Author Topic: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?  (Read 434136 times)

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mercury

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #390 on: April 22, 2015, 09:37:35 PM »
my impression on whether chloroform or anything else was used seems to be without any evidence at all so I wonder why people are even bothering to talk about it, as its 100 per cent speculation in the event and nothing else

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #391 on: April 23, 2015, 09:23:59 AM »
my impression on whether chloroform or anything else was used seems to be without any evidence at all so I wonder why people are even bothering to talk about it, as its 100 per cent speculation in the event and nothing else

It's not about evidence, it's about belief. If you believe the parent's story the shutters and window were open. No reason can be found for that, so one has to be invented. Handily, it also explains why opening the shutters didn't wake the children; they were chloroformed! Of course this doesn't explain why they continued to sleep on and on and on later.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #392 on: April 23, 2015, 09:49:15 AM »
It's not about evidence, it's about belief. If you believe the parent's story the shutters and window were open. No reason can be found for that, so one has to be invented. Handily, it also explains why opening the shutters didn't wake the children; they were chloroformed! Of course this doesn't explain why they continued to sleep on and on and on later.

Perhaps it is about "belief" ... a belief shared by the Portuguese Attorney General ~ now there is a very important legal title ~ top notch I would think.

It also seems to be a "belief" shared with the professional investigators presently working on Madeleine McCann's case who have found no evidence to implicate her parents or their friends to her disappearance ... but who are it seems following the evidence which has led to people of interest.

Course you will know so much better than these professionals who have all the available evidence to hand.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #393 on: April 23, 2015, 09:51:51 AM »
It's not about evidence, it's about belief. If you believe the parent's story the shutters and window were open. No reason can be found for that, so one has to be invented. Handily, it also explains why opening the shutters didn't wake the children; they were chloroformed! Of course this doesn't explain why they continued to sleep on and on and on later.

we have gone over again and again why the children would sleep...children who are in a deep sleep...who are worn out from playing all day can be difficult to wake...I know from experience

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #394 on: April 23, 2015, 10:15:48 AM »
we have gone over again and again why the children would sleep...children who are in a deep sleep...who are worn out from playing all day can be difficult to wake...I know from experience

So why do you think Kate was, allegedly, worried enough about their non-responsive state to voice her concern to a GNR officer on the night ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #395 on: April 23, 2015, 10:25:06 AM »
we have gone over again and again why the children would sleep...children who are in a deep sleep...who are worn out from playing all day can be difficult to wake...I know from experience

Of course you do.

You've had many experiences, or so you say.

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #396 on: April 23, 2015, 10:26:11 AM »
So why do you think Kate was, allegedly, worried enough about their non-responsive state to voice her concern to a GNR officer on the night ?

so davel doesnt  see anything  wrong with 2 toddlers being  unresponsive? basically??

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #397 on: April 23, 2015, 10:27:21 AM »
so davel doesnt  see anything  wrong with 2 toddlers being  unresponsive? basically??

He's admitted to doing it himself. 8(0(*

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #398 on: April 23, 2015, 10:30:52 AM »
Of course you do.

You've had many experiences, or so you say.

"Pain of a Troubled Life": Alison Krauss and Union Station; "I've lived a dozen lifetimes in twenty-some-odd years .."
 ?>)()<
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #399 on: April 23, 2015, 11:06:46 AM »
He's admitted to doing it himself. 8(0(*

you need to read the post again
« Last Edit: April 23, 2015, 12:50:22 PM by Admin »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #400 on: April 23, 2015, 11:07:36 AM »
so davel doesnt  see anything  wrong with 2 toddlers being  unresponsive? basically??

not if they are just in a deep sleep ...absolutely not

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #401 on: April 23, 2015, 11:08:41 AM »
So why do you think Kate was, allegedly, worried enough about their non-responsive state to voice her concern to a GNR officer on the night ?

you have to see the remark in context...at that time kate was in a blind panic

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #402 on: April 23, 2015, 11:23:10 AM »
you have to see the remark in context...at that time kate was in a blind panic

