Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300582 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2370 on: November 01, 2020, 05:08:18 PM »
It’s not up to suspects to dictate the direction of the investigation.

Or to name the crime which has been committed, or to spread the news far and wide using relatives and friends to contact the media. Unless, of course, the police are foreign and your name is McCann.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2371 on: November 01, 2020, 05:15:45 PM »
Or to name the crime which has been committed, or to spread the news far and wide using relatives and friends to contact the media. Unless, of course, the police are foreign and your name is McCann.

Usually in the Uk its the police who involve the media...are you not aware of that.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2372 on: November 01, 2020, 05:19:46 PM »
Or to name the crime which has been committed, or to spread the news far and wide using relatives and friends to contact the media. Unless, of course, the police are foreign and your name is McCann.
Why shouldn’t they?  In any case sceptics believe the McCanns had the power to order the PJ to re-open the investigation so...
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2373 on: November 01, 2020, 05:20:58 PM »
Does no one find it appalling that two PJ officers in the Mccann case... Amaral and Almeida ...ended up with criminal convictions for trying to cover up torture and for torture itself

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2374 on: November 01, 2020, 05:22:51 PM »

You need a question mark at the end of your question.
You need to dot your "i"s and cross your "t"s.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2375 on: November 01, 2020, 05:24:23 PM »
Shouldn't be a gap between cite and question mark but there should be a gap between I and must
We can all learn from the Master.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2376 on: November 01, 2020, 05:25:38 PM »
Does no one find it appalling that two PJ officers in the Mccann case... Amaral and Almeida ...ended up with criminal convictions for trying to cover up torture and for torture itself

I do.

Offline Mr Gray


Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2378 on: November 01, 2020, 05:49:09 PM »
It’s not up to suspects to dictate the direction of the investigation.

Do you mean in your  opinion that the Policia Judiciaria were incapable of conducting an investigation?  Think about it.  That in effect is what your statement suggests.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2379 on: November 01, 2020, 05:52:57 PM »
its from avery good film
Sorry, I don't remember it.  But it was a good one, as I don't use "j"s very often.  "G"s and "J" confuse me TBH.  It could be a form of dyslexia.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2380 on: November 01, 2020, 06:00:34 PM »
It seems its you who is ignorant of the facts...CB is being invetstigated as  a direct result of an appeal on German TV by Kate and Gerry

Did you read that in the media ? A cite please ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2381 on: November 01, 2020, 06:05:00 PM »
Sorry, I don't remember it.  But it was a good one, as I don't use "j"s very often.  "G"s and "J" confuse me TBH.  It could be a form of dyslexia.

I didnt realise until I posted on forums such as this the I'm dyslexic to a certain extent. I'm fascinated by psychology... neural physiology. My son studied neuro transnsmitters in the hypothalamus at Bsc before transferring to medicine. He said no one at leeds understood his dissertation so they had to give him a first.

we argue about who is the most intelligent but I think he realises the truth

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2382 on: November 01, 2020, 06:07:06 PM »
Did you read that in the media ? A cite please ?

absolutely not..I saw it as  live video...australian 60 mins as i recall ..are you so ignorant of the facts...that would expalin a lot

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2383 on: November 01, 2020, 06:10:03 PM »
I didnt realise until I posted on forums such as this the I'm dyslexic to a certain extent. I'm fascinated by psychology... neural physiology. My son studied neuro transnsmitters in the hypothalamus at Bsc before transferring to medicine. He said no one at leeds understood his dissertation so they had to give him a first.

we argue about who is the most intelligent but I think he realises the truth

Of course....meanwhile back in the real world.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2384 on: November 01, 2020, 06:10:58 PM »
absolutely not..I saw it as  live video...australian 60 mins as i recall ..are you so ignorant of the facts...that would expalin a lot

Then you’ll be able to supply a cite.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?