Sadie's theory.

[faithlilly]

My investigations looked forwrd; they were about where she was taken to afterwards and who was responsible.   Not the minutiae of an abduction; that was the past.    I soon found stuff that no-one else had even thought of looking for.

Compelling stuff, but I always know that I could be wrong .... However so much stuff that backed everything up makes me think that I got the essential part of it right.

Have you ever thought of launching a rescue attempt if you know where Madeleine is ? Be a shame not to stop her suffering if you can. I’m sure you’d get support from supporters on here who are all as eager to find her as you.

[barrier]

I am not going into it all again, but I have a multitude of FACTS, co-incidences galore and it seems as tho SY might well be following much of my (huge) theory, which fits together like a massive jigsaw.  Remember, they made a piont of showing my small and large folders on Crimewatch and making a positive statement at the same time 

That particular scene on Crimewatch appears to have been wiped from the internet, as do several photos etc that indicate other things.  Strange how pertinent photos, videos and facts that prove things against certain parts of the PJ disappear, dontcha think ?

All these things point to Madeleine being alive in 2012, including photos of a little girl I believe to be her.   These were taken exactly where I had worked out she was likely to be.  Precisely there. 

I knew the place and went searching there and found what I was looking for


Hope that answers your question.


Now if she was alive in 2012, then only an idiot would think she died in 2007. 
It is up to you whether you believe me, or not, and as i have my hands tied and mouth zippered atm, I cant enlighten you any more.

If she was alive in 2012 who in their right mind would bring her back to the waste ground which SY in its well publicised searches went looking at.What else were they looking for with cadaver dogs?

[slartibartfast]

No need to.

My investigations looked forwrd; they were about where she was taken to afterwards and who was responsible.   Not the minutiae of an abduction; that was the past.    I soon found stuff that no-one else had even thought of looking for.

Compelling stuff, but I always know that I could be wrong .... However so much stuff that backed everything up makes me think that I got the essential part of it right.

IMO you shouldn’t bring your unsubstantiated and unexplained theories on this forum. It is impossible to discuss them as you do not provide enough information and it also brings the forum and especially the supporters case into disrepute.

[Erngath]

IMO you shouldn’t bring your unsubstantiated and unexplained theories on this forum. It is impossible to discuss them as you do not provide enough information and it also brings the forum and especially the supporters case into disrepute.

In my opinion, Sadie is as entitled as any other member of this forum to put her theories as long as those theories are not libellous.
It is my opinion that another theory is being discussed on the forum which does include posts which are libellous.
Sadie always adds that her theories are in her own opinion and adds that anyone is free to disagree with her.
She has the courage of her convictions and knows she opens herself to adverse criticism.

She is obviously a learned, well educated lady who has a wide range of knowledge.
She also is very quick to apologize if shown to be wrong.


It is my belief that the forum has a wide and diverse range of opinions and abilities.
Everyone is entitled to post within forum rules.
I feel your post was very unfair.

[faithlilly]

In my opinion, Sadie is as entitled as any other member of this forum to put her theories as long as those theories are not libellous.
It is my opinion that another theory is being discussed on the forum which does include posts which are libellous.
Sadie always adds that her theories are in her own opinion and adds that anyone is free to disagree with her.
She has the courage of her convictions and knows she opens herself to adverse criticism.

She is obviously a learned, well educated lady who has a wide range of knowledge.
She also is very quick to apologize if shown to be wrong.


It is my belief hat the forum has a wide and diverse range of opinions.

I feel your post was very unfair.

Tell me Erngath do you think Sadie’s folders were shown on Crimewatch ? Do you think the footage was then wiped from the internet ? Do you think that she has suffered a violent attack because of her interest in this case ?

[Erngath]

Tell me Erngath do you think Sadie’s folders were shown on Crimewatch ? Do you think the footage was then wiped from the internet ? Do you think that she has suffered a violent attack because of her interest in this case ?

Why are you asking me these questions?

[kizzy]

In my opinion, Sadie is as entitled as any other member of this forum to put her theories as long as those theories are not libellous.
It is my opinion that another theory is being discussed on the forum which does include posts which are libellous.
Sadie always adds that her theories are in her own opinion and adds that anyone is free to disagree with her.
She has the courage of her convictions and knows she opens herself to adverse criticism.

She is obviously a learned, well educated lady who has a wide range of knowledge.
She also is very quick to apologize if shown to be wrong.


It is my belief that the forum has a wide and diverse range of opinions and abilities.
Everyone is entitled to post within forum rules.
I feel your post was very unfair.

Where is imo in post 190 - where she also says anyone who does not believe in the abduction are idiots

Don't you think that post unfair...and insulting.

[G-Unit]

In my opinion, Sadie is as entitled as any other member of this forum to put her theories as long as those theories are not libellous.
It is my opinion that another theory is being discussed on the forum which does include posts which are libellous.
Sadie always adds that her theories are in her own opinion and adds that anyone is free to disagree with her.
She has the courage of her convictions and knows she opens herself to adverse criticism.

She is obviously a learned, well educated lady who has a wide range of knowledge.
She also is very quick to apologize if shown to be wrong.


It is my belief that the forum has a wide and diverse range of opinions and abilities.
Everyone is entitled to post within forum rules.
I feel your post was very unfair.

I have shared my theory with the Policia Judiciaria and they seemed very interested in what I had to say. I believe they are following leads which fit in with what I said. I can't say any more, obviously. I may be wrong but I remain hopeful that I have helped them to progress their enquiries. 

[Robittybob1]

There are many theories, and it takes a lot of effort to come to a comprehensive theory.  I'd like to see more discussion on theories not less TBH.

[Miss Taken Identity]

I have shared my theory with the Policia Judiciaria and they seemed very interested in what I had to say. I believe they are following leads which fit in with what I said. I can't say any more, obviously. I may be wrong but I remain hopeful that I have helped them to progress their enquiries.

Does it involve santa? and have you been threatened by Templars since taking this courageous step?

[G-Unit]

Does it involve santa? and have you been threatened by Templars since taking this courageous step?

Well, I can't prove anything but sometimes things I write on the internet mysteriously disappear. I also saw a huge spider in amongst my plants in the garden the other day. How did it get there, I wonder?

[slartibartfast]

There are many theories, and it takes a lot of effort to come to a comprehensive theory.  I'd like to see more discussion on theories not less TBH.

There is a big difference between a theory and hints at perpetrators, motives and methods.

[kizzy]

There are many theories, and it takes a lot of effort to come to a comprehensive theory.  I'd like to see more discussion on theories not less TBH.

Well that's a bit one sided, isn't it -  the only theory that can be discussed is the how maddie was abducted

Any theory posted about the mccanns  being involved -  are removed.

[Robittybob1]

There is a big difference between a theory and hints at perpetrators, motives and methods.

I agree, that is why I said comprehensive theory.

[Erngath]

I agree, that is why I said comprehensive theory.

I have yet to read any theory involving the McCanns  which is remotely comprehensive. IMO .