Author Topic: Smithman was carrying a child with long sleeved pyjamas.  (Read 50913 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lace

Re: Smithman was carrying a child with long sleeved pyjamas.
« Reply #75 on: September 05, 2014, 02:20:01 PM »
Jane mentions the pyjama's in her rogatory interview,   I have tried to copy and paste but can't seem to get just that part,   perhaps some one else could?

Offline Anna

Re: Smithman was carrying a child with long sleeved pyjamas.
« Reply #76 on: September 05, 2014, 02:21:27 PM »
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline Anna

Re: Smithman was carrying a child with long sleeved pyjamas.
« Reply #77 on: September 05, 2014, 02:34:22 PM »
Jane mentions the pyjama's in her rogatory interview,   I have tried to copy and paste but can't seem to get just that part,   perhaps some one else could?

L E I C E S T E R S H I R E C O N S T A B U L A R Y
Form MG15(T)
RECORD OF TAPE RECORDED INTERVIEW Police Exhibit No SVF/108A
Person Interviewed: Jane TANNER Number of Pages 46
Place of Interview: Force Headquarters Enderby Signature of Interviewing
Date of Interview: 08/04/08 Officer producing exhibit
Time Commenced: 1349 hours
Time Concluded: 1509 hours Duration of Interview: 80 minutes
Interviewing Officer(s) DC 4078 FERGUSON Tape Reference nos: SVF/108
Other Persons Present None

00.00.04 4078 “It is thirteen forty-eight on the afternoon of Tuesday the eighth of April two
thousand and eight. I am DC Sophie FERGUSON from Leicestershire Major Crime
Unit. And you are?”
in my head all the time and they are the two things that are still, are still, are still
there”.
4078 “And then think about the child again, as much as you can see of that child in that
split second, and tell me what you saw?”
Reply “Well, again, I mean, and this is, I think initially I couldn’t really bring, I could only
really remember the feet. But the day after, when we had, they, at the interview, the
person that was interviewing was really pushing me to try and, you know, remember
any more details, and the one thing that I could really think was, erm, a turn-up of
some description. And I don’t know whether this made it into my statement, but
there was, and this is the thing that convinces me it was her, there was, erm, sort of
the pyjamas were, there was some sort of, I thought it was a turn-up, but some sort of
design on the bottom of the pyjamas. And I did say it in my first statement and in my
second statement I can remember saying it again and, erm, the translator in there,
because I said ‘I don’t know whether this made it into my first statement or not’, but
the translator sort of went ‘Oh yes, I can remember you going like this’, because I
was moving my hands up, but I was sort of talking about something at the bottom of
the pyjamas. Because, from my own point of view, and I think, you know, ‘Oh was I

trying to’, I can think that I would think ‘Oh maybe a little girl would be wearing
pink pyjamas’, so, you know, if you were subconsciously putting things in your head,
I can think pink pyjamas, yes, but I wouldn’t think of some detail around the bottom
of the pyjamas as a specific thing to, to mention”.
00.36.39 4078 “And when you noticed the detail was it in any colour?”
Reply “I don’t, I didn’t know, I thought there was sort of a pink flowery bit on, bit on it, but,
no, I mean, the actual frill itself or turn-up, as I thought it was, I couldn’t think of the
colour, but I thought there was pink sort of flowery and sort of like liney bits on the
bottom, so”.
4078 “And, overall, what colour would you say the pyjama bottoms were?”
Reply “Erm, I can’t, I can’t remember, I mean, I, I can’t remember, well I can’t remember
now, but I think they were sort of whitey but with this, with this pattern on, but then
some pink. That’s, that’s what I thought at the time. It’s harder because now I know
what the pyjamas were so I can’t”.
4078 “It is very difficult”.
Reply “I think that is hard for me to actually”.
4078 “Yeah”.
Reply “To think now because I can, I can see them now”.
4078 “Because you know what actually they would have been if it had have been
Madeleine?”
Reply “Yeah, exactly, yeah, so I can’t really go back to thinking what they were”.
4078 “It is very difficult. What about the child’s feet then, what can you say about feet, if
anything, other than that they were uncovered?”
Reply “Just that they were uncovered and it looked like they were, you know, they seemed
to be asleep. I mean, they was definitely, you know, they were, as you would
imagine if the child was asleep. But, you know, that’s all, that’s all I can, like I say,
it was more just the, the fact they were, you know, you could see them”.

