Is there any evidence which implicates Sheila?

[Holly Goodhead]

But that is not what I have asked for is it?  I have asked you to list all the evidence that specifically points to Sheila as the culprit.  Is there any?

Rather unusually in this the case it was agreed at trial that the perp was one of two: JB or SC.  I do not believe any evidence exists that proves beyond reasonable doubt JB is responsible.

[Vertigo Swirl]

There is no "hard" evidence that Sheila committed the murders, as far as I can see. She was suspected of having done so because :

She was found with a gun lying across her body.

She suffered from a serious mental illness, and there have been cases where people with similar illnesses have killed.

She had, in the past, mentioned suicide.

Of those killed at WHF, Sheila seemed the person most likely to have done it. Jeremy wasn't there, and the doors were locked from the inside.

All easily refuted with the Bamber supporters’ favourite argument “just because...”

[barrier]

Rather unusually in this the case it was agreed at trial that the perp was one of two: JB or SC.  I do not believe any evidence exists that proves beyond reasonable doubt JB is responsible.

Ten peers thought different and that is all that mattered,nothing since has been to show they were wrong,including the unsuccessful appeals.Saint Jude's is the go to.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Rather unusually in this the case it was agreed at trial that the perp was one of two: JB or SC.  I do not believe any evidence exists that proves beyond reasonable doubt JB is responsible.

Do you believe there is any evidence which proves beyond reasonable doubt that the other possible perpetrator did it? Or do you think the weight of evidence is far heavier that Sheila did it than Jeremy?  If so kindly present it.

[Holly Goodhead]

Ten peers thought different and that is all that mattered,nothing since has been to show they were wrong,including the unsuccessful appeals.Saint Jude's is the go to.

Ten peers thought different at trial yes but the whole world has moved on since then.

[barrier]

Te peers thought different at trial yes but the whole world has moved on since then.

Indeed it as,whats that evidence that cast's enough doubt to release him?

[Holly Goodhead]

Indeed it as,whats that evidence that cast's enough doubt to release him?

What evidence exists showing the blood flake, that we are told was found in the silencer and matched SC's blood groups, was there as a result of the drawback phenemenon ie blood depositing inside a silencer as the result of a contact gunshot wound? 

[barrier]

What evidence exists showing the blood flake, that we are told was found in the silencer and matched SC's blood groups, was there as a result of the drawback phenemenon ie blood depositing inside a silencer as the result of a contact gunshot wound?

You from another thread.

I am quoting from a doc produced by the three appeal court judges who make clear at point 497:

ii) Sheila Caffell's DNA may have been in the sound moderator but it was not possible to conclude one way or the other whether it was

http://www.homepage-link.to/justice/judgements/Bamber/index.html

From the very same appeal no 520

520. Our conclusion was that we should not therefore admit the evidence and we have had no regard to it in reaching our conclusion. It can, however, be said about it that if it had been called at trial, it may well have represented yet another formidable string to the prosecution's bow in a case where even without any regard to that evidence, it has to be said that the prosecution were able to put forward a very strong case pointing to guilt.



So once again what has appeared since then that cast's doubt?

[APRIL]

You from another thread.

From the very same appeal no 520

520. Our conclusion was that we should not therefore admit the evidence and we have had no regard to it in reaching our conclusion. It can, however, be said about it that if it had been called at trial, it may well have represented yet another formidable string to the prosecution's bow in a case where even without any regard to that evidence, it has to be said that the prosecution were able to put forward a very strong case pointing to guilt.


It may be that whenever supporters find a possible pointer to Sheila's guilt, there will follow a counter balance.


So once again what has appeared since then that cast's doubt?

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Do you have any evidence of this?  Sounds very fanciful to me!!

Truth is, most believe he's guilty, some believe he's innocent, and some don't know. 

Such a variety of opinions should make for a good discussion forum---------but only if we are tolerant of each other's views.

I’ve seen several on Twitter who support and fawn over him,  and have slipped up by suggesting he could be guilty and was forced to kill them by someone else!

You’d be surprised how many oddballs there are out there, living in cloud cuckoo land...

[APRIL]

You from another thread.

From the very same appeal no 520

520. Our conclusion was that we should not therefore admit the evidence and we have had no regard to it in reaching our conclusion. It can, however, be said about it that if it had been called at trial, it may well have represented yet another formidable string to the prosecution's bow in a case where even without any regard to that evidence, it has to be said that the prosecution were able to put forward a very strong case pointing to guilt.



So once again what has appeared since then that cast's doubt?

Ooops! It may be that whenever supporters find a possible pointer to Jeremy's innocence, there's a counter balance which repudiates it?

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Rather unusually in this the case it was agreed at trial that the perp was one of two: JB or SC.  I do not believe any evidence exists that proves beyond reasonable doubt JB is responsible.

You haven’t answered the original question, Holly

You just sidestep

Again: List all the EVIDENCE which points to Sheila’s guilt?

I’d have thought you’d be eager to do that considering what a staunch supporter of JB you are.

[mrswah]

All easily refuted with the Bamber supporters’ favourite argument “just because...”

Of course!

[Holly Goodhead]

You haven’t answered the original question, Holly

You just sidestep

Again: List all the EVIDENCE which points to Sheila’s guilt?

I’d have thought you’d be eager to do that considering what a staunch supporter of JB you are.

When I first joined forums to discuss the case I looked through back threads/posts.  I've started numerous threads and made thousands of posts over years there's nothing preventing you from retrieving these threads/posts to look at my arguments.

[Vertigo Swirl]

When I first joined forums to discuss the case I looked through back threads/posts.  I've started numerous threads and made thousands of posts over years there's nothing preventing you from retrieving these threads/posts to look at my arguments.

And there's nothing preventing you helpfully assembling a bullet-point recap of all the evidence that Sheila committed the crime, nothing that is apart from that there IS nothing.