Channel Five documentary - "Murder in a Small Town"

[Vertigo Swirl]

In a coaching kind of way https://www.tvcoach.co.uk/

So not in a "lying" kind of a way, just in a "presentation" kind of a way then?  so what if she was?

[jixy]

So not in a "lying" kind of a way, just in a "presentation" kind of a way then?  so what if she was?

 

[jixy]

Whenever you appear on tv your words , feeling and thoughts are edited as you tend to talk on and on so to make it fit the screen time and also to add to the detail of the true story things are edited  that isn't to say it isn't true so what wrong if people are coached on how to say things in a certain way that is life .

You are making this sound like a sensible discussion

[WakeyWakey]

Where was Shane Mitchell and why isn’t he helping to care for his mum?

Why didn’t Corrine mention him? Infact where were pictures of Shane?

completely valid criticism of programme. his testimony was a crucial part of what banged his bro up and it never even got a mention

also makes me why theres now a gofundme for corinne. shane has gone on to be a bit successful and do well for himself. why does the public need to raise money (currently over £6000) for her? shameless

[faithlilly]

completely valid criticism of programme. his testimony was a crucial part of what banged his bro up and it never even got a mention

also makes me why theres now a gofundme for corinne. shane has gone on to be a bit successful and do well for himself. why does the public need to raise money (currently over £6000) for her? shameless

And what has this got to do with whether Luke is innocent or not?

[WakeyWakey]

And what has this got to do with whether Luke is innocent or not?

shane testimony was a key part of evidence that put him away. so has everything to do with it

the second part has nothing to do with whether or not luke guilty or not but speaks to the motives of those involved in innocence fraud

[Nicholas]

completely valid criticism of programme. his testimony was a crucial part of what banged his bro up and it never even got a mention

also makes me why theres now a gofundme for corinne. shane has gone on to be a bit successful and do well for himself. why does the public need to raise money (currently over £6000) for her? shameless

Shane Mitchell wasn’t involved because he’s most probably not supporting it - he may not even have been aware if was being made?

[Nicholas]

completely valid criticism of programme. his testimony was a crucial part of what banged his bro up and it never even got a mention

also makes me why theres now a gofundme for corinne. shane has gone on to be a bit successful and do well for himself. why does the public need to raise money (currently over £6000) for her? shameless

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10836.msg642993#msg642993

[puglove]

shane testimony was a key part of evidence that put him away. so has everything to do with it

the second part has nothing to do with whether or not luke guilty or not but speaks to the motives of those involved in innocence fraud

Corrine said that SHE was Luke's alibi, but I thought that the reason that Luke was cooking the tea (and burning the pie which his brother didn't smell when he was upstairs having a tug) was that she was working late?

Both episodes were a bit Corrine-heavy    .

[Bullseye]

For me it all comes down to what Shane remembers, some say he admitted to Luke not being home that evening, others say he was flustered in court and not able to clearly put his side across. Some say he fully supports Luke behind the scenes, others say he freely admits he believes Luke is guilty. Only Shane can tell us what’s true. I’d love to hear a statement from him, if he supports his brother now would be the time.

[faithlilly]

For me it all comes down to what Shane remembers, some say he admitted to Luke not being home that evening, others say he was flustered in court and not able to clearly put his side across. Some say he fully supports Luke behind the scenes, others say he freely admits he believes Luke is guilty. Only Shane can tell us what’s true. I’d love to hear a statement from him, if he supports his brother now would be the time.

This case is now so toxic I don’t blame anyone who wishes to remain out of the pubic eye.

[Nicholas]

This case is now so toxic I don’t blame anyone who wishes to remain out of the pubic eye.

Not ‘anyone” - Shane Mitchell

Where is he?

[WakeyWakey]

im not talking about the status of their relationship. talking about him not being included or even mentioned in a documentary looking into this case, when his testimonies were some of most crucial evidence in trial. not surprising its the biggest question mark that remains for most people. the supposed private investigators could and should have easily adressed this. it might even have worked in favour of supporting luke innocence dependin on what shane say these days, right?

the money motive from sandra has been apparent since at least when the wronglyaccusedperson "charity" was set up - late 2010, arguably before with books

its no secret miscarriages of justice are money making opportunities for many

[faithlilly]

What are you on about ? Money ?

Read back.

[faithlilly]

Not ‘anyone” - Shane Mitchell

Where is he?

Who knows.

One thing I do know he should be left to get on with his life, no matter what his choices are in relation to the case.