Is there any hard evidence whatsoever in the Madeleine McCann case?

[Brietta]

Did anyone see Eddie running around  a kitchen holding a juicy morsel in his mouth? I must have missed it.

I WILL need a video confirmation or any other for this to take you seriously Brietta, thanks in advance.

    So you've never seen Eddie with the kebab in his mouth??  Just check it out on the video in the forum library, as you probably already know, you_ will_ see_ it_ there.

You should probably have worked out by now that I neither lie nor post anything I cannot substantiate ... but if my word isn't good enough for you ... how about this man's ...

Apartment 5 D
We've put the victim recovery dog through this apartment, the only interest has been in some food that he has found, other than that there is no interest in anything that he has been taught to tell me that he has found.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES.htm

[stephen25000]

    So you've never seen Eddie with the kebab in his mouth??  Just check it out on the video in the forum library, as you probably already know, you_ will_ see_ it_ there.

You should probably have worked out by now that I neither lie nor post anything I cannot substantiate ... but if my word isn't good enough for you ... how about this man's ...

Apartment 5 D
We've put the victim recovery dog through this apartment, the only interest has been in some food that he has found, other than that there is no interest in anything that he has been taught to tell me that he has found.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES.htm

You never lie ? &%+((£

How can you substantiate that ?

[G-Unit]

    So you've never seen Eddie with the kebab in his mouth??  Just check it out on the video in the forum library, as you probably already know, you_ will_ see_ it_ there.

You should probably have worked out by now that I neither lie nor post anything I cannot substantiate ... but if my word isn't good enough for you ... how about this man's ...

Apartment 5 D
We've put the victim recovery dog through this apartment, the only interest has been in some food that he has found, other than that there is no interest in anything that he has been taught to tell me that he has found.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES.htm

And your point is? Did he alert? No, so this behaviour is immaterial. It's not evidence and not relevant.

[Brietta]

And your point is? Did he alert? No, so this behaviour is immaterial. It's not evidence and not relevant.

                                                   It is very relevant indeed. 

A VRD should not under any circumstances 'mouth' items at a crime scene.  We have seen Eddie continually  lift items which might have constituted evidence in his mouth.

[mercury]

    So you've never seen Eddie with the kebab in his mouth??  Just check it out on the video in the forum library, as you probably already know, you_ will_ see_ it_ there.

You should probably have worked out by now that I neither lie nor post anything I cannot substantiate ... but if my word isn't good enough for you ... how about this man's ...

Apartment 5 D
We've put the victim recovery dog through this apartment, the only interest has been in some food that he has found, other than that there is no interest in anything that he has been taught to tell me that he has found.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES.htm

What is so funny?

Maybe I need to go to Specsavers.

I couldn't see anywhere in the video where Eddie was running all around any kitchen with a juicy kebab in his mouth. Frankly, your argument that Eddie alerts to food is, if not a lie, then questionable at best.

Eddie may have shown interest as a "dog" to various smells, but this is not the same as "alerting". This applies to your previous comment about roadkill too. He has never alerted to roadkill OR "juicy kebabs". Seeing as you are using Mr Grime as an expert to quote as back up for your statements,  you should already have known all this.

As an aside, the video in the video library which I watched is NOT the original video as placed on the website mccannfiles.com some years ago. The order of the dog searches has been changed. Where is the original?
perhaps I can find the kebab in that one.

[stephen25000]

What is so funny?

Maybe I need to go to Specsavers.

I couldn't see anywhere in the video where Eddie was running all around any kitchen with a juicy kebab in his mouth. Frankly, your argument that Eddie alerts to food is, if not a lie, then questionable at best.

Eddie may have shown interest as a "dog" to various smells, but this is not the same as "alerting". This applies to your previous comment about roadkill too. He has never alerted to roadkill OR "juicy kebabs". Seeing as you are using Mr Grime as an expert to quote as back up for your statements,  you should already have known all this.

As an aside, the video in the video library which I watched is NOT the original video as placed on the website mccannfiles.com some years ago. The order of the dog searches has been changed. Where is the original?
perhaps I can find the kebab in that one.

It is quite rematprkable how many mccann supporters have become 'google dog handling experts'.

Now if the dogs don't bother themthem, why all the fuss. &%+((£

[pegasus]

It is quite rematprkable how many mccann supporters have become 'google dog handling experts'.

Now if the dogs don't bother themthem, why all the fuss. &%+((£

It will backfire. The GBP will not fall for "the alerts are rubbish".

The GBP have seen the high value placed on skilled dogs by UK police in other cases.

For example in the ongoing case in York, this type of dog has been deployed many times, and never once has anyone claimed the dogs or their handlers are rubbish.

[mercury]

It is quite rematprkable how many mccann supporters have become 'google dog handling experts'.

Now if the dogs don't bother themthem, why all the fuss. &%+((£

Qute. Gerry McCann has told them that cadaver dogs are incredibly unreliable, whch is a porkie at best.

[Brietta]

What is so funny?

Maybe I need to go to Specsavers.

I couldn't see anywhere in the video where Eddie was running all around any kitchen with a juicy kebab in his mouth. Frankly, your argument that Eddie alerts to food is, if not a lie, then questionable at best.

Eddie may have shown interest as a "dog" to various smells, but this is not the same as "alerting". This applies to your previous comment about roadkill too. He has never alerted to roadkill OR "juicy kebabs". Seeing as you are using Mr Grime as an expert to quote as back up for your statements,  you should already have known all this.

As an aside, the video in the video library which I watched is NOT the original video as placed on the website mccannfiles.com some years ago. The order of the dog searches has been changed. Where is the original?
perhaps I can find the kebab in that one.

                                                &%+((£     Where did I say Eddie alerted to food?

[Brietta]

It will backfire. The GBP will not fall for "the alerts are rubbish".

The GBP have seen the high value placed on skilled dogs by UK police in other cases.

For example in the ongoing case in York, this type of dog has been deployed many times, and never once has anyone claimed the dogs or their handlers are rubbish.

The purpose of dogs is to indicate where evidence can be found;  please indicate what evidence was found in Praia da Luz by either the Portuguese or the British animals.

[stephen25000]

Qute. Gerry McCann has told them that cadaver dogs are incredibly unreliable, whch is a porkie at best.

Perhaps Gerry should have asked the dogs, not Sandra.

[mercury]

Perhaps Gerry should have asked the dogs, not Sandra.

I think he would rather get herpes

just quote abominable for a man of science to lie about science

[stephen25000]

I think he would rather get herpes

just quote abominable for a man of science to lie about science

They both tries to dismiss the dogs as have their supporters on here and elsewhere.

They they can't stop discussing it.

[mercury]

They both tries to dismiss the dogs as have their supporters on here and elsewhere.

They they can't stop discussing it.

It's probably because it's serious evidence NOT to be dismissed

[misty]

They both tries to dismiss the dogs as have their supporters on here and elsewhere.

They they can't stop discussing it.

Perhaps you would rather we discussed the latest myth paraded as proof it was the parentswotdunit -  WayBackMachine?