Feedback for any improvements of the Madeleine McCann board.

[Mr Gray]

Have a go at what? Adding to John's workload?

from waht I can see is  a major part of johns workload is posters complaining...obviously sometimes with justification....about unfair moderation

[Eleanor]

from waht I can see is  a major part of johns workload is posters complaining...obviously sometimes with justification....about unfair moderation

You got that right.

I haven't been around for several weeks.  I wonder how many people complained about me while I wasn't here.

I've been back for just a few days.  One Deleted Comment and I am the Biased Devil Incarnate.

[The General]

You got that right.

I haven't been around for several weeks.  I wonder how many people complained about me while I wasn't here.

I've been back for just a few days.  One Deleted Comment and I am the Biased Devil Incarnate.

If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?

[Brietta]

Ditto.
I've already stated previously that I think the moderation favours 'supporters', so some equity would be useful. But because you won't see a problem, unsurprisingly, you won't bother doing anything about it - so why should I bother?
Besides, it was a rhetorical question, wasn't it? You don't actually want my opinion. It was a barb - a veiled goad. You don't even know you're doing it.

You are a member of this forum who seems to have an opinion about what you deem to be wrong with it.  I have presented you with the opportunity ~ as per the thread title ~ to suggest how things can be improved as unlike you I do not presume to know the inner workings of another member's brain.

Up to you how you respond but I must say ... so far I'm less than impressed.

[Brietta]

Ditto.
I've already stated previously that I think the moderation favours 'supporters', so some equity would be useful. But because you won't see a problem, unsurprisingly, you won't bother doing anything about it - so why should I bother?
Besides, it was a rhetorical question, wasn't it? You don't actually want my opinion. It was a barb - a veiled goad. You don't even know you're doing it.

I think one thing which would improve the quality of posting on this and any other board would be for members to read previous posts and to take them on board.

With reference to http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11040.msg559136#msg559136 which clearly states ... "Comments in relation to moderation should be posted on the appropriate board."

Please note ... you are not only posting off topic, you are deliberately posting entirely on the wrong thread despite a very reasonable request not to do so.

[The General]

I think one thing which would improve the quality of posting on this and any other board would be for members to read previous posts and to take them on board.

With reference to http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11040.msg559136#msg559136 which clearly states ... "Comments in relation to moderation should be posted on the appropriate board."

Please note ... you are not only posting off topic, you are deliberately posting entirely on the wrong thread despite a very reasonable request not to do so.

So which is it to be, prompting me to continue to respond 'off topic', as per your previous post, or stop responding 'off topic'?

[Brietta]

So which is it to be, prompting me to continue to respond 'off topic', as per your previous post, or stop responding 'off topic'?

Entirely up to you what you intend to say and do with your posts.  I would be perfectly content if on this thread you constructed your posts around ..."Feedback for any improvements of the Madeleine McCann board." ... then it isn't up to me what you choose to do.

[G-Unit]

If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?

Very profound and very true. There is no black and white, just many shades of grey.

[The General]

Entirely up to you what you intend to say and do with your posts.  I would be perfectly content if on this thread you constructed your posts around ..."Feedback for any improvements of the Madeleine McCann board." ... then it isn't up to me what you choose to do.

But you just told me to stay on topic IN THIS THREAD.
Read back, kimosabi, I was on topic until you gegged in.
The irony of you attempting to moderate my posts suggesting improvements to the board in a thread entitled 'Feedback for any improvements of the Madeleine McCann board' is stark.

[The General]

Very profound and very true. There is no black and white, just many shades of grey.

It's not mine, alas, I'm no Solzhenitsyn.

[Robittybob1]

Unfortunately i think your bias does cloud your judgement....Rob...imo...and its been noted by others...mounted a campaign of harassment against me...that fortunately has been stopped

I categorically deny that.

[Robittybob1]

Ok...for the sake of harmony Im open to that suggestion

Get abducted then.

[Miss Taken Identity]

There should be no issue with moderating when done properly it is good. Blatant bias and censorship from mods with an agenda is bad.

The very idea we have banned words in an adult forum is pathetic and it only adds to the snowflake  loud,noisy hysteria,. Being offended  on someones behalf is hilarious. I hope they get offended more often. Just to they can take part in any discussion.

Name calling- Kate loves a good snipe.

Fking W@nkers, tweedle dee -tweedle dum 'her plummy voice' (PF). to the very people who only wanted to help find her daughter. shameful.

[Vertigo Swirl]

There should be no issue with moderating when done properly it is good. Blatant bias and censorship from mods with an agenda is bad.

The very idea we have banned words in an adult forum is pathetic and it only adds to the snowflake  loud,noisy hysteria,. Being offended  on someones behalf is hilarious. I hope they get offended more often. Just to they can take part in any discussion.

Name calling- Kate loves a good snipe.

Fking W@nkers, tweedle dee -tweedle dum 'her plummy voice' (PF). to the very people who only wanted to help find her daughter. shameful.

You’re wasted on this forum.  Again. 

[Mr Gray]

Good to see the forum running with practically no moderation