Sadie's theory.

[Gertrude]

according to experts...despatches programme...not difficult at all......Have you not herad about all the wells around PDL...very easy to vanish a child

As pathfinder said, not easy in the timeline given by the McCanns and friends.

   The experts in the despatches programme were hardly going to go in to detail of how one of the McCanns or tapas lot could have been involved were they?   I suspect like Colin Sutton, they were asked to come up with likely scenarios for each possible theory ( trafficking, abduction, wandered ) and then the media select what they want to present and some parts not at all.

    With the stranger abduction theory we still have the vast problem of that fitting into the timeline given. Just because there are places a child could have been hidden doesn't mean it's likely someone got into 5a, picked up a child and got out between parents coming up and down the road, and then hid the child without anyone noticing at all, no crying Madeleine, no crying twins - all in the short time available. 
   

[Miss Taken Identity]

There were more checks going on that night than any other. Only the village idiot would attempt it with 3 children in one room with regular checks going on in and around that apartment.

Yes, it seems weird that this once only night MBM was checked a few times more,  and had to physical checks -one for the 'doting dad' moment and the other  from the mother who claims she was abducted.  seems incredible.

[jassi]

That is about right.  I'd say if she was hidden in a well it was a local person.

Are you talking about temporary storage or permanent disposal?

[jassi]

Yes, it seems weird that this once only night MBM was checked a few times more,  and had to physical checks -one for the 'doting dad' moment and the other  from the mother who claims she was abducted. seems incredible.

That's because it is - IMO

[Robittybob1]

Are you talking about temporary storage or permanent disposal?

The wells I've seen are really deep.  If a body is thrown in there it was there for good IMO.

[Robittybob1]

As pathfinder said, not easy in the timeline given by the McCanns and friends.

   The experts in the despatches programme were hardly going to go in to detail of how one of the McCanns or tapas lot could have been involved were they?   I suspect like Colin Sutton, they were asked to come up with likely scenarios for each possible theory ( trafficking, abduction, wandered ) and then the media select what they want to present and some parts not at all.

    With the stranger abduction theory we still have the vast problem of that fitting into the timeline given. Just because there are places a child could have been hidden doesn't mean it's likely someone got into 5a, picked up a child and got out between parents coming up and down the road, and then hid the child without anyone noticing at all, no crying Madeleine, no crying twins - all in the short time available. 
 

Why not.  If Madeleine had been wandering it would have taken only seconds for someone to snatch her.

[Brietta]

The topic of this thread is "Sadie's Theory" please stay on topic as off topic posts will be deleted.  Thank you

[jassi]

The wells I've seen are really deep.  If a body is thrown in there it was there for good IMO.

OK, so would you accept temporary storage elsewhere while a permanent site is sought as a possibility ?

[Gertrude]

Why not.  If Madeleine had been wandering it would have taken only seconds for someone to snatch her.

'Why not' is not really the right question I feel, it is about being in the realms of possibility. Theories where a child just happened to wander out down dark steps and a predator was prowling around on the off chance, in between parents walking up and down and said off chance predator manages to hide the child without a trace is getting more and more complex and less probable IMO.

   If this is Off topic I apologise, I would be glad to get back to Sadie's theory but it hasn't really been explained here on this thread. I believe it is based around a planned stranger abduction?

[Mr Gray]

As pathfinder said, not easy in the timeline given by the McCanns and friends.

   The experts in the despatches programme were hardly going to go in to detail of how one of the McCanns or tapas lot could have been involved were they?   I suspect like Colin Sutton, they were asked to come up with likely scenarios for each possible theory ( trafficking, abduction, wandered ) and then the media select what they want to present and some parts not at all.

    With the stranger abduction theory we still have the vast problem of that fitting into the timeline given. Just because there are places a child could have been hidden doesn't mean it's likely someone got into 5a, picked up a child and got out between parents coming up and down the road, and then hid the child without anyone noticing at all, no crying Madeleine, no crying twins - all in the short time available. 
 

You want once again to ignore the evidence of the experts who visited Luz......they were quite clear an abduction was possible...SY have said based on teh evidence they believe an abduction was possible...The PJ have said abduction is possible...

[Brietta]

'Why not' is not really the right question I feel, it is about being in the realms of possibility. Theories where a child just happened to wander out down dark steps and a predator was prowling around on the off chance, in between parents walking up and down and said off chance predator manages to hide the child without a trace is getting more and more complex and less probable IMO.

   If this is Off topic I apologise, I would be glad to get back to Sadie's theory but it hasn't really been explained here on this thread. I believe it is based around a planned stranger abduction?

Sadie's theory is not set in tablets of stone, it is added to and subtracted from during discussion.  Somewhere on this thread I have posted three separate links on the forum to some aspects ... but I am sure there may be more.
Yes, Sadie does subscribe to a 'planned stranger abduction.'

[jassi]

'Why not' is not really the right question I feel, it is about being in the realms of possibility. Theories where a child just happened to wander out down dark steps and a predator was prowling around on the off chance, in between parents walking up and down and said off chance predator manages to hide the child without a trace is getting more and more complex and less probable IMO.

   If this is Off topic I apologise, I would be glad to get back to Sadie's theory but it hasn't really been explained here on this thread. I believe it is based around a planned stranger abduction?

Indeed.  Also, not just any stranger abduction but a religious nutter stranger abduction.

[jassi]

We got some religious nutters on here to be offended?

[Robittybob1]

We got some religious nutters on here to be offended?

Maybe, who knows.

[Erngath]

We got some religious nutters on here to be offended?

I've openly stated my faith.
Not an easy thing to do nowadays.
But "religious nutter"?
I do hope not.