New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Mr Gray]

John Casella thinks different.

He doesn't.. You are wrong on that too.
Do you believe prior to Luz the dogs had  never been wrong

[G-Unit]

Its a no from me. Sceptics have simply been fooled by the so  called evidence in the case... Amaral has been fooled to.

They are actually convinced of the McCanns guilt and cannot see how the mccanns have not been arrested.

How could two dogs who have never been wrong.. Have a 100% record in 200 cases.. How could these dogs suddenly be so wrong  in so many alerts.. The McCanns have to be guilty.. Surely.

IMO it's Martin Grime who has questions to answer... Not the mccanns

Others have been fooled by the so called evidence of abduction imo. The only irrefutable fact is that Madeleine McCann disappeared. Why and how remains unknown and that will only change if the Germans manage to convict their (not so new now) suspect.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Others have been fooled by the so called evidence of abduction imo. The only irrefutable fact is that Madeleine McCann disappeared. Why and how remains unknown and that will only change if the Germans manage to convict their (not so new now) suspect.

So you admit that you don’t know what happened but you also know that only the foolish accept that there is evidence of abduction?  Does your contempt also extend to those foolish enough to believe in the so-called evidence of parental involvement?  Rhetorical question - of course it doesn’t!

[G-Unit]

So you admit that you don’t know what happened but you also know that only the foolish accept that there is evidence of abduction?  Does your contempt also extend to those foolish enough to believe in the so-called evidence of parental involvement?  Rhetorical question - of course it doesn’t!

Saying someone is fooled doesn't mean they're foolish does it? Is that what Davel was suggesting, do you think?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Saying someone is fooled doesn't mean they're foolish does it? Is that what Davel was suggesting, do you think?

Please stop reverting to your usual semantic deflection, it really is tiresome.  If you can’t address the point being made please just don’t answer.


foolish
/ˈfuːlɪʃ/
 Learn to pronounce
adjective
adjective: foolish
lacking good sense or judgement; unwise.

[G-Unit]

Please stop reverting to your usual semantic deflection, it really is tiresome.  If you can’t address the point being made please just don’t answer.


foolish
/ˈfuːlɪʃ/
 Learn to pronounce
adjective
adjective: foolish
lacking good sense or judgement; unwise.

I wasn't suggesting that people who get fooled are foolish people, but I can't answer for what Davel meant;

"Sceptics have simply been fooled"

[barrier]

Please stop reverting to your usual semantic deflection, it really is tiresome.  If you can’t address the point being made please just don’t answer.

If it pains you so much why read and respond.

[Eleanor]

If it pains you so much why read and respond.

This is a Discussion Forum.  And some of us haven't got anything more exciting to do.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I wasn't suggesting that people who get fooled are foolish people, but I can't answer for what Davel meant;

"Sceptics have simply been fooled"

More deflection.  i didn’t as you to answer  for Davel, I. askd you to answer for you.  Bu ok, let’s play semantics.  I have been “fooled” by the so- called abduction evidence.  Am I demonstrating good sense and judgment?  Am I wise?  In your opinion? 

[Vertigo Swirl]

If it pains you so much why read and respond.

Just get off my case little man.

[misty]

A wise man once said "There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true".

[The General]

He doesn't.. You are wrong on that too.
Do you believe prior to Luz the dogs had  never been wrong

Casella is da man. You've speed read and discarded Grime's white paper...ringing endorsement.

[misty]

Casella is da man. You've speed read and discarded Grime's white paper...ringing endorsement.

Grime doesn't advocate armchair detectives being let loose on the internet to discuss the expertise of the dogs, and their training/alerts. That's in his white paper too.

[Brietta]

Others have been fooled by the so called evidence of abduction imo. The only irrefutable fact is that Madeleine McCann disappeared. Why and how remains unknown and that will only change if the Germans manage to convict their (not so new now) suspect.

" ... the so called evidence of abduction imo." to which you refer constantly in one shape or form is nothing more or less than a continuation of the slurs you believe and promulgate about Kate and Gerry McCann.

There is not a shred of evidence supporting your beliefs.

But there is evidence and apparently plenty of it supporting the BKA constituting Brueckner as the prime subject in Madeleine's disappearance.

That is the guy who is the subject of this thread.  How nice it would be for you to keep on topic and incidentally how appropriate it would be instead of pursuing what is an obvious fixation for you; I don't think I will be alone in finding your posts exceedingly tedious; almost as tedious as I find having to remind you to post on topic (of which you seldom if ever take any heed).

[Eleanor]

It is so often what one doesn't say that matters.  So I won't.