Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 2703651 times)

0 Members and 90 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1920 on: March 28, 2017, 10:05:28 PM »
A T-Shirt, underwear or a pair of comfy shoes? Yes - I'd take all those on holiday.

Well that is you, strange to say the least.

you would take work clothes,as you posted below. Well hopefully you will have washed them first.

stand in decomposing flesh or bodily fluids on an OR floor?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1921 on: March 29, 2017, 12:32:02 AM »
It is interesting to note that one of the previous occupants of 5a was a Surgical Assistant.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JUNE-HUGHES.htm

Work shoes & trouser bottoms can become contaminated in a hospital theatre.
Did you notice the translation error in that statement "As far as I recall, the living woman sofa"  rather than "As far as I recall, the living room sofa" http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JUNE-HUGHES.htm
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline misty

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1922 on: March 29, 2017, 12:53:52 AM »
Did you notice the translation error in that statement "As far as I recall, the living woman sofa"  rather than "As far as I recall, the living room sofa" http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JUNE-HUGHES.htm

Ha, no I didn't. I was more interested in her occupation & the date the statement was taken than the accuracy of the translation. Having browsed through some old threads in search of a particular photo (which I still couldn't find),  the matter of how the McCann clothes on the wardrobe shelf could have been contaminated made me think about it again. It's quite clear from the statement date that Amaral could not have given JH's occupation due consideration in a possible cross-contamination.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1923 on: March 29, 2017, 08:57:49 AM »
Ha, no I didn't. I was more interested in her occupation & the date the statement was taken than the accuracy of the translation. Having browsed through some old threads in search of a particular photo (which I still couldn't find),  the matter of how the McCann clothes on the wardrobe shelf could have been contaminated made me think about it again. It's quite clear from the statement date that Amaral could not have given JH's occupation due consideration in a possible cross-contamination.
Now I understand you.  You are thinking JH's clothes could have carried cadaver contamination on them.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1924 on: March 29, 2017, 08:58:24 AM »
Did you notice the translation error in that statement "As far as I recall, the living woman sofa"  rather than "As far as I recall, the living room sofa" http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JUNE-HUGHES.htm

"o sofa da sala" on the Portuguese statement. ENGLISH TRANSLATION BY INES so his/her mistake.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Brietta

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1925 on: March 29, 2017, 09:34:50 AM »
"o sofa da sala" on the Portuguese statement. ENGLISH TRANSLATION BY INES so his/her mistake.

Precisely so.

How many other mistakes are attributable to translators anxious to publish the files on the internet?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1926 on: March 29, 2017, 10:13:35 AM »
Who said it was a scrub outfit? Can you take a contaminated item of clothing off without transferring anything to what's being worn underneath? Is it possible to unwittingly stand in decomposing flesh or bodily fluids on an OR floor?

I think she was a surgical assistant not an undertakers assistant. What about the development interval we are always told about?
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1927 on: March 29, 2017, 10:17:29 AM »
I think she was a surgical assistant not an undertakers assistant. What about the development interval we are always told about?
If you remove bits of people on the operating table, the bits you remove effectively become bits of dead body.    Can we know for sure that this person or their personal effects were never exposed to materials that could have contaminated the apartment with cadaver scent?

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1928 on: March 29, 2017, 10:19:56 AM »
If you remove bits of people on the operating table, the bits you remove effectively become bits of dead body.    Can we know for sure that this person or their personal effects were never exposed to materials that could have contaminated the apartment with cadaver scent?

Are you suggesting those bits have been dead for a couple of hours?
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1929 on: March 29, 2017, 10:22:22 AM »
Are you suggesting those bits have been dead for a couple of hours?
I'm not suggesting anything - I asked a question.  Some operations last 8 hours.  Think about it.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1930 on: March 29, 2017, 10:28:19 AM »
I'm not suggesting anything - I asked a question.  Some operations last 8 hours.  Think about it.

Is this the Alfie OR as abattoir theory?
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1931 on: March 29, 2017, 10:43:04 AM »
Is this the Alfie OR as abattoir theory?
Is this post an attempt at goading?

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1932 on: March 29, 2017, 10:45:10 AM »
Is this the Alfie OR as abattoir theory?
Rather than taking the piss, perhaps you can explain why it would have been impossible for someone who is a surgical assistant to have contaminated the apartment with cadaver odour. 

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1933 on: March 29, 2017, 11:05:24 AM »
Rather than taking the piss, perhaps you can explain why it would have been impossible for someone who is a surgical assistant to have contaminated the apartment with cadaver odour.

So many possibilities have been dredged up to explain Eddie's alerts. Of course each one also suggests his alerts were not false. Instead the idea is that he alerted correctly, but it was to something other than a body in 5A on 3rd May 2007. Ten out of ten for effort, but most of the suggestions are pretty unbelievable.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #1934 on: March 29, 2017, 11:16:57 AM »
So many possibilities have been dredged up to explain Eddie's alerts. Of course each one also suggests his alerts were not false. Instead the idea is that he alerted correctly, but it was to something other than a body in 5A on 3rd May 2007. Ten out of ten for effort, but most of the suggestions are pretty unbelievable.
Yes it's pretty unbelievable that Madeleine McCann lay dead in the apartment for 2 hours prior to 10pm because that means her parents went out to dinner and for a merry time in the full knowledge that their child was dead and allowed their friends to go check on their kids whilst they were at dinner, yet you seem to think this is plausible.