Author Topic: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?  (Read 355128 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1245 on: July 28, 2014, 09:56:34 PM »
In the investigation into the murder of Attracta Harron, where was there a line-up of cars?

Yes there was.

"The video clearly showed the spaniel examining the other vehicles without reacting, and as soon as it entered the Lantra it began barking and refused to get out."

http://attracta.martinharran.com/openstate.htm
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline pegasus

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1246 on: July 28, 2014, 10:11:32 PM »
Yes there was.

"The video clearly showed the spaniel examining the other vehicles without reacting, and as soon as it entered the Lantra it began barking and refused to get out."

http://attracta.martinharran.com/openstate.htm
When I said the Lantra stood out like a burnt thumb, I mean it was burnt out.
So here is a freeby for those desperate to accuse Mr Grime of cueing - those peeps can argue that he observantly noticed the tiny weeny clue that one car in the selection of four was burnt, and thought "ah I have noticed that car is different because it has had a huge fire in it so that is the car I need to trick Eddie into signalling"
« Last Edit: July 28, 2014, 10:34:03 PM by pegasus »

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1247 on: July 28, 2014, 10:39:22 PM »
When I said the Lantra stood out like a burnt thumb, I mean it was burnt out.
So here is a freeby for those desperate to accuse Mr Grime of cueing - those peeps can argue that he observantly noticed the tiny weeny clue that one car in the selection of four was burnt, and thought "ah I have noticed that car is different because it has had a huge fire in it so that is the car I need to trick Eddie into signalling"

Yes it's ridiculous. Eddie barks to alert to the car not Grime  @)(++(*
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1248 on: July 28, 2014, 10:41:39 PM »
Yes there was.

"The video clearly showed the spaniel examining the other vehicles without reacting, and as soon as it entered the Lantra it began barking and refused to get out."

http://attracta.martinharran.com/openstate.htm

The account does not make plain that the vehicles were examined simultaneously and the deciding factor was dna evidence, corroborated in a forensic laboratory, as belonging to the victim.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1249 on: July 28, 2014, 10:48:53 PM »
The account does not make plain that the vehicles were examined simultaneously and the deciding factor was dna evidence, corroborated in a forensic laboratory, as belonging to the victim.

"A video without sound was shown in the court showing a Springer Spaniel dog examining two cars and a small van before being taken to the Lantra that had been driven by Hamilton and subsequently burned out, allegedly maliciously.

The video clearly showed the spaniel examining the other vehicles without reacting, and as soon as it entered the Lantra it began barking and refused to get out. Its search of the vehicle focused on the front passenger and rear seats.

Further forensic examination was carried out in the rear and passenger compartments of the vehicle and blood was detected from material taken from the car for examination. A car mat from the rear of the car was also shown to contain blood, and because of that, the investigation focused on Hamilton, Mr Mooney said, which included a comprehensive search of the property at Concess Road and in particular the sites of fires in the garden."
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1250 on: July 29, 2014, 02:47:01 PM »
Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?

In McCann lala land specialist dogs alert to any substance one may care to name but none the less specialist dogs are used by many law enforcement agencies.
Perhaps posters might like to address that little paradox.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1251 on: July 29, 2014, 02:50:05 PM »
Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?

In McCann lala land specialist dogs alert to any substance one may care to name but none the less specialist dogs are used by many law enforcement agencies.
Perhaps posters might like to address that little paradox.

Paradox?

Dogs are useful tools but not infallible.

In the Shannon Matthews case a cadaver dog alerted but there were no bodies.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1252 on: July 29, 2014, 03:26:43 PM »
Paradox?

Dogs are useful tools but not infallible.

In the Shannon Matthews case a cadaver dog alerted but there were no bodies.

Now that's not true, is it ferryman ?

The dog alerted to a mattress on which an individual had died.

Why do you spread such easily refuted rubbish ? Are things really that desperate ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1253 on: July 29, 2014, 03:36:21 PM »
Now that's not true, is it ferryman ?

The dog alerted to a mattress on which an individual had died.

Why do you spread such easily refuted rubbish ? Are things really that desperate ?

There are alerts that advance a criminal investigation.

And there are alerts that can confound or confuse a criminal enquiry.

And there are alerts that are the result of incompetent mishandling of a dog.

A well trained dog, properly handled, can be an asset to a criminal enquiry.

Even the best-trained dog poorly handled can be an outright liability.

And extraneous and unpredicted variables can simply complicate matters with no advantage to anyone ...

[ removed speculation ]
« Last Edit: August 01, 2014, 05:07:09 AM by John »

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1254 on: July 29, 2014, 06:40:09 PM »
Paradox?

Dogs are useful tools but not infallible.

In the Shannon Matthews case a cadaver dog alerted but there were no bodies.


I do not doubt this but it does not address the question I asked.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2014, 11:56:40 AM by John »
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1255 on: August 01, 2014, 04:19:37 PM »
Paradox?

Dogs are useful tools but not infallible.

In the Shannon Matthews case a cadaver dog alerted but there were no bodies.

That was the one with the bed in which someone had died, wasn't it.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.


Offline slartibartfast

“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1258 on: August 01, 2014, 04:49:04 PM »
Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?

In McCann lala land specialist dogs alert to any substance one may care to name but none the less specialist dogs are used by many law enforcement agencies.
Perhaps posters might like to address that little paradox.

simple...specialist dogs are used to find evidence..blood...dead bodies ...body parts.. .drugs...explosives...when they find evidence this can be used in court as evidence

Offline Brietta

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1259 on: August 01, 2014, 05:22:28 PM »
That was the one with the bed in which someone had died, wasn't it.

I think the point is that despite the dogs alerting to what some refer to as the 'scent of death' - the police did not stop their search for a living child and Shannon was found. I won't say 'safe and well' as the conditions in which she was found leave a lot to be desired and had the search been delayed by a change in focus, who can tell what might have happened.

In the Shannon Mathews case the dogs did what they were trained to do ... but the humans then had to discover an explanation of why they had alerted as they did ... and in the interim continue working on the main objective which was locating the child who was fortunately alive.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....