B. makes use of his right to remain silent.

They're not particularly interested in Madeleine.
They are interested in Brueckner.
This is just a means to an end
IMO

[Mr Gray]

Oh comon...its you who thinks you know everything.

They haven't questioned him because there is no point they haven't got anything.

1  they don't want him out ...they are running ng out of time

2  They try and connect him to a high profile case that has plenty of interest.

3  It worked the UK media did the rest .....for maximum effect. but yet nothing concrete it seems.

They only have till 16 July. to involve him in any ...any child disappearance seems miserably failing.

Who offered the £20 thousand reward and why....Why would the Germans be so interested in the Maddie case?

On July 16, the European Court of Justice will decide whether a further rape conviction should be brought into line with the International Legal Assistance Act. B. makes use of his right to remain silent.

All this your opinion ....but you think its fact. At least I put IMO in my posts. The fact is..not opinion....I do know a lot. Im well read...educated and understand how to evaluate evidence...

[Mr Gray]

You seem to think the Germans are experts on the case? 

The MET is keeping an open mind to his involvement:

“While this male is a suspect we retain an open mind as to his involvement and this remains a missing person inquiry.

And you seem to think that you are more competent than either police force.....which is irrational imo.

It seems the MET are not privy to the concrete eveidence

[Brietta]

There has to be a reason why the police have not questioned him yet....i've already given my reason why that is...the fact that they do have more evidence that they do not wish to disclose to him at the moment. I've read that if they question him they have to disclose all the evidence they have against him.

When I too read that it immediately put a new complexion on Amaral's podcast pointing to an as yet unnamed suspect in a German a German jail ... without which intervention I doubt very much we would be reading and writing about Brueckner today.

[Anthro]

https://youtu.be/r53DQ_DFewo
More on Foral and Brückner.

[kizzy]

All this your opinion ....but you think its fact. At least I put IMO in my posts. The fact is..not opinion....I do know a lot. Im well read...educated and understand how to evaluate evidence...

Im well read...educated and understand how to evaluate evidence...


Well, guess what ...we all are.....

If you think you are superior its only IYO. ...you are no different from any other poster.


Maddie disappeared on the 3rd of May 2007 and hasn't been seen since, only the mccs know the truth of what happened in that apartment.

[pathfinder73]

The situation with Bruckner is similar to that of John Canaan in my opinion.  Publicly linked to the disappearance of Suzy Lamplugh by some strong circumstantial evidence but never enough to actually charge him.  I wonder what the Bruckner defence team on here think of the way Canaan was publicly named in an attempt to get more evidence against him, and whether they scoffed and jeered at police attempts to build a case against him for Suzy’s murder?  Did they consider that was some sort of cover up conspiracy or bungling cock up too?

What circumstantial evidence? Using his phone in the area where he lived is evidence that he was involved in Madeleine's disappearance?

[Mr Gray]

Im well read...educated and understand how to evaluate evidence...


Well, guess what ...we all are.....

If you think you are superior its only IYO. ...you are no different from any other poster.


Maddie disappeared on the 3rd of May 2007 and hasn't been seen since, only the mccs know the truth of what happened in that apartment.

Actually its not my opinion... have you received any training in how to assess evidence...at post graduate level.

[Vertigo Swirl]

What circumstantial evidence? Using his phone in the area where he lived is evidence that he was involved in Madeleine's disappearance?

Another one who is utterly incapable of addressing the point made in my post.  Did you scoff and jeer at police attempts to solve the Lamplugh case by linking it to John Canaan, or not?