00.38.02 4078 “And the way you have held your hands like that, were the feet side-by-side like
that?”
Reply “Yeah”.
4078 “So the child would have been held on its back?”
Reply “Yeah”.
4078 “And you say that they were very relaxed as though they were asleep?”
Reply “Yeah, yeah, they were not, there was no, you know, there was no struggle or any,
yeah, they just looked like they were asleep. So, again, if you’d imagine somebody
had been just, you know, taken out of their bed or something you’d imagine they’d
be, but, no, they were very, you know, asleep”.
4078 “How long do you think it was that you had them in sight?”
Reply “Erm, phew, not that, I mean, I did, I think I did go like that after they’d gone, so it
probably wasn’t, phew, it’d be seconds, wouldn’t it, it’d be just like, phew, a few
seconds and then as I got to the top I think I went like that, which I think is when I
noticed more that they were walking quite quick. But, no, I mean, not, you know,
not, not that long at all”.
4078 “I know this seems like an obvious question, which I think I know the answer to,
because I’ve seen the artist’s impression, did you see the man’s face?”
Reply “No, no, not, no, I mean, just the hair, well not, not that I could remember to give
details, give details to”.
4078 “How far away from you were they at the closest point?”
Reply “Phew, as, I mean, it’s hard to, sort of thing, but I think I was sort of halfway, it’s
probably sort of five metres, I mean, I’m trying to sort of think in terms of this room,
but sort of probably just further than that wall, probably sort of five to ten metres id’
say, if, I don’t know how far it is to there, but”.
4078 “I would say probably about, I am just guessing, but two and a half to three metres?”

“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline Anna

Re: Smithman was carrying a child with long sleeved pyjamas.
« Reply #78 on: September 05, 2014, 02:54:56 PM »
If there was an accomplice parked up say in the car park opposite mini reception for example, a position where they could see the comings and goings, could his exit have been hampered by the Gerry/Jez chat causing a delay and a potential problem for the carrier?

The possibility of that scenario has crossed my mind many times

It seems the checks were done on the hour or half hour approx, so if they had been watching they wouldnt expect, the movements that were, on that night occuring between 9.10 and 9.15.
« Last Edit: September 05, 2014, 03:03:20 PM by Anna »
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline pegasus

Re: Smithman was carrying a child with long sleeved pyjamas.
« Reply #79 on: September 07, 2014, 11:14:23 PM »
My prediction is that the Smith sighting will be ruled out.
I think it is likely it was an innocent non-english-speaking dad who parked just north of sighting then carried his sleeping daughter to home just south of sighting.
This explains why he didn't answer Mrs S's greeting, and explains the closed eyes, and explains why the sleeves seen by Miss S are completely the wrong length for it to be the missing child.
« Last Edit: September 07, 2014, 11:19:24 PM by pegasus »

Offline sadie

Re: Smithman was carrying a child with long sleeved pyjamas.
« Reply #80 on: September 08, 2014, 12:28:37 AM »
My prediction is that the Smith sighting will be ruled out.
I think it is likely it was an innocent non-english-speaking dad who parked just north of sighting then carried his sleeping daughter to home just south of sighting.
This explains why he didn't answer Mrs S's greeting, and explains the closed eyes, and explains why the sleeves seen by Miss S are completely the wrong length for it to be the missing child.
That is a possibility, but the way that he seemed to be avioding the Smiths makes me think not.  That is only a gut feeling, but there seemed to be no interaction at all between Smithman and any part of the Smith family.  Most people, have eye contact, smile or nod ... some reaction to others .... but seems not with Smithman.

Also why didn't he come forward?

Offline pegasus

Re: Smithman was carrying a child with long sleeved pyjamas.
« Reply #81 on: September 08, 2014, 01:57:20 AM »
That is a possibility, but the way that he seemed to be avioding the Smiths makes me think not.  That is only a gut feeling, but there seemed to be no interaction at all between Smithman and any part of the Smith family.  Most people, have eye contact, smile or nod ... some reaction to others .... but seems not with Smithman.

Also why didn't he come forward?
Because IMO there has never been a poster appeal in portuguese language in PDL which describes the sighting and gives its location (the posters put up in July 2014 certainly don't).
As well as the long sleeves - another thing which IMO makes this sighting likely to be not relevant, is that one witness saw closed eyes -  that fits neither the live abduction scenario, nor the other scenario.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Smithman was carrying a child with long sleeved pyjamas.
« Reply #82 on: September 08, 2014, 02:58:59 AM »
Because IMO there has never been a poster appeal in portuguese language in PDL which describes the sighting and gives its location (the posters put up in July 2014 certainly don't).
As well as the long sleeves - another thing which IMO makes this sighting likely to be not relevant, is that one witness saw closed eyes -  that fits neither the live abduction scenario, nor the other scenario.

Pull the other one. Smithman has never heard of Madeleine McCann in 7 years and that's why he's never come forward. If you believe that you will believe anything the McCanns say - Oh sorry you do and that's the only reason why you discard the long sleeves. It would look unusual and stand out if Smithman was carrying a child  with only short sleeves on at that time of night and there's your answer. Did the long sleeves stay with her? probably not they were dumped in a bin with her short sleeve pyjamas underneath. If she was found she would be discovered with short sleeves on. Smart? No it's very simple to do like changing your trousers and taking a jacket off.
« Last Edit: September 08, 2014, 03:01:25 AM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline sadie

Re: Smithman was carrying a child with long sleeved pyjamas.
« Reply #83 on: September 08, 2014, 10:41:57 AM »
Because IMO there has never been a poster appeal in portuguese language in PDL which describes the sighting and gives its location (the posters put up in July 2014 certainly don't).
As well as the long sleeves - another thing which IMO makes this sighting likely to be not relevant, is that one witness saw closed eyes -  that fits neither the live abduction scenario, nor the other scenario.
[/b]

I dont follow that Pegasus.  Drugged could well mean eyes closed and I think it highly probable that Madeleine was drugged before lifting .

