Wandering Off Topic

[jassi]

Why am I not at all surprised by that response, but how sad that you should feel the need to express it.

Even sadder that you chose to write it in the first place then.

[slartibartfast]

Why am I not at all surprised by that response, but how sad that you should feel the need to express it.

Because it is common sense.

[Alice Purjorick]

Don't you think it is pushing credulity for those parents to find a man in their six year old daughter's bed?
Equally incredible that he effected entry to a locked house entirely unheard and unseen and who, if he had so desired could have lifted the child and left the premises with her as unheard and unseen as he had entered?

How is it possible for you to defend such an indefensible situation?

Oh amazingly easily.
About as easily as you find it to display faux outrage and misrepresent the posts of others seemingly.....

[Vertigo Swirl]

Because it is common sense.

What are you referring to?

[sadie]

Completely different imo

Imagine what would have happened if the girl had been left alone while her parents were at the pub 50 yards away.

They were still on Ocean Club premises kizzy ... and the tapas group could see the only entrance (patio door) that The Mccanns, at the time, knew to be unlocked although closed.  The patio area outside this patio door was illuminated by the street lamp opposite.

When Amaral postulated that no intruder could have got in to 5A and trying to prove it, he said that no intruder would have risked entering when so overlooked by the parents at only 50 metres distance.


You seem to hang on Amarals every word.  Why are you ignoring Amarals opinion on this ?

[sadie]

Bit surprised he was able to break in without waking the whole street.
Maybe the property wasn't as secure as was claimed.

Strange story all round.

We have been broken into three times without hearing the burglars entrance.  However we were wakened by a wimpering, trembling dog the once ... and the noise of movement within the house both the other times.


Now the good news.  Our new local neighbourhood watch, which is using up to the minute electronic technology and keen vigilant neighbours just prevented a burglar getting away, partially by tracking him on video cameras and partially by blocking off all the escape routes by man power.

[Robittybob1]

"Ad hom" posts maybe removed

[Miss Taken Identity]

... and their parents were at a distance of less than 45 seconds away from them.

Mr Brunt that moronic !!!!     

He trashed that claim. even a young gazelle couldn't do it in that time! IF they were that close she could have waved and shouted for the tapas tram to come to her...

45 seconds eh   

[Miss Taken Identity]

They were still on Ocean Club premises kizzy ... and the tapas group could see the only entrance (patio door) that The Mccanns, at the time, knew to be unlocked although closed.  The patio area outside this patio door was illuminated by the street lamp opposite.

When Amaral postulated that no intruder could have got in to 5A and trying to prove it, he said that no intruder would have risked entering when so overlooked by the parents at only 50 metres distance.


You seem to hang on Amarals every word.  Why are you ignoring Amarals opinion on this ?

Enbolden.... they could NOT see the comings and goings of anyone from that patio door due the bushes ..

[Lace]

They were still on Ocean Club premises kizzy ... and the tapas group could see the only entrance (patio door) that The Mccanns, at the time, knew to be unlocked although closed.  The patio area outside this patio door was illuminated by the street lamp opposite.

When Amaral postulated that no intruder could have got in to 5A and trying to prove it, he said that no intruder would have risked entering when so overlooked by the parents at only 50 metres distance.


You seem to hang on Amarals every word.  Why are you ignoring Amarals opinion on this ?

When Amaral postulated that no intruder could have got in to 5A and trying to prove it, he said that no intruder would have risked entering when so overlooked by the parents at only 50 metres distance.

Amaral was adament that no intruder had got into 5a.    Had he heard about the man who was getting into apartments and getting into bed with children?    How did he think that man had got into those apartments?  The apartments were secured according to the parents.

[Miss Taken Identity]

When Amaral postulated that no intruder could have got in to 5A and trying to prove it, he said that no intruder would have risked entering when so overlooked by the parents at only 50 metres distance.

Amaral was adament that no intruder had got into 5a.    Had he heard about the man who was getting into apartments and getting into bed with children?    How did he think that man had got into those apartments?  The apartments were secured according to the parents.

Could it be it was the parents claims  he was quoting... irony? He knew it wasn't 45 seconds (Brietta got it down to 30/40 seconds in one of her posts) He knew the parents could not see who was entering the apartment from the Patio doors...

[Robittybob1]

Could it be it was the parents claims  he was quoting... irony? He knew it wasn't 45 seconds (Brietta got it down to 30/40 seconds in one of her posts) He knew the parents could not see who was entering the apartment from the Patio doors...

