New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Brietta]

2015, the BKA knew about CB in 2013, so do the maths, nothing to suggest images of Madeleine were on there, besides with all the leaks and supposition do you not think if the memory sticks or what ever they were contained anything more than child porn it would not have emerged.

During the search for Inga, police reportedly found six memory sticks with more than 8,000 files, mostly containing pictures and videos of child abuse, in a bag in the ground beneath the body of his dead dog.


Read more: https://metro.co.uk/2020/06/17/madeleine-mccann-suspect-kept-stash-girls-swimming-costumes-motorhome-12862743/?ito=cbshare

How long do you think it would take to analyse the prolific amount of information harvested from this one offender in the midst of an investigation into hundreds of paedophiles?

[barrier]

I think your main reason for saying that is that you find it so difficult to accept that you may have been wrong for 13 years

Nope, person/s unknown removed Madeleine from 5a without leaving a trace to her whereabouts, still seen nothing to change my mind.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Nope, person/s unknown removed Madeleine from 5a without leaving a trace to her whereabouts, still seen nothing to change my mind.

Change your mind about what?  Are you allowing for the fact that Bruckener or someone like him (with criminal intent to take a child) could have committed this crime?

[faithlilly]

You may convince yourself but that's about it. Wolters has mentioned possible photographic evidence so he doesn't include this in forensics

In connection with the suspicion over Brueckner? Do you have a cite?

[Mr Gray]

In connection with the suspicion over Brueckner? Do you have a cite?

You don't seem very up to date with the facts. It's at the start of the second discovery plus doc.. At about 5 mins. I've referred to it before here

[faithlilly]

You don't seem very up to date with the facts. It's at the start of the second discovery plus doc.. At about 5 mins. I've referred to it before here

So he says that he has photographic evidence that ties Brueckner to Madeleine’s disappearance?

[Mr Gray]

So he says that he has photographic evidence that ties Brueckner to Madeleine’s disappearance?

Have you read my post

[faithlilly]

Have you read my post

‘Wolter has mentioned possible photographic evidence’

In relation to? Brueckner??

[Mr Gray]

‘Wolter has mentioned possible photographic evidence’

In relation to? Brueckner??

thats it....its the first epesode ..at around 4 mins. I thought you had watched it

[faithlilly]

thats it....its the first epesode ..at around 4 mins. I thought you had watched it

No he didn’t.

[Mr Gray]

No he didn’t.

Yes he did...he said they had no forensic evidence but the evidence could be witness statements...photo ...video

[G-Unit]

‘Wolter has mentioned possible photographic evidence’

In relation to? Brueckner??

I think he has said he doesn't have enough evidence to charge Brueckner, and that is something everyone needs to accept. If that changes I'm sure we'll hear about it.

[Mr Gray]

I think he has said he doesn't have enough evidence to charge Brueckner, and that is something everyone needs to accept. If that changes I'm sure we'll hear about it.

I dont think... I know. He says the  evidence he has could be witnesses...photos...videos

[Mr Gray]

I think he has said he doesn't have enough evidence to charge Brueckner, and that is something everyone needs to accept. If that changes I'm sure we'll hear about it.

The fact that he says he doesnt have enough evidence to charge CB does not mean he does not have certain evidence of MMs death

[faithlilly]

Yes he did...he said they had no forensic evidence but the evidence could be witness statements...photo ...video

Well there’s a surprise...Wolter revealing the only other kinds of evidence it could be.