Kate and Gerry have both publicly contested the cadaver alerts?

[ShiningInLuz]

Can you list any (I'm not asking for cites just things off the top of your head)?

It would require that Matthew's offer to check in 5A was in some way predictable.  That in turn would imply that the stated checking regime for the week was not what was actually happening.

Otherwise known as a can of worms.

Hence my eeeeeeek!

As I expect this part of the thread to hit the bin before morning rises in the UK, I won't be expending any more energy on it tonight.

[pathfinder73]

The question has been all along would Kate and Gerry allow Matt to do a check if they knew Madeleine was deceased in the apartment?  It is a very difficult question to answer actually.  It seems beyond normal human behaviour.

I don't believe she was inside the apartment when Matt checked. The contradiction on which door was used clearly stands out.

[misty]

Well I salute you Misty for having the courage to say what your theory is in part.  I'd really like you to start a thread and blast us with your theory, for you have done a lot of research.  Have you ever done that before?  Have you ever presented your theory in full?  A theory is not libel for its only a theory.

Can't do that, Rob as data is incomplete & I would risk libelling people.

[Robittybob1]

It would require that Matthew's offer to check in 5A was in some way predictable.  That in turn would imply that the stated checking regime for the week was not what was actually happening.

Otherwise known as a can of worms.

Hence my eeeeeeek!

As I expect this part of the thread to hit the bin before morning rises in the UK, I won't be expending any more energy on it tonight.

I don't see why it should.  I have found the exploration of other people's theories educational and it helps us understand where other members are coming from.  In the end someone may put up an issue which is like a "fatal error" to Misty's theory and she can move on to some other line of inquiry.

[Robittybob1]

Can't do that, Rob as data is incomplete & I would risk libelling people.

So do you keep looking for that data?  I have found if you set up a thread with the intention of looking for that data sometimes you will get it.

[Robittybob1]

Can't do that, Rob as data is incomplete & I would risk libelling people.

Could you do it in the hidden part as PF did?

[misty]

Could you do it in the hidden part as PF did?

No, because that area is not secure from the enemy within.

[Mr Gray]

Being new I will give you the benefit of the doubt but Grime explained all this.  Eddie showed an immediate interest in 5a but did not display the same eagerness in any of the other apartments.  Thus why a full examination took place at 5a whereas only a cursory examination took place in the other apartments.

What isn't in doubt is that a cadaver dog alerted to objects in 5a.

This is, the same Martin grime who said Eddie alerted to cuddle cat... Which I find ridiculous

[slartibartfast]

No, because that area is not secure from the enemy within.

Think I will save that one.

[Robittybob1]

No, because that area is not secure from the enemy within.

Its not that bad here is it?

[jassi]

No, because that area is not secure from the enemy within.

Interesting that you see people as 'the enemy' Almost as if it's something personal.

[Brietta]

Think I will save that one.

Check it out with SIL who likewise does not post sensitive information there ... and ask what his reason is for not doing so.

[slartibartfast]

Check it out with SIL who likewise does not post sensitive information there ... and ask what his reason is for not doing so.

I understand the reasons thank you.

[Brietta]

I understand the reasons thank you.

Then why scorn a member's post for expressing the reasons you purport to understand and for which there is precedence ~ of which we all appear to be aware?

[slartibartfast]

Then why scorn a member's post for expressing the reasons you purport to understand and for which there is precedence ~ of which we all appear to be aware?

Please cite scorn?