New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[kizzy]

I don't think he is free to say what he likes and what he thinks. If he does he may well end up back in court. You might not have noticed he's been saying very little re the McCanns for the last 3 years

Well what more can he say apart from -  he believes the mccs are involved in what happened to maddie.

[Mr Gray]

Well what more can he say apart from -  he believes the mccs are involved in what happened to maddie.

He hasn't said that for a long time... Imo because he knows he could end up back in court

[jassi]

He hasn't said that for a long time... Imo because he knows he could end up back in court

Nah, it's a self-evident truth that he doesn't need to go on about.

IMO

[Anthro]

There is a possibility that the tripartite meeting is taking place at the moment (?)

[Carana]

There is a possibility that the tripartite meeting is taking place at the moment (?)

I'd read something to that effect as well, albeit uncorroborated. If the last one was in November (did that actually take place?), the next one may well be in May (i.e. a six-monthly update).

[barrier]

Not getting any where fast, 12 months on from concrete evidence.

"We are missing important information. We want no stone unturned. Whether there will be an indictment in the end, I cannot foresee at the moment.”

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/german-madeleine-mccann-police-still-24211523

[Vertigo Swirl]

Not getting any where fast, 12 months on from concrete evidence.

"We are missing important information. We want no stone unturned. Whether there will be an indictment in the end, I cannot foresee at the moment.”

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/german-madeleine-mccann-police-still-24211523

Sounds like they are going all out to investigate the disappearance as thoroughly and diligently as possible.  Good for them.

[barrier]

Sounds like they are going all out to investigate the disappearance as thoroughly and diligently as possible.  Good for them.

Oh yes indeed and when its over with no indictment of CB what then ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Oh yes indeed and when its over with no indictment of CB what then ?

Then no one can say that the suspect was not exhaustively investigated.  Of course there are numerous examples of cases where not enough evidence was ever gathered to mount a successful prosecution even though it's quite obvious the suspect was involved in the crime.  I suppose some people would view such a failure on the part of the German police as some sort of victory - what about you? 

[barrier]

Then no one can say that the suspect was not exhaustively investigated.  Of course there are numerous examples of cases where not enough evidence was ever gathered to mount a successful prosecution even though it's quite obvious the suspect was involved in the crime.  I suppose some people would view such a failure on the part of the German police as some sort of victory - what about you?

Far from it, I'd see it as unable to walk the walk after talking the talk.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Far from it, I'd see it as unable to walk the walk after talking the talk.

So you don't accept the premise that despite expending a huge amount of time and effort it is sometimes not possible to press charges owing to an insufficient amount of evidence, even though one may be very confident that one's suspicions are quite correct? 

[Carana]

So you don't accept the premise that despite expending a huge amount of time and effort it is sometimes not possible to press charges owing to an insufficient amount of evidence, even though one may be very confident that one's suspicions are quite correct?

Ouch.

[barrier]

So you don't accept the premise that despite expending a huge amount of time and effort it is sometimes not possible to press charges owing to an insufficient amount of evidence, even though one may be very confident that one's suspicions are quite correct?

You can only find what is there to be found,  the legend is writ that CB did for Madeleine, you've obviously bought into it.

[Brietta]

You can only find what is there to be found,  the legend is writ that CB did for Madeleine, you've obviously bought into it.

You are wrong I think.

The legend is writ that the only thing thing that would make Brueckner even more of the perfect patsy would be if he was dead.
The legend is also writ that Brueckner was driving around Luz in a cartoon covered camper van.

The legend is also writ that short back and sides Brueckner wore his hair in dreadlocks in May 2007.

I think you will probably find that Wolters deals in evidence leaving the legends to those who have a penchant for them.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You can only find what is there to be found,  the legend is writ that CB did for Madeleine, you've obviously bought into it.

You avoided my question, any reason why?  Do you or do you not accept that some suspects  cannot be successfully prosecuted because not enough concrete evidence can be found, even though it’s quit obvious they are involved?  Think a couple of Stephen Lawrence’s attackers for example.  Would you describe the investigation into them as merely legend writing by the police that gullible fools like me bought into?