New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[kizzy]

I think the desperation is coming from sceptics who just cannot bear to see evidence of abduction.

I think HCW is doing an excellent job. As I understand the German system is similar to Portugal and that as soon as CB is questioned as a suspect he must be given all the evidence against him. CBs lawyer is desperate to see the file but HCW is in no rush.  from what i can see  hes contacting all CB's known associates to find out if they have any knowledge of where CB was on 3,4,5 of may. My thoughts are CB wont have an alibi for these days and this combined with the other evidence will be enough to charge and perhaps convict...we will soon know

I think HCW is doing an excellent job.



Of course he is ...that is what Prosecutors  are trained to do...convince people.

Like they do.. when there job is to convince a jury -  they are guilty in summing up. ...they pull out all the stops.

Only this time it seems it's.. the people he is trying to convince..at least in a trial you have prooved evidence.

All he has now is words ....in the media...that are not worth the paper they are written in.

[Mr Gray]

I think HCW is doing an excellent job.



Of course he is ...that is what Prosecutors  are trained to do...convince people.

Like they do.. when there job is to convince a jury -  they are guilty in summing up. ...they pull out all the stops.

Only this time it seems it's.. the people he is trying to convince..at least in a trial you have prooved evidence.

All he has now is words ....in the media...that are not worth the paper they are written in.

I think you are in for  a big shock. I don't see how he would claim he has evidence to show CB killed Maddie if he didnt have that evidence...he would probably lose his job...that means to me.....he has the evidence..


CBs lawyer seems very keen to see the evidence....so I would think it certainly exists

[kizzy]

I think you are in for  a big shock. I don't see how he would claim he has evidence to show CB killed Maddie if he didnt have that evidence...he would probably lose his job...that means to me.....he has the evidence..


CBs lawyer seems very keen to see the evidence....so I would think it certainly exists

Well I think you could be in for a big shock and it seems... So will HCW

What you have said is the way it worls ...sometimes it pays off sometimes it doesnt.

I think in this case it is not going to go the way he was hopping it would go.

[G-Unit]

I think the desperation is coming from sceptics who just cannot bear to see evidence of abduction.

I think HCW is doing an excellent job. As I understand the German system is similar to Portugal and that as soon as CB is questioned as a suspect he must be given all the evidence against him. CBs lawyer is desperate to see the file but HCW is in no rush.  from what i can see  hes contacting all CB's known associates to find out if they have any knowledge of where CB was on 3,4,5 of may. My thoughts are CB wont have an alibi for these days and this combined with the other evidence will be enough to charge and perhaps convict...we will soon know

What evidence of abduction? The Germans have none imo.

[Mr Gray]

What evidence of abduction? The Germans have none imo.

They could well have the abductor.  If they have enough evidence to show CB murdered MM then that's evidence of abduction

[Anthro]

What evidence of abduction? The Germans have none imo.

They do however consider an accomplice/s associated with Brückner. My opinion is that Brückner has facilitated the removal of Madeleine but perhaps has no further involvement/knowledge as to what has happened to her.

[sadie]

They do however consider an accomplice/s associated with Brückner. My opinion is that Brückner has facilitated the removal of Madeleine but perhaps has no further involvement/knowledge as to what has happened to her.

Exactly.

My thinking too.

[Robittybob1]

I think HCW is doing an excellent job.



Of course he is ...that is what Prosecutors  are trained to do...convince people.

Like they do.. when there job is to convince a jury -  they are guilty in summing up. ...they pull out all the stops.

Only this time it seems it's.. the people he is trying to convince..at least in a trial you have prooved evidence.

All he has now is words ....in the media...that are not worth the paper they are written in.

Kizzy could you stop using so many ellipses in your text please.   It is not considered good English to right like that. 

[Robittybob1]

I think you are in for  a big shock. I don't see how he would claim he has evidence to show CB killed Maddie if he didnt have that evidence...he would probably lose his job...that means to me.....he has the evidence..


CBs lawyer seems very keen to see the evidence....so I would think it certainly exists

Same goes for you Davel.  Complete your thoughts and write them down .... or I'll ..... delete ....future tense .... you know.

[G-Unit]

They could well have the abductor.  If they have enough evidence to show CB murdered MM then that's evidence of abduction

So your statement above is somewhat premature then;

snip/
"I think the desperation is coming from sceptics who just cannot bear to see evidence of abduction."

In reality there's no evidence to see as yet. There may be IF they have the abductor and IF they can prove he murdered MM.

[Robittybob1]

So your statement above is somewhat premature then;

snip/
"I think the desperation is coming from sceptics who just cannot bear to see evidence of abduction."

In reality there's no evidence to see as yet. There may be IF they have the abductor and IF they can prove he murdered MM.

If there was to be a trial, where would it be held, and would there be judges on the bench or a jury?  I get the feeling the outcome could be different depending as to which jurisdiction the trial would be held.

[sadie]

Same goes for you Davel.  Complete your thoughts and write them down .... or I'll ..... delete ....future tense .... you know.

Oh I use ellipses all the time.  Never heard the word ellipses applied to grammar until recently; to me the word means a shape rather like a squashed circle

I couldn't cope without grammatical Ellipses.   Apologies to any I offend, but soz, I will be using them in the future cos my grammar ain't strong enough without them

[G-Unit]

If there was to be a trial, where would it be held, and would there be judges on the bench or a jury?  I get the feeling the outcome could be different depending as to which jurisdiction the trial would be held.

Germany and Portugal both have civil law legal systems in which juries are rarely used. It's judges who decide on verdicts.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Kizzy could you stop using so many ellipses in your text please.   It is not considered good English to right like that.

[G-Unit]

Oh I use ellipses all the time.  Never heard the word ellipses applied to grammar until recently; to me the word means a shape rather like a squashed circle

I couldn't cope without grammatical Ellipses.   Apologies to any I offend, but soz, I will be using them in the future cos my grammar ain't strong enough without them

An ellipse is a squashed circle. Strictly speaking an ellipsis is used to demonstrate the omission of text from a quoted source. It's indicated by three or four full stops depending on how much text has been omitted. They are also used to  indicate an unfinished thought, a leading statement, a slight pause, an echoing voice, or a nervous or awkward silence. Ellipses is the plural of both words.