Is It Possible For A Non Professional Investigator To Solve The Case?

[Holly Goodhead]

Unfortunately for Holly, my opinion hasn't changed, even though I've given her theory serious thought and consideration.  The problem we have is in revealing names and implicating people (who imo are completely innocent) on an open public forum, when most here are itching to know who she suspects and why she is so insistent on them being responsible for MBM's disappearance.

I've no idea what your case related views are? 

[Holly Goodhead]

I know because you only have access to what is in the public domain and there is precious little evidence. You are making a totally unsubstantiated claim...its quite a reasonable stance to disbeleive in the circumstances. I presume Myster is just being polite having had 4 days to read it...lets see what he says. Im 100% convinced you are wrong to claim to have solved the case ....I repeat ...what you have is a theory.  We will see who is corrct shortly...hopefully

4 days?  I doubt Myster lives and breathes the case!  I've no idea what his views are on the info I sent as he has yet to provide feedback.  And even though he disagrees it doesn't mean he's right and I'm wrong.  Remember Myster and I have opposing views on Bamber who has some heavyweights behind him: QC's practicing and non-practicing and a former Tory mp to name but a few. 

[Holly Goodhead]

Myster has kindly forwarded an email setting out his reasons why he disagrees but guess what I disagree 

[Holly Goodhead]

Her suspect is a petite female holidaymaker.  That’s enough to know that the theory is pretty pants IMO.

So it has to be male, spotty and ugly then?

[Holly Goodhead]

as you say its  a theory...and you obviously dont agree with her theory. Im not really itching to know who here suspects are because its obvious her suspicions are not based on facts

So Myster doesn't agree a bit like saying G-Unit doesn't agree with you!

[Vertigo Swirl]

So it has to be male, spotty and ugly then?

Judging by the dozens of other examples of stranger abductions, particularly in cases where children have been taken from their homes, it would seem male is almost certainly a prerequisite, yes.

[G-Unit]

'Horrified' that's a bit strong isn't it especially given the Carl Beech fiasco?

Yes, horrified. Especially if the Met are as suggestible as the Carl Beech fiaso suggests. They could be digging into the life of a perfectly innocent person as we speak.

[Brietta]

Yes, horrified. Especially if the Met are as suggestible as the Carl Beech fiaso suggests. They could be digging into the life of a perfectly innocent person as we speak.

When they did 'dig into the lives' of the prominent names suggested to them by Carl Beech aka Nick they discovered there were no cases to be answered.

Is it your suggestion they should have ignored the accusations being made by a member of the public without carrying through on due process?
Particularly when Carl Beech and others had been encouraged by receipt of a huge payout from the Savile estate with very little effort apart from perhaps giving a dog a bad name which seems to work fine in kangaroo courts.

I await with bated breath your opening post in the new "Savile is innocent ... OK!!!!!" thread which your post suggests you must be beavering away at even as we speak.
We are the UK Justice Forum when all is said and done, are we not?

[G-Unit]

When they did 'dig into the lives' of the prominent names suggested to them by Carl Beech aka Nick they discovered there were no cases to be answered.

Is it your suggestion they should have ignored the accusations being made by a member of the public without carrying through on due process?
Particularly when Carl Beech and others had been encouraged by receipt of a huge payout from the Savile estate with very little effort apart from perhaps giving a dog a bad name which seems to work fine in kangaroo courts.

I await with bated breath your opening post in the new "Savile is innocent ... OK!!!!!" thread which your post suggests you must be beavering away at even as we speak.
We are the UK Justice Forum when all is said and done, are we not?

Are you suggesting that being a member of the UK Justice Forum gives people carte blanche to accuse others of committing a crime?

[Mr Gray]

Yes, horrified. Especially if the Met are as suggestible as the Carl Beech fiaso suggests. They could be digging into the life of a perfectly innocent person as we speak.

The advice from the College of Policing to all police forces post the Beech enquiry is that all complainants of abuse should be treated, as victims and believed subject to an investigation . I think it's quite important that the police should continue to do this

[Mr Gray]

Are you suggesting that being a member of the UK Justice Forum gives people carte blanche to accuse others of committing a crime?

It seems to be the case regarding the McCanns

[Holly Goodhead]

Judging by the dozens of other examples of stranger abductions, particularly in cases where children have been taken from their homes, it would seem male is almost certainly a prerequisite, yes.

But not always so best to keep an open mind. 

[The General]

It seems to be the case regarding the McCanns

Where specifically?

[barrier]

The advice from the College of Policing to all police forces post the Beech enquiry is that all complainants of abuse should be treated, as victims and believed subject to an investigation . I think it's quite important that the police should continue to do this

Quite right too,but it seems as if the "nick" review should have concluded long before it did it,with what was known to be rubbish.

[Holly Goodhead]

Yes, horrified. Especially if the Met are as suggestible as the Carl Beech fiaso suggests. They could be digging into the life of a perfectly innocent person as we speak.

They could also be digging into the lives of MM's abductors too!