Author Topic: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.  (Read 85012 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #300 on: June 21, 2014, 06:54:10 PM »
Its very obvious that the 48 questions is a real hornets nest.   @)(++(*
No, what the "48 Questions" is is just another of the many sticks with which to beat the McCanns.  It's a tool, a handy McCann-whacker, the reality is, in the real world, it's totally no longer of any consequence whatsoever. 

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #301 on: June 21, 2014, 07:03:46 PM »
No, what the "48 Questions" is is just another of the many sticks with which to beat the McCanns.  It's a tool, a handy McCann-whacker, the reality is, in the real world, it's totally no longer of any consequence whatsoever.

its all they have Alfred....

Offline Jean-Pierre

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #302 on: June 21, 2014, 07:10:16 PM »
Its very obvious that the 48 questions is a real hornets nest.   @)(++(*

John - sit down and read them with an open mind.


Offline Mr Gray

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #303 on: June 21, 2014, 07:12:21 PM »
Its very obvious that the 48 questions is a real hornets nest.   @)(++(*

so john...you claimed that Leicester police helped draw up the questions..is it true or is it rubbish

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #304 on: June 21, 2014, 07:16:33 PM »
so john...you claimed that Leicester police helped draw up the questions..is it true or is it rubbish

and if they did, what's your problem ?

Offline John

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #305 on: June 21, 2014, 07:20:10 PM »
before I accuse you of posting rubbish do you have any evidence that the questions were a joint exercise...if not I can call your post rubbish

Do you think LC were just there for the hell of it?

In respect of the arguido interviews, Amaral states in his book (page 84)

Quote from: Amaral - The truth of the lie
English and Portuguese investigators actively prepare the interviews and draw up a list of questions focussing particularly on the course of events on the night of the disappearance.



« Last Edit: June 21, 2014, 07:24:39 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #306 on: June 21, 2014, 07:20:53 PM »
Which case would that be? have they been charged with something?
I must have missed that while I was out hiding woodcutters axes.

they have been accused ..charged and found guilty

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #307 on: June 21, 2014, 07:26:16 PM »
Which court was that in and what was the charge?
Trial by social media, and the charge was "McCanns Dunnit, but we're not sure wot exactly".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #308 on: June 21, 2014, 07:27:23 PM »
Which court was that in and what was the charge?

you have obviously been asleep..well done Alfred

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #309 on: June 21, 2014, 07:36:14 PM »
Trial by social media, and the charge was "McCanns Dunnit, but we're not sure wot exactly".

Well for a start the mccanns left all three children, unnecessarily in peril, for several successive evenings in an unlocked apartment, or so they claim, and without independently verified checks.

They failed to return with their associates for the reenactment and otherwise did not fully cooperate with the investigation.

They hid behind the arguido status and let's not forget the dogs who only indicated in their apartment.

Claimed an abduction, for which there is only hearsay, and no physical evidence at all.

Claimed the shutters were jemmied through a family associate, and then strenuously denied it.

Set up a fund with friends and family, from which they used money to pay 2 mortgage payments , subsequently repayed.

'Discovered' religion, even though km's mother, said neither was a devout Catholic. The very same religion which doesn't allow IVF for it's devotees.

Good enough for starters ???
« Last Edit: June 21, 2014, 07:46:38 PM by stephen25000 »

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #310 on: June 21, 2014, 08:05:21 PM »
quote"
49. THE QUESTION SHE DID ANSWER:

Q.  Are you aware that in not answering the questions you are jeopardising the investigation, which seeks to discover what happened to your daughter?
A.  'Yes, if that’s what the investigation thinks.'" unquote

Now lets go and ask Team why they are suing Mr Amaral

um err em  well something about him writing a book which ....oh yes his book is affecting the search for their daughter...or words to that effect.. oh and the suffering of the family, apart from Maddie because "there is no evidence of her suffering-being harmed said Gerry.

Irony Much!
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #311 on: June 21, 2014, 10:26:45 PM »
Well for a start the mccanns left all three children, unnecessarily in peril, for several successive evenings in an unlocked apartment, or so they claim, and without independently verified checks.

They failed to return with their associates for the reenactment and otherwise did not fully cooperate with the investigation.

They hid behind the arguido status and let's not forget the dogs who only indicated in their apartment.

Claimed an abduction, for which there is only hearsay, and no physical evidence at all.

Claimed the shutters were jemmied through a family associate, and then strenuously denied it.

Set up a fund with friends and family, from which they used money to pay 2 mortgage payments , subsequently repayed.

'Discovered' religion, even though km's mother, said neither was a devout Catholic. The very same religion which doesn't allow IVF for it's devotees.

Good enough for starters ???
Thanks for perfectly illustrating "trial by media" on the charge "the McCanns dunnit but we're not sure wot exactly".

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #312 on: June 21, 2014, 10:48:07 PM »
Of course the right to silence is place because in many legal systems, it is seen as correct that a suspect should not be required to provide evidence against themselves.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Moderator

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #313 on: June 23, 2014, 03:22:58 PM »
before I accuse you of posting rubbish do you have any evidence that the questions were a joint exercise...if not I can call your post rubbish
Do you think LC were just there for the hell of it?

In respect of the arguido interviews, Amaral states in his book (page 84)

Quote from: Amaral - The truth of the lie
English and Portuguese investigators actively prepare the interviews and draw up a list of questions focussing particularly on the course of events on the night of the disappearance.


Bumped for Davel since he wrongly refers to it on another thread as not being answered. Context is Kate and Gerry McCann's arguido interviews.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #314 on: June 23, 2014, 03:30:31 PM »

I simply do not believe that The Leicester Constabulary were in any way involved in those spurious questions.  And I don't believe a word Amaral says.