Wandering Off Topic

[Wonderfulspam]

No I don?t find it remotely suspicious and I know that anyone with an ounce of sense (especially anyone who is a parent) would agree with me.  His daughter was not in the apartment and had to be somewhere, there was a possibility that she was in the vicinity, having been removed by an intruder.  Of course he would search, just as dozens of others searched.

That's because you are an idiot.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You had to ask me again & again today exactly what Matt said. Yet you've read the files repeatedly. You are retarded.

I asked you again and again because I knew Matt never gave a time the alarm was raised.  I rarely ask trolls like you a question I don?t already know the answer to.

[Vertigo Swirl]

That's because you are an idiot.

Haha, you?re soooo rattled.  Bless you Spam, you really should calm down and go and dead head the petunias and pet the cat, they must all be feeling rather neglected today.

[Wonderfulspam]

We've established today you're a total idiot VS. You trust the police more than evidence itself. Believe the archiving summary is evidence & believe all of Kate & Gerry's lies. There really is no hope for you.

[Wonderfulspam]

Haha, you?re soooo rattled.  Bless you Spam, you really should calm down and go and dead head the petunias and pet the cat, they must all be feeling rather neglected today.

I'm not rattled. It's just that you are incredibly stupid & gullible.

[Wonderfulspam]

I asked you again and again because I knew Matt never gave a time the alarm was raised.  I rarely ask trolls like you a question I don?t already know the answer to.

Now I know you're a liar too.

[Vertigo Swirl]

So what? Your conclusion therefore is everything Kate claimed in the book must be entirely accurate without question? I'd say that doesn't really follow. None of the T9 have ever really spoken to the media about anything really.

Because they have nothing else to say, no dirt to dish, no evidence the McCanns dunnot, nothing.  Same goes for all the other British witnesses that night most of whom almost certainly will have read the book. 

[Wonderfulspam]

Because they have nothing else to say, no dirt to dish, no evidence the McCanns dunnot, nothing.  Same goes for all the other British witnesses that night most of whom almost certainly will have read the book.

That doesn't mean the McCanns are innocent. It just means they got away with it. Luckily for Gerry, he was only seen by one family. But they did definitely see him. I know this for a fact, because the McCanns did it.

[Wonderfulspam]

We never did get to listing all the amazing evidence of abduction today did we.
That's because all there is, is a sighting of Gerry.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Now I know you're a liar too.

I?m not a liar but I could be mistaken.  So now,once and for all, post the bit in Matt?s statement where he says what time the alarm was raised.  I?m willing to eat humble pie but I need to see it with my own eyes to believe it first.
Whilst we?re waiting for you to do that may I also ask why Matt?s statement seems to have risen to the top of the pile as the most likely to be accurate in terms of the timeline and why we must disbelieve his 4th May statement when he says Kate left the table at 10pm?

[Vertigo Swirl]

That doesn't mean the McCanns are innocent. It just means they got away with it. Luckily for Gerry, he was only seen by one family. But they did definitely see him. I know this for a fact, because the McCanns did it.

Ridiculous.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Well, it?s been a lovely day and night being shat on by a deranged strutting pigeon but it?s time for this old, moronic, stupid, gullible retarded woman to take herself off to bed. There won?t be a repeat performance tomorrow as I?m working all day and then travelling down South to spend time with my even older and more deranged parents (neither of them think the McCanns dunnit either). 

[Wonderfulspam]

I?m not a liar but I could be mistaken.  So now,once and for all, post the bit in Matt?s statement where he says what time the alarm was raised.  I?m willing to eat humble pie but I need to see it with my own eyes to believe it first.
Whilst we?re waiting for you to do that may I also ask why Matt?s statement seems to have risen to the top of the pile as the most likely to be accurate in terms of the timeline and why we must disbelieve his 4th May statement when he says Kate left the table at 10pm?

Matt's timing tallies with Russell's half eaten steak. But you already know this because you have read the files dozens of times. Neither Matt, nor Russell's evidence tally at all with Gerry's 10:13pm claim. But we must accept as gospel Gerry's claim, because if he lied, then he might have lied about other things.
Gerry felt that Kate was in the apartment for around 10 minutes, he became concerned by her lateness, between 10:03pm precisely (somehow without looking at his watch) & 10:13pm.

[Wonderfulspam]

Gerry was very specific that he sent Kate at precisely 10:03pm, without looking at his watch, & that she took around 10 minutes. He was concerned she took so long. That does not tally with the rest of the group.
Was Gerry just mistaken then? No, 10:03pm was an important time for him because he looked at his watch just after passing the Smiths.

[Wonderfulspam]

I'd like to politely suggest to forum members. If you're not keen on being insulted by me, the solution to this is to not be stupid enough to believe the McCanns. That would solve it.