Author Topic: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?  (Read 54622 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #45 on: February 12, 2017, 11:30:29 AM »
People in Portugal to this day can still be convicted if they say something unpleasant about a lawyer or a judge, let alone The President, even if it is true.
While An ex PJ Officer can say what he likes about the hoi poloi.

Meanwhile,  a convicted torturer has his word taken as gospel.

Nonsense as usual.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Eleanor

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #46 on: February 12, 2017, 11:36:51 AM »
Nonsense as usual.

What have I said that isn't true?

Offline barrier

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #47 on: February 12, 2017, 11:43:23 AM »
People in Portugal to this day can still be convicted if they say something unpleasant about a lawyer or a judge, let alone The President, even if it is true.
While An ex PJ Officer can say what he likes about the hoi poloi.

Meanwhile,  a convicted torturer has his word taken as gospel.

Hoi polloi! they're Doctors don't you know,what,what.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline barrier

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #48 on: February 12, 2017, 11:44:50 AM »
People in Portugal to this day can still be convicted if they say something unpleasant about a lawyer or a judge, let alone The President, even if it is true.
While An ex PJ Officer can say what he likes about the hoi poloi.

Meanwhile,  a convicted torturer has his word taken as gospel.

Are you suggesting a conviction was for torture? cite?
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #49 on: February 12, 2017, 11:52:43 AM »
Are you suggesting a conviction was for torture? cite?

Not Amaral. no.

Offline barrier

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #50 on: February 12, 2017, 12:37:06 PM »
Not Amaral. no.

To whom is this in reference to then?

People in Portugal to this day can still be convicted if they say something unpleasant about a lawyer or a judge, let alone The President, even if it is true.
While An ex PJ Officer can say what he likes about the hoi poloi.

Meanwhile,  a convicted torturer has his word taken as gospel.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Angelo222

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #51 on: February 12, 2017, 12:43:30 PM »
To whom is this in reference to then?

PJ officer Tavares de Almeida was convicted of torture.
www.miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2140.msg71031#msg71031

A report by Chief Inspector Tavares de Almeida to the Coordinator of the Criminal Investigation where he concludes, after analyzing all the evidence gathered, that the child is dead and the parents were responsible for cadaver occultation, and the entire GROUP was lying since the first day of the investigation.

www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TAVARES_ALMEIDA.htm
« Last Edit: February 12, 2017, 12:48:47 PM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #52 on: February 12, 2017, 12:50:02 PM »
Judgement Page 67:

"Of all those circumstances does not result, in our view, that underlying the book, the documentary and interview, exists an defamatory intention against the appellants, i.e an animus injuriandi, but rather an animus informandi and an animus defendendi. The opinion expressed by the respondent is sufficiently detailed in an intelligible and logical assessment of the facts and elements of evidence gathered in the investigation"

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #53 on: February 12, 2017, 01:03:02 PM »
Don't worry about everyone else do you believe Gerry saw Madeleine at 9:05 PM?

Apparently she was asleep on top of the covers but the covers were folded back 8)--))

"Madeleine was lying down on her left side, she was completely uncovered, that is, lying on top of the covers."
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-ARGUIDO.htm

Meanwhile the other says:
"She was under the covers, she thinks because she was a bit cold."
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/KATE-MCCANN_ARGUIDO.htm

"With respect to the bed where his daughter was on the night she disappeared he says that she slept uncovered, as usual when she was hot, with the bedclothes folded down."
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-10MAY.htm

Just one more thing.............
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline barrier

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #54 on: February 12, 2017, 01:04:16 PM »
PJ officer Tavares de Almeida was convicted of torture.
www.miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2140.msg71031#msg71031

A report by Chief Inspector Tavares de Almeida to the Coordinator of the Criminal Investigation where he concludes, after analyzing all the evidence gathered, that the child is dead and the parents were responsible for cadaver occultation, and the entire GROUP was lying since the first day of the investigation.

www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TAVARES_ALMEIDA.htm
Thanks.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Angelo222

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #55 on: February 12, 2017, 01:09:35 PM »
Apparently she was asleep on top of the covers but the covers were folded back 8)--))

"Madeleine was lying down on her left side, she was completely uncovered, that is, lying on top of the covers."
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-ARGUIDO.htm

Meanwhile the other says:
"She was under the covers, she thinks because she was a bit cold."
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/KATE-MCCANN_ARGUIDO.htm

"With respect to the bed where his daughter was on the night she disappeared he says that she slept uncovered, as usual when she was hot, with the bedclothes folded down."
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-10MAY.htm

Just one more thing.............

All that means is that she was put to bed under the covers but ended up on top of them later.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #56 on: February 12, 2017, 01:17:33 PM »
All that means is that she was put to bed under the covers but ended up on top of them later.

Perhaps not, from recollection, as the bed covers were virtually undisturbed.

They looked from the photos, gently folded over.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #57 on: February 12, 2017, 01:20:59 PM »
All that means is that she was put to bed under the covers but ended up on top of them later.

So she started off under the covers but with them still folded down?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #58 on: February 12, 2017, 01:29:56 PM »
Don't worry about everyone else do you believe Gerry saw Madeleine at 9:05 PM?

Believe is the operaive word here.
Convinced would be better used. Not many people are convinced by Gerry's statement. I find it to be wholly wreckless that a father who had agreed to leave the children alone every night before they left the UK, to adapt a 'listening' service would suddenly offer an account of the last time he saw His daughter alive, was that night he claims she disappeared. Seriously? door ajar?

I don't think we managed to asertain who was the last person to put the children to bed and leave the door 'ajar'. Kate thinks it was her, Gerry wouldn't know how ajar the door was unless they took to measuring before and after Maddies alleged disappearance from the room.

Also. Gerry 'thought' someone may have been hiding behind the door , but he didn't check, he left the children alone anyway.
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Were the McCanns innocent in the eyes of the law?
« Reply #59 on: February 12, 2017, 01:35:57 PM »
So she started off under the covers but with them still folded down?

Exactly G!  The bed looked like it was ready for someone to be put to bed. I used to do this for my children when they were younger, after their bathtime, still do for visitors!
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin