Vincent Tabak and the Murder of Joanna Yeates

[[...]]

Yet again Nine you are manipulating things to fit your opinions and warped mind that he is innocent , yet again failing to see he admitted the crime so making so many of your points invalid and not necessary but how you can possibly say that the 145 sick and deprived images he had of children are insignificant is absolutely disgusting and I can only presume you yourself get off on such images yourself or that you have no moral concept of what is right or wrong .

You keep pointing out what VT said , thought or intended to do unless you are him how do you know his thoughts , morals, intentions or acts you are not him so can't possibly know his thoughts and you weren't there so don't know how things happened you are making things up to fit your train of thoughts which if you believe those 145 images are innocent makes you as warped as VT and every other child sex offender in this country ....

You pre-empted my post Paul..... Do you play bridge????

And you can be as rude as you like....  I'm not warped...  I'm trying to understand why they brought these charges years later that is all....!!!!!!!

[jixy]

something about this situation isn't real and I KNOW that for sure! Maybe the truth should be out there. Yes that is a very good idea!

[jixy]

anyone found with indecent images of children should always be charged no matter what. there is no excuse and no time limit to it

Even when it encourages people to become quite obsessed with it and they can attach themselves to others who  have been through abuse . Ive seen that before.  People can pretend to be all kinds but with some there is no hiding

[[...]]

something about this situation isn't real and I KNOW that for sure! Maybe the truth should be out there. Yes that is a very good idea!

I agree the truth should be out there..... The truth that Dr Vincent Tabak didn't do it (IMO)

Question jixy do you have paint on your PC or any other program that will allow you to change a photgraph??

[[...]]

anyone found with indecent images of children should always be charged no matter what. there is no excuse and no time limit to it

Even when it encourages people to become quite obsessed with it and they can attach themselves to others who  have been through abuse . Ive seen that before.  People can pretend to be all kinds but with some there is no hiding

I can understand where you are coming from Jixy....  But it's impossible for that to happen...

What do they class as indecent images...

Would that be a picture of my son when he was 3.. standing naked after his bath twirling an umbrella clicking his tongue to say: chicken???

Or a picture of my daughter naked at the beach.. running through the waves when she was a toddler...

I don't know what could be perseived as indecent... if what i've said above.. then half the country should be charged, because I'm sure they have a "Paint" program to add to that evidence!!!!!!

So if that is possible... then they can pick and choose who they charge depending on the reason they feel they have.....

Like letting the world know Dr Vincent Tabak is a SEX obsessed Monster...!!!! which backs their original charge as they see it!!!

[[...]]

Well i feel worn down with all of this.....

[mrswah]

For goodness sake!!!

It was Vincent Tabak's lawyer, Dean Armstrong QC, who tried to get the child porn charges thrown out.  I suspect VT himself was well beyond arguing by this stage----but of course, I wasn't there, so I don't know.

I am not getting into an argument about abuse and indecent images of children, both of which are abhorrent.  My point is whether or not an independent witness vouched for the images allegedly on VT's computer. This should have happened, as far as I am aware. If it didn't, then who knows what was on his computer???

[PaultheRed]

GUESS THE TRUTH HURTS ....

if my post is offensive what about your post  supporting Nine and his  post claiming  it is okay to have 145 indecent images of innocent children that VT had and show his sexual prowess and they show what a perverted mind VT had , The Judge , jury & press all believe he was guilty of Murder , VT himself admitted manslaughter so is in his own words guilty , the opinions raised don't in any way show his innocent or a miscarriage of justice , guess if you manipulate the press reports enough like you both have  you could show  Jimmy Saville as innocent or even The Yorkshire Ripper 

[John]

Posters are reminded of the forum rules in relation to makiing personal remarks or attempts to identify anonymous contributors.  I have allowed this thread to run without much disturbance but if this goading or sniping continues it could be locked or removed completely.  Over to you...

[[...]]

I have posted a lot on this thread...

[[...]]

Well I must say... for a little thread tucked out of the way, I think it's quite amazing that we have had over 10,000 reads in over 3 months..

[mrswah]

I agree  that a lot about this case is very fishy indeed.

However, if Vincent Tabak does not say he is innocent, nobody can help him----------unless, one day, somebody pipes up and says they know something.  Such things happen.

I am amazed that so few people have  questioned this case, to be honest.

I am also amazed that VT told such a rubbish story in court, and it did not dawn on anybody that he might have done this because he had been told what to say.

It is, of course possible that he is guilty. It is also possible that he assisted somebody, and is covering for that person.

We will see.

[[...]]

I agree  that a lot about this case is very fishy indeed.

However, if Vincent Tabak does not say he is innocent, nobody can help him----------unless, one day, somebody pipes up and says they know something.  Such things happen.

Well lets hope that is the case!!!!!

[[...]]

                                                 UnFair Trial........

The following issues that lean toward an unfair trial and a mistrial are as follows:

So... below are a list that pertains to just that:......

[[...]]

"A trial judge always has an overriding duty in every case to ensure a fair trial, and if in any particular case he comes to the conclusion that, even though certain evidence is strictly admissible, yet its prejudicial effect once admitted is such as to make it virtually impossible for a dispassionate view of the cruicial facts of the case to be thereafter taken by the jury, then the trial judge, in my judgement, should exlude that evidence."