That is not the point GA was making.  It is from the perspective of an intruder.  Did an intruder know the Tapas 9 had trouble seeing the apartment?

[Admin]

Reminder to all members!

Forum Rules

You agree, through your use of this forum, that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, adult material, or otherwise in violation of any International or United States Federal law. You also agree not to post any copyrighted material unless you own the copyright or you have written consent from the owner of the copyrighted material. Spam, flooding, advertisements, chain letters, pyramid schemes, and solicitations are also forbidden on this forum.

Note that it is impossible for the staff or the owners of this forum to confirm the validity of posts. Please remember that we do not always actively monitor the posted messages, and as such, are not responsible for the content contained within. We do not warrant the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information presented. The posted messages express the views of the author, and not necessarily the views of this forum, its staff, its subsidiaries, or this forum's owner. Anyone who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to notify an administrator or moderator of this forum immediately. The staff and the owner of this forum reserve the right to remove objectionable content, within a reasonable time frame, if they determine that removal is necessary. This is a manual process, however, please realize that they may not be able to remove or edit particular messages immediately. This policy applies to member profile information as well.

You remain solely responsible for the content of your posted messages. Furthermore, you agree to indemnify and hold harmless the owners of this forum, any related websites to this forum, its staff, and its subsidiaries. The owners of this forum also reserve the right to reveal your identity (or any other related information collected on this service) in the event of a formal complaint or legal action arising from any situation caused by your use of this forum.

You have the ability, as you register, to choose your username. We advise that you keep the name appropriate. With this user account you are about to register, you agree to never give your password out to another person except an administrator, for your protection and for validity reasons. You also agree to NEVER use another person's account for any reason.  We also HIGHLY recommend you use a complex and unique password for your account, to prevent account theft.

After you register and login to this forum, you will be able to fill out a detailed profile. It is your responsibility to present clear and accurate information. Any information the forum owner or staff determines to be inaccurate or vulgar in nature will be removed, with or without prior notice. Appropriate sanctions may be applicable.

Please note that with each post, your IP address is recorded, in the event that you need to be banned from this forum or your ISP contacted. This will only happen in the event of a major violation of this agreement.

Also note that the software places a cookie, a text file containing bits of information (such as your username and password), in your browser's cache. This is ONLY used to keep you logged in/out. The software does not collect or send any other form of information to your computer.

Please treat all members with respect and accept gracefully that other users may not necessarily share your point of view.  Debates should be structured and constructive, they should not be used as a mechanism to disrupt or goad or provoke other users.  In the event that a breach of these rules occurs, moderators can invoke sanctions which can include pre authorisation of posts and a temporary ban.

These rules will be amended periodically as the need arises.

ADMIN

[Brietta]

Could it be it was the parents claims  he was quoting... irony? He knew it wasn't 45 seconds (Brietta got it down to 30/40 seconds in one of her posts) He knew the parents could not see who was entering the apartment from the Patio doors...

You don't think the PJ thought to walk the distance from the Tapas to the apartment then?

It was one of the first things that came into Martin Brunt's head to check out and we've all watched him do it ~ something like seventy four steps or thereabouts if I recall correctly.

Why wouldn't the trained investigators of the PJ do what had occurred to a journalist to do in walking the distance and maybe even timing how long it took them to do it as well, do you think?

[Miss Taken Identity]

You don't think the PJ thought to walk the distance from the Tapas to the apartment then?

It was one of the first things that came into Martin Brunt's head to check out and we've all watched him do it ~ something like seventy four steps or thereabouts if I recall correctly.

Why wouldn't the trained investigators of the PJ do what had occurred to a journalist to do in walking the distance and maybe even timing how long it took them to do it as well, do you think?

I cn only assume they did, once they stopped laughing at the 30/40 seconds away, story, and the mother running out to go get the Tapas group leaving babies alone again after one had already been abducted.

 I mean come on...

"Why wouldn't the trained investigators of the PJ do what had occurred to a journalist to do in walking the distance and maybe even timing" 

Well , them trained investigators probably wouldn't because they could not see  people sitting at the Tapas from the balcony, they also didn't believe they were'like sitting in a garden' So the steps and times would not have been relevant within the first few hours...too busy munching them samiches, watching Kate n Gerry searching all alone.