This is the context as written in Madeleine :

'
I wandered into the children’s bedroom several times to check on Sean and Amelie. They were both lying on their fronts in a kind of crouch, with their heads turned sideways and their knees tucked under their tummies. In spite of the noise and lights and general pandemonium, they hadn’t stirred. They’d always been sound sleepers, but this seemed unnatural. Scared for them, too, I placed the palms of my hands on their backs to check for chest movement, basically, for some sign of life. Had Madeleine been given some kind of sedative to keep her quiet? Had the twins, too?  (Snip)

(Snip)
We tried to explain what had happened. David reiterated his concerns about roadblocks and border notification and I reported my fears that all three children could have been sedated. A lady called Sílvia, who worked at the Ocean Club, had arrived to help out with translation. We learned later that she was the maintenance and services manager. I remember her telling me that she had two grown-up daughters herself. She was very kind and I was glad of her help and support.'

Of course Silvia Batista nor any other police officer mention in their statements Kate expressing her concerns about sedation but that's for another thread.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Carana

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #403 on: April 23, 2015, 11:37:36 AM »
This is the context as written in Madeleine :

'
I wandered into the children’s bedroom several times to check on Sean and Amelie. They were both lying on their fronts in a kind of crouch, with their heads turned sideways and their knees tucked under their tummies. In spite of the noise and lights and general pandemonium, they hadn’t stirred. They’d always been sound sleepers, but this seemed unnatural. Scared for them, too, I placed the palms of my hands on their backs to check for chest movement, basically, for some sign of life. Had Madeleine been given some kind of sedative to keep her quiet? Had the twins, too?  (Snip)

(Snip)
We tried to explain what had happened. David reiterated his concerns about roadblocks and border notification and I reported my fears that all three children could have been sedated. A lady called Sílvia, who worked at the Ocean Club, had arrived to help out with translation. We learned later that she was the maintenance and services manager. I remember her telling me that she had two grown-up daughters herself. She was very kind and I was glad of her help and support.'

Of course Silvia Batista nor any other police officer mention in their statements Kate expressing her concerns about sedation but that's for another thread.

No, but the forensic people did apparently look to see if there was any obvious evidence of sedation lying around. And sniffed the pillow. I still don't understand why the PJ didn't test the twins.


Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?
« Reply #404 on: April 23, 2015, 11:40:22 AM »
we have gone over again and again why the children would sleep...children who are in a deep sleep...who are worn out from playing all day can be difficult to wake...I know from experience

You can say it however many times you want, it means nothing to me, or to three qualified doctors;

Asked if the twins had been drugged, she said on BBC Radio 4's Woman's Hour today: 'On the night I just remember the twins lying in the cot and not moving - with lights going on and people moving around.
'There was a lot of noise and they just didn't move and I remember several times checking for chest movements. I did feel it was a bit strange that they were not moving let alone waking up.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1386093/Kate-McCann-Kidnapper-drugged-twins-night-Madeleine-taken.html#ixzz3Y7o7RlOE
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

When questioned if the twins woke up during the searches in the apartment, he replied negatively. When they were taken to another apartment he does not know if they woke, as he did not take them. When asked, he says that this was not normal, but he can find no reason for it happening. Yet, at that moment he thought that the twins might have been drugged by the possible abductor, even if he only mentioned this to the Police several days later.
Processos Vol IV, pages 2569-2578
Location: CID Portimão

No, and that was the other thing, she kept going into the twins, she kept putting her hands on the twins to check they were breathing, she was very much concerned in checking that they were okay. But they were okay, I mean, they were fine, they didn't, they were asleep, but at the time it did seem weird, I remember thinking, you know, when the Police came they turned the lights on, there was loads of noise, obviously from the moment Kate discovered that Madeleine was gone, the screaming and the shouting and there was a lot of noise and they, they didn't, you know, so much as blink'.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/FIONA-PAYNE-ROGATORY.htm






Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0