New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Vertigo Swirl]

In my opinion Wolters has claimed things which both OG and the McCanns have denied, which leads me to treat his statements with caution.

Hans Christian Wolters said in a letter to Kate and Gerry McCann that he has no doubt their daughter is dead, but he refused to tell them why.
https://news.sky.com/story/madeleine-mccann-prosecutors-letter-to-parents-says-there-is-concrete-evidence-she-is-dead-12007630

Kate and Gerry said: "The widely reported news that we have a received a letter from the German authorities that states there is evidence or proof that Madeleine is dead is FALSE.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccanns-parents-sent-2-22217573

Funny isn't it?  You also don't trust many of the things that the McCanns or SY have said either.  Basically, if it doesn't suit you to believe it, you choose not to, if it suits you to believe it you do. 

[kizzy]

Kizzy, no it's not all out of date, we've had recent statements from HCW to the effect that he has material evidence that Madeleine is dead.  You may laugh but perhaps rather than pooh-poohing everything that is and has been reported you give the investigation the benefit of the doubt and wait until there is a conclusion one way or the other.  If and when the German investigation is wound up with no charges then you can post all the laughing emojis you want, until then it seems a risky strategy to me.

Kizzy, no it's not all out of date, we've had recent statements from HCW to the effect that he has material evidence that Madeleine is dead



Well, Im glad you corrected it to material evidence ...and not concrete material as D said.

[Mr Gray]

Kizzy, no it's not all out of date, we've had recent statements from HCW to the effect that he has material evidence that Madeleine is dead



Well, Im glad you corrected it to material evidence ...and not concrete material as D said.

he used the word concrete before

[Mr Gray]

In my opinion Wolters has claimed things which both OG and the McCanns have denied, which leads me to treat his statements with caution.

Hans Christian Wolters said in a letter to Kate and Gerry McCann that he has no doubt their daughter is dead, but he refused to tell them why.
https://news.sky.com/story/madeleine-mccann-prosecutors-letter-to-parents-says-there-is-concrete-evidence-she-is-dead-12007630

Kate and Gerry said: "The widely reported news that we have a received a letter from the German authorities that states there is evidence or proof that Madeleine is dead is FALSE.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccanns-parents-sent-2-22217573

Wolters sent the letter via SY...It sem SY didnt pass it on. You are jumping to incorrect conclusions

[Vertigo Swirl]

Kizzy, no it's not all out of date, we've had recent statements from HCW to the effect that he has material evidence that Madeleine is dead



Well, Im glad you corrected it to material evidence ...and not concrete material as D said.

Concrete is a material. 

[kizzy]

he used the word concrete before

Yes ages ago...not as you tried to to make it out.

You think you are a smart A ....but in reality your not.

[G-Unit]

Wolters sent the letter via SY...It sem SY didnt pass it on. You are jumping to incorrect conclusions

There are a lot of people jumping to conclusions imo, but I'm not one of them.



http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11585.msg619287#msg619287

[Vertigo Swirl]

There are a lot of people jumping to conclusions but I'm not one of them.



http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11585.msg619287#msg619287

You’ve concluded Wolters statements are unreliable haven’t you?

[Mr Gray]

Yes ages ago...not as you tried to to make it out.

You think you are a smart A ....but in reality your not.

You are getting quite insulting to day  but who cares.

so Im right again...wolters has used the term concrete evidence

[Mr Gray]

There are a lot of people jumping to conclusions imo, but I'm not one of them.



http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11585.msg619287#msg619287

i think you are imo

[G-Unit]

Yes ages ago...not as you tried to to make it out.

You think you are a smart A ....but in reality your not.

It depends on the meaning of Smart A imo;

someone who is always trying to seem more clever than other people in a way that is annoying:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/smart-arse

[Brietta]

https://www.theolivepress.es/spain-news/2020/09/23/exclusive-new-child-sex-probe-launched-against-maddie-suspect-brueckner-as-it-emerges-he-confessed-at-music-festival-in-spains-andalucia-in-2008/
Some more detail from Olive Press.

From my reading of  the link supplied by Anthro I think the video may well have been introduced into evidence for the court.

'One of these recordings last year convicted Brueckner of the 2005 rape of a 72 year old American.' Olive Press

The other one filmed in his home was of an unidentified young woman.

So that makes three instances of serious abuse involving him that we know about.

[G-Unit]

You’ve concluded Wolters statements are unreliable haven’t you?

There is evidence which suggests some of them are.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Re: the video

"The rape of the American woman who had been threatened with a “scimitar” with a 30cm blade remained unsolved until the burglar who found the video contacted German police in 2018. They alerted the Portuguese authorities who matched Brückner’s DNA to the rape".

So if the burglar made up seeing CB doing the rape on the video how would one explain the DNA evidence found in the woman's bed?  How do they reconcile the fact that details of the contents of the video would have to be have cross-referenced with details given by the victim to confirm the likely authenticity of the video? 

Can a serious argument be made that no such video ever existed?  If so, kindly present the argument. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

There is evidence which suggests some of them are.

No there is not.  There is only your interpretation. You think Wolters is unreliable because of what the McCanns and The Met said back in June, but let's not forget: you also think the McCanns and the Met are unreliable too.  Perhaps it just suits you to disbelieve everything anyone says that contradicts your beliefs?  That's your choice but remember, it's only your opinion, and therefore worth nothing at all.