Marilyn of Switzerland (pfa2} always thought that Madeleine was tazered.  I know very little about tazering ... do you ?   Would that mean eyes closed or open?

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Smithman was carrying a child with long sleeved pyjamas.
« Reply #84 on: September 08, 2014, 01:09:35 PM »

If Maddie really was abducted, and the Smith's sighting wasn't Gerry, then Kate had absoloutely no reason to lie/mislead about the details of the 2 sightings....


But she did, it's here for all to see......


Madeleine Was Here (7th May 2009)

Voice over: 'The most likely sighting of Madeleine was by Jane Tanner, a friend of the McCanns.'
'In the files Kate believes another witness statement from an Irish family describes a very similar sighting to Jane's.'

KM: 'There's actually quite a lot of similarities & it does beg the question, I mean how many people carry their children on a cold night not covered, y'know, nothing on their arms or their feet. no blanket.

'Now either there's been 2 people carrying children in that way, who haven't come forward to eliminate themselves or potentially they are related.'

Interviewer: But you think that child is Madeleine?

KM: I think there's a good chance it could be Madeleine, certainly the description there sounds to me like Madeleine.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=fRQQWmpiO3s#t=265


McCanns on Oprah (4th May 2009)

Gerry : "Jane went to check on her children and it was at that point she was just passed us going up to the corner and she saw a man carrying a young girl with almo.. she described independently the pyjamas that Madeleine had on.."

Kate: "The child was barefoot and bare armed..."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=xNI5up44Nho#t=820


*Jane Tanner didn't see the child's arms...


The McCann's reconstruction has Smithman carrying the child in a manner which was not as described in the Smith family witness statements. Instead, it depicts him carrying the child in the manner of Bundleman, as was described by Jane Tanner, in her sighting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=na4aBr5PTYY#t=348



Crimewatch Reconstruction (October 2013)

Smithman's child is shown wearing long sleeves, as was described in Aiofe's witness statement.

The manner of carrying is as described in the Smith's witness statements.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=OZ8jmdWlB8Y#t=1432



There is no innocent reason for Kate, & the McCanns own reconstruction, to have done that.
« Last Edit: September 10, 2014, 07:56:09 PM by Wonderfulspam »
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline John

Re: Smithman was carrying a child with long sleeved pyjamas.
« Reply #85 on: September 11, 2014, 06:55:31 PM »
Madeleine was wearing short sleeved pyjamas according to Kate and Aoife Smith was adamant that the kid she saw being carried down town just after 10pm had long sleeved ones on so that sort of rules Smithman out does it not?

Jane for her part never saw the child's arms but her e-fit reveals pyjama trousers with frilly turn-ups, something which again Madeleine wasn't wearing according to Kate.

So are both sightings red herrings?
« Last Edit: September 18, 2014, 02:18:26 AM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Smithman was carrying a child with long sleeved pyjamas.
« Reply #86 on: September 11, 2014, 06:58:32 PM »
Madeleine was wearing short sleeved pyjamas according to Kate and Aoife Smith was adamant that the kid she saw being carried down town just after 10pm had long sleeved ones on so that sort of rules Smithman out does it not?

Was Aoifee adamant...does anyone know what her exact words were during her statement

Offline John

Re: Smithman was carrying a child with long sleeved pyjamas.
« Reply #87 on: September 11, 2014, 07:01:52 PM »
Was Aoifee adamant...does anyone know what her exact words were during her statement

Witnesses statements can be very revealing. Had Aoife not noticed the long sleeved pj's she wouldn't have mentioned them so the fact that she mentioned it at all is a very strong indicator that that is in fact what she saw.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Smithman was carrying a child with long sleeved pyjamas.
« Reply #88 on: September 11, 2014, 07:08:43 PM »
Witnesses statements can be very revealing. Had Aoife not noticed the long sleeved pj's she wouldn't have mentioned them so the fact that she mentioned it at all is a very strong indicator that that is in fact what she saw.

Smithman knew he was probably going to be seen so how could he not connect the sighting to Maddy. I will put her in long sleves. Easy!  But i will just throw these long sleeves away in a bin and leave in her short sleeves (hidden underneath long sleeved top) so if she is found Smithman can't be the one.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2014, 07:11:03 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline John

Re: Smithman was carrying a child with long sleeved pyjamas.
« Reply #89 on: September 11, 2014, 07:16:20 PM »
The words which are attributed to Aoife are as follows:

Tinha uma blusa também clara, de mangas compridas.

Which translates literally as, 'Also had a light/clear blouse with long sleeves.'
« Last Edit: September 18, 2014, 02:18:34 AM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.