Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[Mr Gray]

But not certain so not solved?

A little like Richard Dawkins saying he's an agnostic not an atheist

[faithlilly]

A little like Richard Dawkins saying he's an agnostic not an atheist

Could you please answer the question?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I think he said something about revealing in the New Yr./Spring.

I’d better keep standing then, don’t want to do myself an injury.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Why would CB's defence lawyer be in communication with a long retired member of PJ?

Amaral seems to be getting info from a leaky PJ.

[Robittybob1]

It absolutely would and I don't see how he would say such a thing if he didn't know it to be true

The truth of the matter needs to be determined by a court.  Otherwise, CB has presumed to be guilty rather than innocent and that was one of his rights under the ECHR rules.

[barrier]

The germans may well have proof that Maddie  was abducted... And they may well have already visited Luz. SY have already and support abduction.
Amarals contribution according to MARK S is that the shutters could not beopened from the outside... Which of course is rubbish

Wolters makes no mention of his suspect removing Madeleine from 5a, it's the big sticking point imo how did the two come together for his suspect to have killed the girl.

[Mr Gray]

The truth of the matter needs to be determined by a court.  Otherwise, CB has presumed to be guilty rather than innocent and that was one of his rights under the ECHR rules.

Again... That's another reason why Wolters would not make such a statement unless he was sure

[Mr Gray]

Wolters makes no mention of his suspect removing Madeleine from 5a, it's the big sticking point imo how did the two come together for his suspect to have killed the girl.

I don't see it as any sort of sticking point

[Robittybob1]

Again... That's another reason why Wolters would not make such a statement unless he was sure

Is he falling into the same trap GA did?  IMO no matter how sure he is he should not publically claim CB is guilty until there is a trial finding CB guilty. 

[Mr Gray]

Is he falling into the same trap GA did?  IMO no matter how sure he is he should not publically claim CB is guilty until there is a trial finding CB guilty.

He can do what he likes ..who is going to stop him
..

[Robittybob1]

He can do what he likes ..who is going to stop him
..

Is that right?  CB could take case of libel against HCW in a German civil court.

[Mr Gray]

Is that right?  CB could take case of libel against HCW in a German civil court.

I'm not sure he can because of privelige... And if Wolters does have the evidence he's protected by truth

[Robittybob1]

I'm not sure he can because of privilege... And if Wolters does have the evidence he's protected by truth

I'd have to understand what privilege would do, but I thought it should be evident whether he has said CB is guilty before any trial has happened.

The dictionary definition of Privilege doesn't help me much.  "noun
a special right, advantage, or immunity granted or available only to a particular person or group.
"education is a right, not a privilege"

Either it is published or not.  Maybe it is only in the foreign press that this claim appears but his presumption of innocence is maintained in the German press.

[G-Unit]

I'm not sure he can because of privelige... And if Wolters does have the evidence he's protected by truth

Wolters has publicly declared someone a murderer before any trial has taken place which is in breach of that person's human rights.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Wolters has publicly declared someone a murderer before any trial has taken place which is in breach of that person's human rights.

Has he stated it as fact or opinion?