How was I attacking you VS - I'm sorry you think that.
It was more just asking you how you can feel so strongly for JB being guilty of just circumstantial evidence.
Yet zero evidence of abduction in MM case - just think if he had all the backup/money and legal team the mccs had he may have not even gone to court in the first place. IMO
But JB only had legal aid.
There's obviously something not right for most intelligent posters on here not sure if he is guilty.
In the Bamber case there could only have been one of two scenarios. Based on all the evidence I concur with not only the jury in the original court case but also the numerous judges in subsequent appeals that the correct scenario was that Bamber dunnit. In order for me to believe otherwise would require for me to excuse Bamber for a long series behaviours and actions, and to blame anything else that I wasn’t able to explain or excuse on malevolent relatives or bent cops. That’s just far too many hoops to ask me to jump through. The McCann case is far more open ended than that, parental involvement is one (remote imo) possibility but the evidence against the parents is (as the PT officials admitted) just not there.
