Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 2440403 times)

0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2595 on: December 10, 2017, 09:40:25 AM »
yet it has been claimed here that the four burglars have been ruled out..is Murat ruled out

I think you will find Rowley confirmed the four burglars were ruled out,not a claim from any one on here.The simple fact is no one is officially under the spotlight,that includes the McCanns and if you like Murat,why bring him into it?
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2596 on: December 10, 2017, 09:41:41 AM »
I think you will find Rowley confirmed the four burglars were ruled out,not a claim from any one on here.The simple fact is no one is officially under the spotlight,that includes the McCanns and if you like Murat,why bring him into it?

As i have said the fact the police have said that they are not suspects must support their claim to innocence..imo
« Last Edit: December 10, 2017, 12:30:56 PM by Angelo222 »

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2597 on: December 10, 2017, 09:43:01 AM »
Just because you cannot find something does not mean it does not exist...IMO

As in evidence of accidental death ?

« Last Edit: December 10, 2017, 09:45:06 AM by slartibartfast »

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2598 on: December 10, 2017, 09:43:38 AM »
So you are saying the Mccanns are free from suspicion..fair enough

My opinions count for nothing along with any one else on here,Rowley does not confide in me,but we know from his last statement no one but no one is under suspicion.He said they had leads to follow not people.The debacle of the woman in purple amply demonstrates that.imo and all that jazz.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2599 on: December 10, 2017, 09:44:41 AM »
As in evidence of accidental death ?

So you agree an abductor could exist?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2600 on: December 10, 2017, 09:46:06 AM »
My opinions count for nothing along with any one else on here,Rowley does not confide in me,but we know from his last statement no one but no one is under suspicion.He said they had leads to follow not people.The debacle of the woman in purple amply demonstrates that.imo and all that jazz.
Rowley does not confide so we dont know who is under suspicion...
« Last Edit: December 10, 2017, 12:42:10 PM by Angelo222 »

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2601 on: December 10, 2017, 09:46:38 AM »
As i have said the fact the police have said that they are not suspects must support their claim to innocence..imo

If that were to suddenly turn over night? there is only one way of knowing if any one is innocent or some way guilty,that is to have been party to what went on that night.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2017, 12:34:35 PM by Angelo222 »
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2602 on: December 10, 2017, 09:48:15 AM »
So you agree an abductor could exist?

Do you agree Madeleine may have an accident in the apartment and died ?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2603 on: December 10, 2017, 09:48:36 AM »
If that were to suddenly turn over night? there is only one way of knowing if any one is innocent or some way guilty,that is to have been party to what went on that night.

But IMO we know at the moment that the mccanns are not suspects
« Last Edit: December 10, 2017, 12:40:39 PM by Angelo222 »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2604 on: December 10, 2017, 09:49:37 AM »
Do you agree Madeleine may have an accident in the apartment and died ?
No I dont think that is possible for many many reasons and it seems both police forces are not considering this possibility

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2605 on: December 10, 2017, 09:50:07 AM »
Rowley does not confide so we dont know who is under suspicion...

To be precise Redwood said that,Rowley has never utterd any thing about them save to say he was happy with which the much maligned investigation at the outset dealt admirably with them.That was under the Stewardship of Mr Amaral was it not.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2017, 12:42:48 PM by Angelo222 »
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2606 on: December 10, 2017, 09:50:37 AM »
Please be careful of not posting opinion as fact. Repeated infringement will be sanctioned.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2607 on: December 10, 2017, 09:52:18 AM »
No I dont think that is possible for many many reasons and it seems both police forces are not considering this possibility

I think it would be fairer to say,both police forces don't seem to have considered this so far,we don't know where they are at now.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2608 on: December 10, 2017, 09:53:35 AM »
we have been told the mccanns are not suspects and it is clear they are not being investigated..

You never know,that statement may well represent why the case remains unsolved.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2609 on: December 10, 2017, 09:53:53 AM »
No I dont think that is possible for many many reasons and it seems both police forces are not considering this possibility




Yet they can't find an abductor, and you can't find what doesn't exist.

A.I.M.H.O. naturally.