Author Topic: Método 3, Marcos Aragão Correia and the campaign to discredit Gonçalo Amaral.  (Read 171207 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
The evidence is available on this thread and on the internet, in abundance.

Those who deny it are either :

1. In denial.

or

2. Representing the Mccanns.

Offline misty

I think Correia would have said "bullseye" rather than "the target has been hit" if he was aiming solely to discredit Amaral.  8(>((

stephen25000

  • Guest
I think Correia would have said "bullseye" rather than "the target has been hit" if he was aiming solely to discredit Amaral.  8(>((

So do you know Correia then Misty.

Sadie claims to.

perhaps she could invite him to post on this forum.

I would relish the opportunity to question him directly. 8)--))

Offline misty

So do you know Correia then Misty.

Sadie claims to.

perhaps she could invite him to post on this forum.

I would relish the opportunity to question him directly. 8)--))

Sometimes you do ask the most ridiculous questions.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Sometimes you do ask the most ridiculous questions.

Not really.

Offline misty

Not really.

You ask if I know him just because Sadie claims to? That's ridiculous imo.

Alfie

  • Guest
All the evidence is yet to be weighed. You and Alfie are both prejudging on the one hand whilst on the other purporting to be of above average intelligence ................................ &%+((£
It's a matter of methodology and principle not someones surname.
What do you mean by the evidence hasn't been weighed?  Surely the evidence was assessed at some point before the case was archived and the archiving report makes it clear that there was a lack of evidence of any crime committed by the McCanns.

stephen25000

  • Guest
You ask if I know him just because Sadie claims to? That's ridiculous imo.


You seem to be taking this personally.

After all, you have been attempting to defend Correia.

It seemed a perfectly reasonable question.

As I said several times to you and others of your group, you will not dissuade me or other people of  the  evidence that Correia was clearly engaged to go after Amaral.

Alfie

  • Guest
Which bit of "I don't know and neither do you" did you fail to understand ?
If you are as bright as you purport to be you should be able to work it out; it is hardly as complicated as curly dees now is it?. If you can't work it out you are dim if you can then one must assume you are here for the same reasons for which you enjoy accusing and denigrating others of on here, to whit:  to wum and troll.
You're incredibly rude aren't you?  Firstly I'd like a cite for me purporting to be bright.  As far as I'm concerned I have never made any boashut upl claim about my intelligence.  Secondly, "curly dees"?  No idea what that is.  Thirdly, I guess I must be dim as I can't work it out.  I can't work out why asking someone's opinion on a chat forum is anathema to people like you.  It seems we're not permitted to ask people what they think about things anymore.  Is that a new forum rule? 

Offline misty


You seem to be taking this personally.

After all, you have been attempting to defend Correia.

It seemed a perfectly reasonable question.

As I said several times to you and others of your group, you will not dissuade me or other people of  the  evidence that Correia was clearly engaged to go after Amaral.
You attempted to make it personal.
Neither you nor I know what Metado 3 employed Correia to do.
You are attacking Correia based on your interpretation of a supposed quote on a pro-Amaral blog. There is no proof he ever made the remark yet you are happy to believe same because it suits.
Amaral has, on many occasions, whinged that he was a scapegoat in his own country's political & judicial system plus the UK political system & latterly the McCanns. It wasn't Correia who convicted him.

stephen25000

  • Guest
You attempted to make it personal.
Neither you nor I know what Metado 3 employed Correia to do.
You are attacking Correia based on your interpretation of a supposed quote on a pro-Amaral blog. There is no proof he ever made the remark yet you are happy to believe same because it suits.
Amaral has, on many occasions, whinged that he was a scapegoat in his own country's political & judicial system plus the UK political system & latterly the McCanns. It wasn't Correia who convicted him.

You really are very slow on this.

I said this earlier, so just to help you.

The evidence of Correia's involvement , instructions and an employee of Metodo3, is not just based on one quote.

If you think it is, you are deluded.
« Last Edit: January 01, 2017, 06:45:16 PM by stephen25000 »

Offline misty

You really are very slow on this.

I said this earlier, so just to help you.

The evidence of Correia's involvement , instructions and an employee of Metodo3, is not just based on one quote.

If you think it is, you are deluded.

Then humour me. Please give me the relevant cite to Metado3's instructions to Correia & I will bow down to your superior intellect. Otherwise, please desist from calling me slow.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Then humour me. Please give me the relevant cite to Metado3's instructions to Correia & I will bow down to your superior intellect. Otherwise, please desist from calling me slow.

Perhaps you should read through the entire thread and links supplied.

There are a plethora out there.

Eventually you will comprehend that nothing you can type what is the truth of the matter.

Metodo3 employed Correia to go after Amaral,  the McCann's employed Metodo3.

Then we have the involvement of a certain Mr. Kennedy.

Offline misty

Perhaps you should read through the entire thread and links supplied.

There are a plethora out there.

Eventually you will comprehend that nothing you can type what is the truth of the matter.

Metodo3 employed Correia to go after Amaral,  the McCann's employed Metodo3.

Then we have the involvement of a certain Mr. Kennedy.

I've read the entire thread so please stop insulting my intelligence. Where is the link to the irrefutable proof?

stephen25000

  • Guest
I've read the entire thread so please stop insulting my intelligence. Where is the link to the irrefutable proof?

You really are being slow.

The evidence is there.

Now get over it.

Your typing won't change that.

So with caps lock on....


CORREIA WAS EMPLOYED BY METODO3 TO GO AFTER AMARAL ON BEHALF OF THE MCCANNS. 8((()*/