Goncalo Amaral's thesis trashed by SY and PJ

[AnneGuedes]

Which automatically proves that Amaral's thesis is trashed and that he was barking up the wrong tree.

Again the wrong tree ! Don't you know another expression ?

[Lyall]

But police statements are not PR.

And your total inability to understand that society depends on trust in the actions of the police is very telling.

The situation is not as it was in 2008. Two senior teams of police officers have reviewed all the evidence since then and concluded that Amaral was simply barking up the wrong tree.

No, that's a recipe for a police state gilet, exactly what you'd have if the public trusted in police without them showing how they reached their conclusions.

Until/if police eventually do we can believe what we wish.

And if they don't we are still in the July 2008 situation.

[AnneGuedes]

No. Two teams who conducted reviews as I said. You introduced the third team which did not participate in the reviews, not me.

The source is none other than Director Nacional Adjunto da PJ, Pedro do Carmo.

The Faro team exists, though, they're not SY's subordinates.
Pedro do Carmo, ah ! A friend of yours !

[sadie]

Again the wrong tree ! Don't you know another expression ?

It's the polite way of saying that he made a bludy mess of it, Anne

Now I might have come out with the plain facts, but gilet is more gentile.

[lizzibif.]

Again the wrong tree ! Don't you know another expression ?

gilet doesn't need another expression..barking up the wrong tree is apt 

[AnneGuedes]

Sheesh.

Hum... not really expected from a civilised lady.

[sadie]

Hum... not really expected from a civilised lady.

Claptrap ... especially from someone who talked about Madeleine as an ITEM

[AnneGuedes]

Do you not actually understand that cadaver odour is not a body, that cadaver odour can be present in a room when no body has been present there?

I am staggered by the low levels of comprehension of the subject demonstrated in your post.

One of the most well-known child disappearance cases in the UK had the perfect scenario of dog alerting to cadaver odour. But no body was present and no body had been present. It was a bed that was contaminated with cadaver odour which had been brought into the room.

There is no proof anybody died in the apartment.

QED

I find this now, I must confess that I'm surprised, You don't seem to have even read the reports of Prof Harrison MBE. And no there was no furniture of dead person in the flat. The cadaver scent volatile molecules were trapped in the walls. They can stay inside for months (read the article I sent). No, we can't be sure whose cadaver it was and this is why this is no proof, just a presumption.

[AnneGuedes]

Claptrap ... especially from someone who talked about Madeleine as an ITEM

Civilised Benice didn't !

[icabodcrane]

Claptrap ... especially from someone who talked about Madeleine as an ITEM

Now now  ...  steady on sadie 

If we're talking claptrap,  we have to consider that   'theory'  you  insisted  'fitted'  for so long  ...  you know,  the one Scotland Yard utterly debunked   

[sadie]

I find this now, I must confess that I'm surprised, You don't seem to have even read the reports of Prof Harrison MBE. And no there was no furniture of dead person in the flat. The cadaver scent volatile molecules were trapped in the walls. They can stay inside for months (read the article I sent). No, we can't be sure whose cadaver it was and this is why this is no proof, just a presumption.

Btw, Tasmin Silences grandfather lived there.  He died in hospital.  What happened to his pyjamas?

Highly intelligent Tasmin is the little girl who noticed a man lpeering over the wall at 5A patio windows.

[sadie]

Civilised Benice didn't !

most certainly she wouldn't have called Madeleine or any child an item ... as you did.

[AnneGuedes]

  'Kate and Gerry won't be making any further comment'

...  but their lawyer will be singing like a canary  !

Proxy as ever

[AnneGuedes]

most certainly she wouldn't have called Madeleine or any child an item ... as you did.

I meant a cadaver and used an euphemism inspired by Harmony.

[gilet]

I find this now, I must confess that I'm surprised, You don't seem to have even read the reports of Prof Harrison MBE. And no there was no furniture of dead person in the flat. The cadaver scent volatile molecules were trapped in the walls. They can stay inside for months (read the article I sent). No, we can't be sure whose cadaver it was and this is why this is no proof, just a presumption.

I never said there was furniture from a dead person in Apt 5A. You have misread my post. I used that other example to indicate the fact that NO body need have been in Apt 5A for cadaver scent to be present.

That remains the case.

Not only is there no indication as to who the cadaver odour originally came from but there is no indication that it ever came from a body that was present in the apartment. It could have been taken there on any manner of objects; clothes, luggage etc.