Is there any evidence which implicates Sheila?

[Brietta]

If exhibits hadn't been destroyed against all protocols then its quite possible modern forensic techniques could conclude the case.  For example fingerprints on casings and SC's nightdress subjected to DNA analysis.

Blood stain analysis and a shooting reconstruction are all to play for and might assist.

Other tests will almost certainly undermine the prosecution case to the extent it will resuly in JB's conviction being quashed.

You are insistent on having a ‘shooting reconstruction’.  I am at a loss to understand how such a thing could possibly be accomplished.

I think it is nothing more than a red herring.

The witnesses are dead and only the shooter knows the sequence of the events he orchestrated and he has no intention of sharing.

[mrswah]

All those “some have said” people are the brainwashed campaigners desperate to spread LIES.

There was NO movement inside the house

Sheila was NOT bleeding when she was found

Sheila DID have liver mortis


But listen, the question is: What Evidence is there of Sheila’s Guilt?

The post has been up a long time, and not ONE person has produced any

I agree there is no hard evidence of Sheila's guilt-------or, I would rather put it, that Sheila killed her family and then committed suicide. I believe her illness absolves her of guilt, but that's just my own feeling about it.

In addition, I will not go along with everything that either "guilters" or "supporters" say.  I will continue to explore all the information out there.

[Brietta]

There's no evidence CC ever met with the pathologist Dr Vanezis.  I believe he did speak with SC's psychiatrist and discuss her medication but the appropriate person to determine toxicology was chemist Alexander Allan not SC's psychiatrist Dr Ferguson.

I don't believe anyone claimed at trial SC was over sedated etc.

Sheila wasn't on trial.  Jeremy Bamber was and he was convicted of murdering her, her six year old sons and her parents.

[Caroline]

I said almost certainly.  There are two tests that are black and white.  The outcomes will either show that what was tested is possible, which will not undermine the prosecution case, or that it is not possible which will completely undermine the prosecution case. 

There are no ifs, buts, ambiguity or opinion.

There is the problem of consistency - the test also needs to be consistent over time in order to be valid.

[Vertigo Swirl]

If exhibits hadn't been destroyed against all protocols then its quite possible modern forensic techniques could conclude the case.  For example fingerprints on casings and SC's nightdress subjected to DNA analysis.

Blood stain analysis and a shooting reconstruction are all to play for and might assist.

Other tests will almost certainly undermine the prosecution case to the extent it will resuly in JB's conviction being quashed.

How so?  If this is a fact, let’s have the cite(s).

[Caroline]

There's no evidence CC ever met with the pathologist Dr Vanezis.  I believe he did speak with SC's psychiatrist and discuss her medication but the appropriate person to determine toxicology was chemist Alexander Allan not SC's psychiatrist Dr Ferguson.

I don't believe anyone claimed at trial SC was over sedated etc.

Ferguson said that Sheila was over sedated on the initial dose which is why he gave his permission to reduce it.

[Caroline]

How so?  If this is a fact, let’s have the cite(s).

These are tests that Holly is intending on paying for - I'm pretty sure they won't prove Bamber is innocent, if anything at all.

[Brietta]

I agree there is no hard evidence of Sheila's guilt-------or, I would rather put it, that Sheila killed her family and then committed suicide. I believe her illness absolves her of guilt, but that's just my own feeling about it.

In addition, I will not go along with everything that either "guilters" or "supporters" say.  I will continue to explore all the information out there.

I think the only reason that the question arose that Sheila had massacred her family, while taking time out to knock blazes out of the father she loved before shooting herself twice was Jeremy Bamber's invention and his alibi.

The lies did not stand up to proper scrutiny.

[Vertigo Swirl]

These are tests that Holly is intending on paying for - I'm pretty sure they won't prove Bamber is innocent, if anything at all.

Tests on what?  I would imagine forensic testing done properly by qualified personnel does not come cheap, why would anyone invest in such a thing for someone they don’t know and have no connection to? 

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Hi Spy, it comes with the territory I'm afraid - I have posted Bambers letters before and have still been accused of not being honest. The best thing for everyone is to always post a source. If you have problems posting a document of page from CAL's book, just let me know and I'll do it for you. I have most of the documents and CAL's book but if it's something I don't have, I can walk you through how to post it. I also hate looking for the reference stuff but without it no one is going to believe it. As for Colin being wrong, G Unit has no idea if he's wrong or not - he may have been told that, perhaps they expected Sheila to have less meds in her system,

Thank you, Caroline, I really appreciate that!

I have had problems posting photos up on here, and I don’t know why — it just doesn’t always work for me. So I shall take you up on your kind offer :)

I admit I’m a tad lazy in as much looking for links to various things I’ve read, but there’s just so much I’ve read. It takes me ages hunting even through my screenshots, and I don’t take screenshots of every single thing.

From now on I will email links to myself that I consider important, and now I know how insistent some are on here for sources. It’s almost amusing that the very people doubting me are those who believe every solitary word that Jeremy Bamber says!

Meanwhile, between trying to do what I want to do, I’ll hunt down where I read about Sheila’s hair :)

[Holly Goodhead]

Sheila wasn't on trial.  Jeremy Bamber was and he was convicted of murdering her, her six year old sons and her parents.

The prosecution and defence agreed the perp was either JB or SC.  So of course SC was of interest to the court.

[Holly Goodhead]

I think the only reason that the question arose that Sheila had massacred her family, while taking time out to knock blazes out of the father she loved before shooting herself twice was Jeremy Bamber's invention and his alibi.

The lies did not stand up to proper scrutiny.

What evidence exists that anyone "knocked blazes out of NB".

[APRIL]

What evidence exists that anyone "knocked blazes out of NB".

That scalp wound is a little more than a scratch and I doubt he inflicted it on himself. How would you describe it?

[Holly Goodhead]

You are insistent on having a ‘shooting reconstruction’.  I am at a loss to understand how such a thing could possibly be accomplished.

I think it is nothing more than a red herring.

The witnesses are dead and only the shooter knows the sequence of the events he orchestrated and he has no intention of sharing.

It should have taken place for trial but its all to play for as the physical evidence still exists. No witnesses required.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780123822413/shooting-incident-reconstruction

[Holly Goodhead]

That scalp wound is a little more than a scratch and I doubt he inflicted it on himself. How would you describe it?

The pathologist provided a complete breakdown of the non-gunshot wounds.  He even states a woman of SC's build could have inflicted the injuries present.