Using capitals doesn't actually make your posts more compelling.
I have never said the dose was in anything other than the medium range but its within the low range of medium.
Medium ranges from 13.1 to 24.0. Therfore SC's level at 15.0 is clearly at the low end of medium.
There's no pathological evidence NB was beaten to "a pulp" and the pathologist was not surprised that a woman of SC's build was capable of inflicting the injuries NB presented with.
I don’t need to capitalise letters to express my view; words alone should be enough for one to understand my point. However, there are occasions when I feel it apt to highlight a specific word, but almost every time I try to use the facilities on this site to use italics or bold etc, it doesn’t seem to work. It’s possibly a fault my end, but that’s why I capitalise certain words... I hope you now understand why, Holly.
And talking of compelling posts, if you gave compelling answers to certain questions rather than avoiding them, your points would come across better, too. You fail to respond to awkward questions time and time again, which simply reinforces the fact you can’t think of an answer...
As for the Haloperidol you do indeed CONSTANTLY say the levels in Sheila’s blood were in the LOW region of MEDIUM.
Why not just say MEDIUM range like the specialists stated? They didn’t even mention where it fell within the medium range; it was irrelevant. But you’re trying to suggest Sheila had low levels, when she wasn’t even in the low region. People can see what you’re trying to do, and why. You want to make Sheila look like the Haloperidol was having no effect on her, but it was — as has been proven by both her doctor, family, friends and witnesses. They knew her: you didn’t. The doctor knew how much was in her system; he knew the side effects that amount would have caused — and I believe him, a doctor, rather than you, Holly, who has no medical knowledge at all, I believe?
You’re now, in your desperate attempt to try and make Sheila look like murderer, claiming Nevill wasn’t beaten to a pulp, when police and the pathologist proved otherwise. They said how he’d taken a TERRIBLE, vicious beating — even after his death — so stop trying to play down his injuries just because YOU want the evil convicted mass murderer to be granted yet another appeal.
And for you to outrageously say the pathologist said Sheila could have beaten Nevill to such a degree is not just ludicrous, it’s an utter lie. He never said that at all — you are trying to distort facts when the evidence is slapping you in the face. The pathologist was actually FURIOUS with the police the day after carrying out the post mortems, because they’d withheld vital evidence from him, whereby had he have been in possession of it he’d never have RELUCTANTLY said Sheila had committed suicide. He was already deeply suspicious as to how she could have shot herself even once, let alone twice, but Taff Jones was so insistent she had shot herself (TWICE) that Vanezis reluctantly agreed it was “possible”. That is, until the next day when he saw the photographic evidence and exhibits: and that’s when he spoke up and said Sheila could NOT have killed herself. And that’s why he reported Taff Jones.
I really think you need to refresh yourself with the facts, Holly. You get so many things wrong.
