Author Topic: Método 3, Marcos Aragão Correia and the campaign to discredit Gonçalo Amaral.  (Read 171360 times)

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

It tends to mean it is libel.

So you are saying it's libellous to state an opinion

Offline slartibartfast

So you are saying it's libellous to state an opinion

I've said before it depends what you say and how you say it.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

I've said before it depends what you say and how you say it.
So

I say I think amaral knew more about the torture

And amaral says he can prove Maddie died in the apartment and her parents covered it up

Are they both libel or is neither libel


And what qualifies you to decide
« Last Edit: December 29, 2016, 08:23:26 AM by davel »

Offline slartibartfast

So

I say I think amaral knew more about the torture

And amaral says he can prove Maddie died in the apartment and her parents covered it up

Are they both libel or is neither libel


And what qualifies you to decide

Yours is because you haven't said why you think that. Amaral doesn't post in here so we don't have to make that decision.

I am a mod, same as the others. We have to protect the forum.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Yours is because you haven't said why you think that. Amaral doesn't post in here so we don't have to make that decision.

I am a mod, same as the others. We have to protect the forum.

I think amaral knew all about the torture because his officers would have talked about it and torture was proved in court
« Last Edit: December 29, 2016, 08:43:06 AM by Slartibartfast »

Offline Mr Gray

Off topic.
So my opinion of your post is off topic

Offline slartibartfast

So my opinion of your post is off topic

Yes. You finally understand how to post your opinion without libel so why not leave it at that.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline slartibartfast

Please cut out the personal attacks.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline slartibartfast

Not really
Should have been removed in the first place
Perhaps that would be a wise move
And explain to her that personal attacks on fellow posters are not permitted

Let's not get into degrees of personal attacks. Back on topic please.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline John

After the trial of several PJ officers which saw Gonçalo Amaral found guilty of failing to report, Leonor Cipriano's lawyer, Marcos Aragão Correia, said: "Target was hit, Gonçalo Amaral was convicted".

Need we say any more?
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

stephen25000

  • Guest
After the trial of several PJ officers which saw Gonçalo Amaral found guilty of failing to report, Leonor Cipriano's lawyer, Marcos Aragão Correia, said: "Target was hit, Gonçalo Amaral was convicted".

Need we say any more?

Thank you John for that.

That was the quote I was looking for, from Correia. 8((()*/

Now let's see the inevitable denials.

Offline Mr Gray

After the trial of several PJ officers which saw Gonçalo Amaral found guilty of failing to report, Leonor Cipriano's lawyer, Marcos Aragão Correia, said: "Target was hit, Gonçalo Amaral was convicted".

Need we say any more?
Could we have a cite for the source of this quote

Offline Mr Gray

Thank you John for that.

That was the quote I was looking for, from Correia. 8((()*/

Now let's see the inevitable denials.
No denial just a request for the source
Quite reasonable
Without the source the quote is worthless
« Last Edit: December 29, 2016, 01:24:52 PM by davel »

stephen25000

  • Guest
I see it is on the 'why is there so much support for Leanor Cipriano from McCann supporters' thread.

Page 13 to be precise.

Google has it uses sometimes.  8)--))
« Last Edit: December 29, 2016, 02:06:08 PM by stephen25000 »

Offline Mr Gray

I see it is on the 'why is there so much support for Leanor Cipriano from McCann supporters' thread.

Page 13 to be precise.

Google has it uses sometimes. 8()-000(
Is that supposed to be a cite