Author Topic: Innocentman came forward in 2007!  (Read 52110 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sherlock Holmes

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #165 on: January 25, 2014, 10:26:06 PM »
Then you have a partner, that's marvellous !

Yes, it's great fun!

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #166 on: January 25, 2014, 10:27:24 PM »
Considering a driver could have been miles away by the time Smithman was spotted...

True but remains conjecture, hypothesis speculation and all those legalese terms..guesswork in laymans

Offline Sherlock Holmes

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #167 on: January 25, 2014, 10:34:26 PM »
Que?

Anne and I often stray off topic, Eleanor. Will reroute the conversation when we're all finished.

Offline Sherlock Holmes

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #168 on: January 25, 2014, 10:36:06 PM »
True but remains conjecture, hypothesis speculation and all those legalese terms..guesswork in laymans

Its is indeed pure guesswork.

That's the frustrating thing about this whole case, though, isn't it? There is very little evidence for anything.


Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #169 on: January 25, 2014, 10:39:17 PM »
Its is indeed pure guesswork.

That's the frustrating thing about this whole case, though, isn't it? There is very little evidence for anything.

Theres circumstantial SH..lots of it...and not all of just around the events of one night..depends which way you thnk the tossed coin lands as to probability, thats all


Offline pathfinder73

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #170 on: January 25, 2014, 10:39:29 PM »
Are you referring to the Payne questionnaires ?

I'm taking that into consideration. The time that stands out is the daily routine change is 6.30-7pm. That's the first thing I would do in an investigation. Did the daily routine change on the day she disappeared? It did at that time and first bed sight check of Madeleine of the week at just after 9pm so that stands out.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #171 on: January 25, 2014, 10:40:00 PM »
True but remains conjecture, hypothesis speculation and all those legalese terms..guesswork in laymans

So we have

A child bundled quickly into a car and driven away by a stranger ..or

A dead child kept in  a fridge the transported in a car under the eyes of the worlds press , leaving no dna trace in the car..and disposed of..

What would the statistics say

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #172 on: January 25, 2014, 10:41:10 PM »
Theres circumstantial SH..lots of it...and not all of just around the events of one night..depends which way you thnk the tossed coin lands as to probability, thats all

The coin would have to land on its edge for your theory to have any credence

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #173 on: January 25, 2014, 10:45:28 PM »
Or Tannermans

Or a charity collector three weeks earlier being the abductor, because he gave some old woman the creeps,or a man seen in Oct 2006 around the apartment being the abductor, or a near death 67 yr old ex convicted child abductor being the abductor, or a woman in barcelona buying a baby, that the witness took two yrs to come forward with info for, or all the long string of other pathetic and "manufactured" sightings, all so much more likely I suppose

Offline Eleanor

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #174 on: January 25, 2014, 10:46:30 PM »
Anne and I often stray off topic, Eleanor. Will reroute the conversation when we're all finished.

I think you missed my point.  But never mind.  Anne won't have done.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #175 on: January 25, 2014, 10:48:40 PM »


LOL how sad but true is that!

Mirror said this man was identical to Tannerman


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-nannys-new-sketch-329189

The one seen 2006


sad pathetic idiots

and of course if this was true  he also bore resemblance to hewlett cooperman and a dozen others whilst we are at it
« Last Edit: January 25, 2014, 10:53:34 PM by Redblossom »

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #176 on: January 25, 2014, 10:55:29 PM »
So we have

A child bundled quickly into a car and driven away by a stranger ..or

A dead child kept in  a fridge the transported in a car under the eyes of the worlds press , leaving no dna trace in the car..and disposed of..

What would the statistics say

Was there any mention of a car in Crimewatch, davel? Aren't you going completely off message? You're jettisoning both sightings now? >@@(*&)

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #177 on: January 25, 2014, 10:59:43 PM »
Was there any mention of a car in Crimewatch, davel? Aren't you going completely off message? You're jettisoning both sightings now? >@@(*&)

im not off track at all...Redwood has said that the smith sighting may be an innocent holidaymaker...both sightings may be innocent...who knows

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #178 on: January 25, 2014, 11:03:39 PM »
Was there any mention of a car in Crimewatch, davel? Aren't you going completely off message? You're jettisoning both sightings now? >@@(*&)

No sightings then at all in thatcase

 @)(++(*
Scuppers all circumstantial evidence for abduction

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #179 on: January 25, 2014, 11:09:48 PM »
No sightings then at all in thatcase

 @)(++(*
Scuppers all circumstantial evidence for abduction

The night is young. Dave may well be thinking our way by morning 8)-)))