Author Topic: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.  (Read 143812 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Silkywhiskers

  • Guest
Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #435 on: June 02, 2014, 01:19:31 AM »
In the video, what Mrs F says is that she has not spoken to journalists. The UK press were then fed stories which grossly and deliberately distorted that.

We can just add her to the bonfire of the vanities that is Team McCann.

Offline misty

Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #436 on: June 02, 2014, 01:46:16 AM »
We can just add her to the bonfire of the vanities that is Team McCann.

Mrs Fenn is probably not  lying - she didn't knowingly speak to any journalists. But she apparently did speak to her hairdresser, and probably other folk in the community, and the local journos have jumped on the heresay & developed the story in their own unique way. It's what they get paid for.

Offline pegasus

Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #437 on: June 02, 2014, 01:59:01 AM »
... developed the story in their own unique way...
Unique way indeed, whoever fed the journos deliberately distorted what Mrs F said.

Silkywhiskers

  • Guest
Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #438 on: June 02, 2014, 02:16:01 AM »
Unique way indeed, whoever fed the journos deliberately distorted what Mrs F said.

How distorted was it, considering Kate acknowledged it in her book?

Offline pegasus

Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #439 on: June 02, 2014, 02:30:24 AM »
How distorted was it, considering Kate acknowledged it in her book?
I can't check your interesting question now but will do later.
Basically, she truthfully did not hear it, Mrs F truthfully did hear it, JIMO.

Offline misty

Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #440 on: June 02, 2014, 02:37:13 AM »
An example of distortion, from Joana Morais blogspot


Sunday Mirror - 23/09/2007: "A key witness in the Madeleine McCann case yesterday DENIED telling cops that she heard the family screaming and arguing.

Pamela Fenn, 81, who lives above the Praia da Luz apartment Madeleine vanished from, supposedly said she heard the four-year-old "scream for four hours" the night before."

Offline John

Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #441 on: June 02, 2014, 02:45:28 AM »
Unique way indeed, whoever fed the journos deliberately distorted what Mrs F said.

You don't need anyone to feed journalists because they make it up themselves to get a sensationalistic type headline.  The Jerry Lawton "Madeleine found in Ireland" or the "Madeleine found in Turkey" nonsense comes to mind.

I have a suspicion that journalists may have spoken to Mrs Fenn without revealing who they were or even came by the stories from a third party.  Bottom line is don't believe anything you read in the Press unless it is corroborated by official sources.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2014, 03:24:54 PM by Mr Moderator »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Silkywhiskers

  • Guest
Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #442 on: June 02, 2014, 08:53:49 PM »
An example of distortion, from Joana Morais blogspot


Sunday Mirror - 23/09/2007: "A key witness in the Madeleine McCann case yesterday DENIED telling cops that she heard the family screaming and arguing.

Pamela Fenn, 81, who lives above the Praia da Luz apartment Madeleine vanished from, supposedly said she heard the four-year-old "scream for four hours" the night before."

Isn't the Sunday Mirror one of the rags that was forced to pay the McCann for printing false stories?


Offline jassi

Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #443 on: June 21, 2014, 08:39:00 AM »

Maybe they cried both nights.   Maybe they cried every night.
« Last Edit: June 24, 2014, 02:45:46 PM by John »
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Moderator

Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #444 on: June 23, 2014, 11:12:42 AM »

Maybe they cried both nights.   Maybe they cried every night.

Spot on  8((()*/

Pamela Fenn was out on Wed night and Moyes weren't in PdL on Tuesday night...it isn't rocket science.
« Last Edit: June 23, 2014, 11:15:04 AM by Mr Moderator »

Offline pegasus

Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #445 on: June 23, 2014, 03:08:25 PM »
Spot on  8((()*/

Pamela Fenn was out on Wed night and Moyes weren't in PdL on Tuesday night...it isn't rocket science.
Tapas waiter Oliveira's statement says that Wed night was the late night.

"on Wednesday, certain elements of the group got up, with their after-dinner drinks, and headed to the bar "
« Last Edit: June 23, 2014, 03:23:12 PM by pegasus »

Offline pegasus

Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #446 on: June 23, 2014, 03:37:17 PM »
Pamela Fenn was out on Wed night ...
I think it was Wednesday night PF heard the crying.
Assuming that the Portugal Telecom company still has landline records for 2007, those records would prove whether the mid-crying phonecall after 23:00 from PF to EG was on the 1st, or on the 2nd.
« Last Edit: June 23, 2014, 03:39:16 PM by pegasus »

Offline John

Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #447 on: June 24, 2014, 02:39:58 PM »
I think it was Wednesday night PF heard the crying.
Assuming that the Portugal Telecom company still has landline records for 2007, those records would prove whether the mid-crying phonecall after 23:00 from PF to EG was on the 1st, or on the 2nd.

Heard her from the other side of town where she was visiting her friend to get away from the previous nights howling.  All makes perfect sense.

To clarify.  Mrs Fenn was at home Tue night and out visiting on the Wed night.  Ergo she had to have heard the crying child on the Tue night.
« Last Edit: June 24, 2014, 02:41:59 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline John

Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #448 on: June 24, 2014, 03:08:18 PM »
It wasn't even half an hour as Mrs Fenn heard Madeleine crying for well over an hour. 
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline VIXTE

Re: Mrs Fenn and that crying child incident revisited.
« Reply #449 on: June 24, 2014, 05:58:28 PM »
It wasn't even half an hour as Mrs Fenn heard Madeleine crying for well over an hour.

And we can be sure that was Madeleine who cried?
How exactly this can be established?